Factors associated with bone metastasis in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:7
|
作者
Liu, Huanmei [1 ]
Zhang, Xinxin [1 ]
Zhang, Shuguang [1 ]
Wang, Xue [1 ]
Yu, Shengji [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Natl Canc Ctr, Canc Hosp, Natl Clin Res Ctr Canc, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
Breast cancer (BC); bone metastasis (BM); relevant factors; meta-analysis; SKELETAL-RELATED EVENTS; RISK-FACTORS; PROGNOSTIC-FACTORS; STAGE-II; RECURRENCE; RECEPTOR; CONSENSUS; SURVIVAL; SUBTYPES; THERAPY;
D O I
10.21037/apm-21-438
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: To systematically evaluate and analyze the risk factors for breast cancer (BC) with bone metastasis (BM) and provide clinical evidence supporting the early prevention of BM. Methods: We systematically retrieved databases from the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE for BC with BM patient. Limited: publish cation between January 1, 2001, and December 31, 2019. Literature screening and evaluation were performed independently by 2 evaluators. The quality of all included studies was evaluated with the NOS. Studies with NOS >= 6 on factors related to the BM of BC were identified. Weighted odds ratio (OR) were used as the combined effects. Results: We identified 18 articles with available data. The NOS scores ranged from 6-9. Progesterone receptor (PR)-positive BC patients had a relatively lower risk of BM [I-2=45.9%, OR =0.80, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.72, 0.88, P<0.001]. HER2-positive BC patients had a relatively higher risk of BM (I-2=77.6%, OR =1.35, 95% CI: 1.04, 1.76, P=0.025). The risk of BM in patients with lymph node metastasis was higher than that in patients with no lymph node metastasis (I-2=99.7%, OR =2.60, 95% CI: 1.41, 4.80, P=0.002). The risk of BM in stage T2 BC patients was 1.99 times that in stage T1 BC patients (I-2=96.8%, OR =1.99, 95% CI: 1.03, 3.83, P=0.040). The risk of BM in stage T3 BC patients was 4.74 times that in stage T1 BC patients (I-2=95.6%, OR =4.74, 95% CI: 1.94, 11.57, P=0.001). The risk of BM in stage T4 BC patients was 14.57 times that in stage T1 BC patients (I-2=95.4%, OR =14.57, 95% CI: 4.16, 51.05, P<0.001). The incidence of BM in BC patients without lobular or ductal BC was significantly higher than that in patients with ductal BC (I-2=56.4%, OR =1.26, 95% CI: 1.09, 1.45, P=0.001). Discussion: Patients with PR-positive BC have a relatively lower risk of BM. Patients with HER2-positive, lymph node metastasis-positive, nonlobular, or ductal BC have a relatively higher risk of BM. With increasing T stage, the risk of BM in BC patients also increases.
引用
收藏
页码:4435 / 4452
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] IVF and breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sergentanis, Theodoros N.
    Diamantaras, Andreas-Antonios
    Perlepe, Christina
    Kanavidis, Prodromos
    Skalkidou, Alkistis
    Petridou, Eleni Th.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE, 2014, 20 (01) : 106 - 123
  • [32] Psychoeducation for breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Setyowibowo, Hari
    Yudiana, Whisnu
    Hunfeld, Joke A. M.
    Iskandarsyah, Aulia
    Passchier, Jan
    Arzomand, Homra
    Sadarjoen, Sawitri S.
    de Vries, Ralph
    Sijbrandij, Marit
    BREAST, 2022, 62 : 36 - 51
  • [33] Pilates for breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Espindula, Roberta Costa
    Nadas, Gabriella Barbosa
    da Rosa, Maria Ines
    Foster, Charlie
    de Araujo, Florentino Cardoso
    Grande, Antonio Jose
    REVISTA DA ASSOCIACAO MEDICA BRASILEIRA, 2017, 63 (11): : 1006 - 1011
  • [34] Chemotoxicity and Associated Risk Factors in Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Han, Claire J.
    Ning, Xia
    Burd, Christin E.
    Spakowicz, Daniel J.
    Tounkara, Fode
    Kalady, Matthew F.
    Noonan, Anne M.
    McCabe, Susan
    Von Ah, Diane
    CANCERS, 2024, 16 (14)
  • [35] Factors associated with cancer treatment delay: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Morrill, Kristin E.
    Robles-Morales, Rogelio
    Lopez-Pentecost, Melissa
    Martinez Portilla, Raigam J.
    Saleh, Ahlam A.
    Skiba, Meghan B.
    Riall, Taylor S.
    Austin, Jessica D.
    Hirschey, Rachel
    Jacobs, Elizabeth T.
    Spotleson, Lena
    Hanna, Timothy P.
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (06):
  • [36] Recurrence and associated factors of breast cancer among women in sub saharan africa, systematic review and meta-analysis
    Gedfew, Mihretie
    Getie, Addisu
    Akalu, Tadesse Yirga
    Ayenew, Temesgen
    EJSO, 2024, 50 (09):
  • [37] Prognostic factors in patients with spinal metastasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Luksanapruksa, Panya
    Buchowski, Jacob M.
    Hotchkiss, William
    Tongsai, Sasima
    Wilartratsami, Sirichai
    Chotivichit, Areesak
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2017, 17 (05): : 689 - 708
  • [38] Intrauterine factors and risk of breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of current evidence
    Xue, Fei
    Michels, Karin B.
    LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2007, 8 (12): : 1088 - 1100
  • [39] Factors affecting uptake and adherence to breast cancer chemoprevention: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Smith, S. G.
    Sestak, I.
    Forster, A.
    Partridge, A.
    Side, L.
    Horne, R.
    Wardle, J.
    Cuzick, J.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2016, 76
  • [40] Risk Factors of Breast Cancer in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Namiranian, Nasim
    Moradi-Lakeh, Maziar
    Razavi-Ratki, Seid Kazem
    Doayie, Mahdyie
    Nojomi, Marzieh
    ASIAN PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2014, 15 (21) : 9535 - 9541