Applications of meta-analytic structural equation modelling in health psychology: examples, issues, and recommendations

被引:63
|
作者
Cheung, Mike W. -L. [1 ]
Hong, Ryan Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Psychol, Singapore, Singapore
关键词
Structural equation modelling; meta-analysis; meta-analytic structural equation modelling; theory of planned behaviour; health psychology; ALL-CAUSE MORTALITY; PLANNED BEHAVIOR; CONFIDENCE-INTERVALS; CORRELATION-MATRICES; PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY; SOCIAL INFLUENCES; TEST STATISTICS; REASONED ACTION; INTERVENTIONS; PERSONALITY;
D O I
10.1080/17437199.2017.1343678
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Statistical methods play an important role in behavioural, medical, and social sciences. Two recent statistical advances are structural equation modelling (SEM) and meta-analysis. SEM is used to test hypothesised models based on substantive theories, which can be path, confirmatory factor analytic, or full structural equation models. Meta-analysis is used to synthesise research findings in a particular topic. This article demonstrates another recent statistical advance - meta-analytic structural equation modelling (MASEM) - that combines meta-analysis and SEM to synthesise research findings for the purpose of testing hypothesised models. Using the theory of planned behaviour as an example, we show how MASEM can be used to address important research questions that cannot be answered by univariate meta-analyses on Pearson correlations. Specifically, MASEM allows researchers to: (1) test whether the proposed models are consistent with the data; (2) estimate partial effects after controlling for other variables; (3) estimate functions of parameter estimates such as indirect effects; and (4) include latent variables in the models. We illustrate the procedures with an example on the theory of planned behaviour. Practical issues in MASEM and suggested solutions are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:265 / 279
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Flexible work arrangements and employee health: A meta-analytic review
    Shifrin, Nicole V.
    Michel, Jesse S.
    WORK AND STRESS, 2022, 36 (01): : 60 - 85
  • [42] Issues in Solving the Problem of Effect Size Heterogeneity in Meta-Analytic Structural Equation Modeling: A Commentary and Simulation Study on Yu, Downes, Carter, and O'Boyle (2016)
    Cheung, Mike W. -L.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 103 (07) : 787 - 803
  • [43] Structural equation modelling in marketing and business research Critical issues and practical recommendations
    Martinez-Lopez, Francisco J.
    Gazquez-Abad, Juan C.
    Sousa, Carlos M. P.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 2013, 47 (1-2) : 115 - 152
  • [44] Patient compliance with telephone triage recommendations: A meta-analytic review
    Purc-Stephenson, Rebecca J.
    Thrasher, Christine
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2012, 87 (02) : 135 - 142
  • [45] Analyzing matrices of meta-analytic correlations: current practices and recommendations
    Sheng, Zitong
    Kong, Wenmo
    Cortina, Jose M.
    Hou, Shuofei
    RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, 2016, 7 (02) : 187 - 208
  • [46] Marital Quality and Health: A Meta-Analytic Review
    Robles, Theodore F.
    Slatcher, Richard B.
    Trombello, Joseph M.
    McGinn, Meghan M.
    PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2014, 140 (01) : 140 - 187
  • [47] Perceived Discrimination and Health: A Meta-Analytic Review
    Pascoe, Elizabeth A.
    Richman, Laura Smart
    PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2009, 135 (04) : 531 - 554
  • [48] The reasoned action approach applied to health behavior: Role of past behavior and tests of some key moderators using meta-analytic structural equation modeling
    Hagger, Martin S.
    Polet, Juho
    Lintunen, Taru
    SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2018, 213 : 85 - 94
  • [49] Calculative trust, relational trust, and organizational performance: A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach
    Bai, Jingkun
    Su, Jiaoyue
    Xin, Zihao
    Wang, Chengqi
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2024, 172
  • [50] Meta-analytic review of structural brain abnormalities in PTSD
    Karl, Anke
    Schaefer, Michael
    Malta, Loretta S.
    Dorfel, Denise
    Rohleder, Nicolas
    Werner, Annett
    PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2006, 43 : S50 - S51