Function Allocation Considerations in the Era of Human Autonomy Teaming

被引:33
作者
Roth, Emilie M. [1 ]
Sushereba, Christen [2 ]
Militello, Laura G. [2 ]
Diiulio, Julie [2 ]
Ernst, Katie [2 ]
机构
[1] Roth Cognit Engn, 765 Frenchmans Rd, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Appl Decis Sci, Cincinnati, OH USA
关键词
cognitive task analysis; cognitive work analysis; function allocation; human machine teaming; human autonomy teaming; human-automation interaction; human system integration; methods; topics; COGNITIVE WORK ANALYSIS; HUMAN-AUTOMATION INTERACTION; MODELING PRESUMPTIVE ASPECTS; COMPLEX-SYSTEMS; DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS; SITUATION AWARENESS; REQUIREMENTS; CHALLENGES; FRAMEWORKS; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1177/1555343419878038
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Function allocation refers to strategies for distributing system functions and tasks across people and technology. We review approaches to function allocation in the context of human machine teaming with technology that exhibits high levels of autonomy (e.g., unmanned aerial systems). Although most function allocation projects documented in the literature have employed a single method, we advocate for an integrated approach that leverages four key activities: (1) analyzing operational demands and work requirements; (2) exploring alternative distribution of work across person and machine agents that make up a human machine team (HMT); (3) examining interdependencies between human and autonomous technologies required for effective HMT performance under routine and off-nominal (unexpected) conditions; and (4) exploring the trade-space of alternative HMT options. Our literature review identified methods to support each of these activities. In combination, they enable system designers to uncover, explore, and weigh a range of critical design considerations beyond those emphasized by the MABA-MABA ("Men are better at, Machines are better at") and Levels of Automation function allocation traditions. Example applications are used to illustrate the value of these methods to design of HMT that includes autonomous machine agents.
引用
收藏
页码:199 / 220
页数:22
相关论文
共 79 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2011, MILSTD46855A
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1996, Cognition in the wild
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1999, MILHDBK46855A
  • [4] Socio-technical systems: From design methods to systems engineering
    Baxter, Gordon
    Sommerville, Ian
    [J]. INTERACTING WITH COMPUTERS, 2011, 23 (01) : 4 - 17
  • [5] The incident command system: High-reliability organizing for complex and volatile task environments
    Bigley, GA
    Roberts, KH
    [J]. ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2001, 44 (06) : 1281 - 1299
  • [6] Bisantz A., 2007, Reviews of human factors and ergonomics, V3, P1, DOI [10.1518/155723408X299825, DOI 10.1518/155723408X299825]
  • [7] Bisantz A.M., 2008, APPL COGNITIVE WORK
  • [8] Integrating cognitive analyses in a large-scale system design process
    Bisantz, AM
    Roth, E
    Brickman, B
    Gosbee, LL
    Hettinger, L
    McKinney, J
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER STUDIES, 2003, 58 (02) : 177 - 206
  • [9] Psychophysiology and adaptive automation
    Byrne, EA
    Parasuraman, R
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 42 (03) : 249 - 268
  • [10] Human-autonomy teaming interface design considerations for multi-unmanned vehicle control
    Calhoun, G. L.
    Ruff, H. A.
    Behymer, K. J.
    Frost, E. M.
    [J]. THEORETICAL ISSUES IN ERGONOMICS SCIENCE, 2018, 19 (03) : 321 - 352