Sustainability of wastewater treatment with microalgae in cold climate, evaluated with emergy and socio-ecological principles

被引:61
作者
Grönlund, E
Klang, A
Falk, S
Hanaeus, J
机构
[1] Mid Sweden Univ, Div Ecotech, Ostersund, Sweden
[2] Lulea Univ Technol, Div Sanitary Engn, S-95187 Lulea, Sweden
[3] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Inst Ecol, N-7034 Trondheim, Norway
关键词
sustainability; microalgae; wastewater treatment; emergy; socio-ecological principles; cold climate;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoleng.2004.03.002
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The sustainability of a microalgae wastewater treatment plant model (ALGA), assumed serving a small Swedish town with 10,000 inhabitants at latitude 60degreesN, was tested by comparing it to a conventional three-step treatment plant (WWTP), and a mechanical and chemical treatment plant (TP) complemented with a constructed wetland (TP + CW). Using two assessment methods-the socio-ecological principles method and emergy analysis-the ALGA model considered to have a better position for sustainable development, than the other two. In emergy terms the ALGA model had about half the resource use of the other two alternatives, and used most local free environmental resources, four times the TP + CW, and 100 times the WWTP. The violations against the second and third socio-ecological principles were considered equal for the three alternatives, the fourth was estimated to be in favor of the ALGA model, and the first principle was calculated to be in favor of the ALGA model with about eight times lower indicator value sum. Recirculation of nutrients back to society or production of economically viable products from the treatment by-products would strongly influence the sustainability. The ALGA model has a potential advantage due to interesting biochemical contents in the microalgae biomass, depending on what species will become dominating. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:155 / 174
页数:20
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]   Socio-ecological indicators for sustainability [J].
Azar, C ;
Holmberg, J ;
Lindgren, K .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 1996, 18 (02) :89-112
[2]  
BENGTSSON M, 1997, CASE STUDIES CONVENT
[3]   Emergy analysis of municipal wastewater treatment and generation of electricity by digestion of sewage sludge [J].
Björklund, J ;
Geber, U ;
Rydberg, T .
RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2001, 31 (04) :293-316
[4]  
Bjorklund J, 2000, EMERGY ANAL ASSESS E
[5]   Greenhouse gas balances in building construction:: wood versus concrete from life-cycle and forest land-use perspectives [J].
Börjesson, P ;
Gustavsson, L .
ENERGY POLICY, 2000, 28 (09) :575-588
[6]  
BOSSEL H., 1999, INDICATORS SUSTAINAB
[7]  
Brown MT, 1999, AMBIO, V28, P486
[8]   Emergy-based indices and ratios to evaluate sustainability: monitoring economies and technology toward environmentally sound innovation [J].
Brown, MT ;
Ulgiati, S .
ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 1997, 9 (1-2) :51-69
[9]  
BROWN MT, 1995, EMERGY EVALUATION EN
[10]  
*BRUNDTL COMM, 1987, COMM FUT