A real-world US study of recurrence risks using combined clinicopathological features in HR-positive, HER2-negative early breast cancer

被引:36
作者
Sheffield, Kristin M. [1 ]
Peachey, Jessica R. [1 ]
Method, Michael [1 ,5 ]
Grimes, Brenda R. [1 ]
Brown, Jacqueline [1 ]
Saverno, Kim [1 ,6 ]
Sugihara, Tomoko [2 ]
Cui, Zhanglin Lin [1 ]
Lee, Kimberley T. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Eli Lilly & Co, Indianapolis, IN 46225 USA
[2] Syneos Hlth, Morrisville, NC 27560 USA
[3] H Lee Moffitt Canc Ctr & Res Inst, Dept Breast Oncol, Tampa, FL 33612 USA
[4] H Lee Moffitt Canc Ctr & Res Inst, Dept Hlth Outcomes & Behav, Tampa, FL 33612 USA
[5] ImmunoGen, Waltham, MA 02451 USA
[6] Incyte Corp, US Med Affairs, Wilmington, DE 19803 USA
关键词
early breast cancer; HER2(-); HR+; recurrence; risk factors; ADJUVANT ENDOCRINE THERAPY; LOCOREGIONAL RECURRENCE; CHEMOTHERAPY PLUS; RECEPTOR; PALBOCICLIB; PROGNOSIS; ESTROGEN; WOMEN; SCORE; HER2;
D O I
10.2217/fon-2022-0310
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Plain language summary Breast cancer is frequently diagnosed early, at a stage when patients can be cured. However, some patients have breast cancers (tumors) with a high risk of recurrence. When cancers come back, a cure is often not possible. This study looks at multiple high-risk tumor features and the risk of cancer returning, in the most common breast cancer type, known as hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer. In patients with high-risk tumors, breast cancer returned in about 11.9% of patients within 2 years and in 29.8% of patients at 5 years. The risk of recurrence or death was three-times higher in patients with high-risk tumors compared to patients with nonhigh-risk tumors. These results suggest better treatments are needed to prevent breast cancers from coming back in patients at high risk of recurrence. Aim: To assess invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) and distant relapse-free survival (DRFS) in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative early breast cancer with combined clinicopathological criteria from monarchE, a phase III study of abemaciclib. Methods: US electronic health records were used to compare outcomes between high-risk (>= 4 lymph nodes, or 1-3 lymph nodes and grade 3, tumor >= 5 cm, or Ki-67 >= 20%) versus nonhigh-risk groups using Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox regression models. Results: The high-risk group (n = 557) was at higher risk for IDFS and DRFS events than the nonhigh-risk group (n = 3471). IDFS events (hazard ratio: 3.07; 95% CI: 2.45-3.83) and DRFS events (hazard ratio: 3.15; 95% CI: 2.49-3.97) were significantly higher for the high-risk group. Conclusion: Risk of recurrence was three-times greater in the high-risk group, highlighting the need for better therapies.
引用
收藏
页码:2667 / 2682
页数:16
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]  
Abe O, 2005, LANCET, V366, P2087, DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)66544-0
[2]  
Agilent, 2021, AG REC FDA COMP DIAG
[3]   Time-varying effect and long-term survival analysis in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy [J].
Baulies, S. ;
Belin, L. ;
Mallon, P. ;
Senechal, C. ;
Pierga, J-Y ;
Cottu, P. ;
Sablin, M-P ;
Sastre, X. ;
Asselain, B. ;
Rouzier, R. ;
Reyal, F. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2015, 113 (01) :30-36
[4]   Variables with time-varying effects and the Cox model: Some statistical concepts illustrated with a prognostic factor study in breast cancer [J].
Bellera, Carine A. ;
MacGrogan, Gaetan ;
Debled, Marc ;
de lara, Christine Tunon ;
Brouste, Veronique ;
Mathoulin-Pelissier, Simone .
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2010, 10
[5]   Prognostic effect of estrogen receptor status across age in primary breast cancer [J].
Bentzon, Niels ;
Duering, Maria ;
Rasmussen, Birgitte Bruun ;
Mouridsen, Henning ;
Kroman, Niels .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2008, 122 (05) :1089-1094
[6]   Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy for Women With Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer: ASCO Clinical Practice Guideline Focused Update [J].
Burstein, Harold J. ;
Lacchetti, Christina ;
Anderson, Holly ;
Buchholz, Thomas A. ;
Davidson, Nancy E. ;
Gelmon, Karen A. ;
Giordano, Sharon H. ;
Hudis, Clifford A. ;
Solky, Alexander J. ;
Stearns, Vered ;
Winer, Eric P. ;
Griggs, Jennifer J. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 37 (05) :423-+
[7]  
Cefaro GA, 2014, ANTICANCER RES, V34, P1207
[8]  
Chen X L, 2016, Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi, V38, P448, DOI 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3766.2016.06.009
[9]   Hazard of Recurrence among Women after Primary Breast Cancer Treatment-A 10-Year Follow-up Using Data from SEER-Medicare [J].
Cheng, Lee ;
Swartz, Michael D. ;
Zhao, Hui ;
Kapadia, Asha S. ;
Lai, Dejian ;
Rowan, Paul J. ;
Buchholz, Thomas A. ;
Giordano, Sharon H. .
CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2012, 21 (05) :800-809
[10]   PIK3CA alterations and benefit with neratinib: analysis from the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III ExteNET trial [J].
Chia, Stephen K. L. ;
Martin, Miguel ;
Holmes, Frankie A. ;
Ejlertsen, Bent ;
Delaloge, Suzette ;
Moy, Beverly ;
Iwata, Hiroji ;
von Minckwitz, Gunter ;
Mansi, Janine ;
Barrios, Carlos H. ;
Gnant, Michael ;
Tomasevic, Zorica ;
Denduluri, Neelima ;
Separovic, Robert ;
Kim, Sung-Bae ;
Jakobsen, Erik Hugger ;
Harvey, Vernon ;
Robert, Nicholas ;
Smith, John, II ;
Harker, Graydon ;
Zhang, Bo ;
Eli, Lisa D. ;
Ye, Yining ;
Lalani, Alshad S. ;
Buyse, Marc ;
Chan, Arlene .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2019, 21