The pedagogical value of near-peer feedback in online OSCEs

被引:8
作者
Sader, Julia [1 ]
Cerutti, Bernard [1 ]
Meynard, Louise [2 ]
Geoffroy, Frederic [1 ]
Meister, Veronique [2 ]
Paignon, Adeline [2 ,3 ]
Junod Perron, Noelle [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Geneva, Fac Med, Unit Dev & Res Med Educ, Rue Michel Servet 1,CMU 5-6, Geneva, Switzerland
[2] Interprofess Ctr Simulat CIS, Geneva, Switzerland
[3] HES SO Univ Appl Sci & Arts Western Switzerland, Sch Hlth Sci Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
关键词
Near-peer; Feedback; Online; OSCE; MEDICAL-EDUCATION; FACULTY; TEACHERS; COMMUNICATION; PERCEPTIONS; ASSESSMENTS; RESIDENTS; COMPARE; SCIENCE; SKILLS;
D O I
10.1186/s12909-022-03629-8
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Purpose of the article During the Covid-19 pandemic, formative OSCE were transformed into online OSCE, and senior students (near peers) substituted experienced clinical teachers. The aims of the study were to evaluate quality of the feedbacks given by near peers during online OSCEs and explore the experience of near-peer feedback from both learner's and near peer's perspectives. Materials and methods All 2nd year medical students (n = 158) attended an online OSCE under the supervision of twelve senior medical students. Outcome measures were 1) students' perception of the quality of the feedback through an online survey (Likert 1-5); 2) objective assessment of the quality of the feedback focusing on both the process and the content using a feedback scale (Likert 1-5); 3) experience of near peer feedback in two different focus groups. Results One hundred six medical students answered the questionnaire and had their feedback session videotaped. The mean perceived overall quality of senior students' overall feedback was 4.75 SD 0.52. They especially valued self-evaluation (mean 4.80 SD 0.67), balanced feedback (mean 4.93 SD 0.29) and provision of simulated patient's feedback (mean 4.97 SD 0.17). The overall objective assessment of the feedback quality was 3.73 SD 0.38: highly scored skills were subjectivity (mean 3.95 SD 1.12) and taking into account student's self-evaluation (mean 3.71 (SD 0.87). Senior students mainly addressed history taking issues (mean items 3.53 SD 2.37) and communication skills (mean items 4.89 SD 2.43) during feedback. Participants reported that near peer feedback was less stressful and more tailored to learning needs- challenges for senior students included to remain objective and to provide negative feedback. Conclusion Increased involvement of near peers in teaching activities is strongly supported for formative OSCE and should be implemented in parallel even if experience teachers are again involved in such teaching activities. However, it requires training not only on feedback skills but also on the specific content of the formative OSCE.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 48 条
[21]   Peer assessment in the objective structured clinical examination: A scoping review [J].
Khan, Rishad ;
Payne, Michael W. C. ;
Chahine, Saad .
MEDICAL TEACHER, 2017, 39 (07) :745-756
[22]   Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE Guide No. 131 [J].
Kiger, Michelle E. ;
Varpio, Lara .
MEDICAL TEACHER, 2020, 42 (08) :846-854
[23]   Knowledge transfer of spinal manipulation skills by student-teachers: a randomised controlled trial [J].
Knobe, Matthias ;
Holschen, Malte ;
Mooij, Saskia Catharina ;
Sellei, Richard Martin ;
Muenker, Ralf ;
Antony, Pia ;
Pfeifer, Roman ;
Drescher, Wolf ;
Pape, Hans-Christoph .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2012, 21 (05) :992-998
[24]   Reconceptualizing Variable Rater Assessments as Both an Educational and Clinical Care Problem [J].
Kogan, Jennifer R. ;
Conforti, Lisa N. ;
Iobst, William F. ;
Holmboe, Eric S. .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2014, 89 (05) :721-727
[25]   Faculty staff perceptions of feedback to residents after direct observation of clinical skills [J].
Kogan, Jennifer R. ;
Conforti, Lisa N. ;
Bernabeo, Elizabeth C. ;
Durning, Steven J. ;
Hauer, Karen E. ;
Holmboe, Eric S. .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2012, 46 (02) :201-215
[26]   Hospitalists as teachers - How do they compare to subspecialty and general medicine faculty? [J].
Kripalani, S ;
Pope, AC ;
Rask, K ;
Hunt, K ;
Dressler, DD ;
Branch, WT ;
Zhang, R ;
Williams, MV .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2004, 19 (01) :8-15
[27]  
Krueger R.A., 2000, Focus groups, V3rd
[28]   Patient-centred communication: a sophisticated procedure [J].
Levinson, Wendy .
BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2011, 20 (10) :823-825
[29]   Understanding the experience of being taught by peers: the value of social and cognitive congruence [J].
Lockspeiser, Tai M. ;
O'Sullivan, Patricia ;
Teherani, Arianne ;
Muller, Jessica .
ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2008, 13 (03) :361-372
[30]   Impact of workplace based assessment on doctors' education and performance: a systematic review [J].
Miller, Alice ;
Archer, Julian .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2010, 341 :710