The pedagogical value of near-peer feedback in online OSCEs

被引:8
作者
Sader, Julia [1 ]
Cerutti, Bernard [1 ]
Meynard, Louise [2 ]
Geoffroy, Frederic [1 ]
Meister, Veronique [2 ]
Paignon, Adeline [2 ,3 ]
Junod Perron, Noelle [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Geneva, Fac Med, Unit Dev & Res Med Educ, Rue Michel Servet 1,CMU 5-6, Geneva, Switzerland
[2] Interprofess Ctr Simulat CIS, Geneva, Switzerland
[3] HES SO Univ Appl Sci & Arts Western Switzerland, Sch Hlth Sci Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
关键词
Near-peer; Feedback; Online; OSCE; MEDICAL-EDUCATION; FACULTY; TEACHERS; COMMUNICATION; PERCEPTIONS; ASSESSMENTS; RESIDENTS; COMPARE; SCIENCE; SKILLS;
D O I
10.1186/s12909-022-03629-8
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Purpose of the article During the Covid-19 pandemic, formative OSCE were transformed into online OSCE, and senior students (near peers) substituted experienced clinical teachers. The aims of the study were to evaluate quality of the feedbacks given by near peers during online OSCEs and explore the experience of near-peer feedback from both learner's and near peer's perspectives. Materials and methods All 2nd year medical students (n = 158) attended an online OSCE under the supervision of twelve senior medical students. Outcome measures were 1) students' perception of the quality of the feedback through an online survey (Likert 1-5); 2) objective assessment of the quality of the feedback focusing on both the process and the content using a feedback scale (Likert 1-5); 3) experience of near peer feedback in two different focus groups. Results One hundred six medical students answered the questionnaire and had their feedback session videotaped. The mean perceived overall quality of senior students' overall feedback was 4.75 SD 0.52. They especially valued self-evaluation (mean 4.80 SD 0.67), balanced feedback (mean 4.93 SD 0.29) and provision of simulated patient's feedback (mean 4.97 SD 0.17). The overall objective assessment of the feedback quality was 3.73 SD 0.38: highly scored skills were subjectivity (mean 3.95 SD 1.12) and taking into account student's self-evaluation (mean 3.71 (SD 0.87). Senior students mainly addressed history taking issues (mean items 3.53 SD 2.37) and communication skills (mean items 4.89 SD 2.43) during feedback. Participants reported that near peer feedback was less stressful and more tailored to learning needs- challenges for senior students included to remain objective and to provide negative feedback. Conclusion Increased involvement of near peers in teaching activities is strongly supported for formative OSCE and should be implemented in parallel even if experience teachers are again involved in such teaching activities. However, it requires training not only on feedback skills but also on the specific content of the formative OSCE.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 48 条
[31]   Comparison of student examiner to faculty examiner scoring and feedback in an OSCE [J].
Moineau, Genevieve ;
Power, Barbara ;
Pion, Anne-Marie J. ;
Wood, Timothy J. ;
Humphrey-Murto, Susan .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2011, 45 (02) :183-191
[32]   Maturational differences in undergraduate medical students' perceptions about feedback [J].
Murdoch-Eaton, Deborah ;
Sargeant, Joan .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2012, 46 (07) :711-721
[33]   Workplace-based assessment as an educational tool: AMEE Guide No. 31 [J].
Norcini, John ;
Burch, Vanessa .
MEDICAL TEACHER, 2007, 29 (9-10) :855-871
[34]   The quality of feedback during formative OSCEs depends on the tutors' profile [J].
Perron, Noelle Junod ;
Louis-Simonet, Martine ;
Cerutti, Bernard ;
Pfarrwaller, Eva ;
Sommer, Johanna ;
Nendaz, Mathieu .
BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2016, 16 :1-8
[35]   Effectiveness of a training program in supervisors' ability to provide feedback on residents' communication skills [J].
Perron, Noelle Junod ;
Nendaz, Mathieu ;
Louis-Simonet, Martine ;
Sommer, Johanna ;
Gut, Anne ;
Baroffio, Anne ;
Dolmans, Diana ;
van der Vleuten, Cees .
ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2013, 18 (05) :901-915
[36]   How does peer teaching compare to faculty teaching? A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Rees, Eliot L. ;
Quinn, Patrick J. ;
Davies, Benjamin ;
Fotheringham, Victoria .
MEDICAL TEACHER, 2016, 38 (08) :829-837
[37]   Do clinical clerks provide candidates with adequate formative assessment during objective structured clinical examinations? [J].
Reiter, HI ;
Rosenfeld, J ;
Nandagopal, K ;
Eva, K .
ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2004, 9 (03) :189-199
[38]   Peer teaching medical students during a pandemic [J].
Roberts, Victoria ;
Malone, Katie ;
Moore, Paul ;
Russell-Webster, Tamarind ;
Caulfield, Rachel .
MEDICAL EDUCATION ONLINE, 2020, 25 (01)
[39]   A Near-Peer Educational Model for Online, Interactive Learning in Emergency Medicine [J].
Rosenthal, Hailey B. ;
Sikka, Neha ;
Lieber, Adam C. ;
Sanky, Charles ;
Cayon, Christian ;
Newman, Daniel ;
Marquez, Denisse R. ;
Ziff, Jacob ;
Blum, James R. ;
Dai, Jennifer B. ;
Groden, Phillip ;
Pasik, Sara ;
Pour, Trevor .
WESTERN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2021, 22 (01) :130-135
[40]  
Schuwirth L, 2017, PERSPECT MED EDUC, V6, P211, DOI 10.1007/s40037-017-0345-1