Decision framework with integrated methods for group decision-making under probabilistic hesitant fuzzy context and unknown weights

被引:29
作者
Garg, Harish [1 ]
Krishankumar, R. [2 ]
Ravichandran, K. S. [3 ]
机构
[1] Thapar Inst Engn & Technol Deemed Univ, Sch Math, Patiala 147004, Punjab, India
[2] Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Amrita Sch Engn, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
[3] Rajiv Gandhi Natl Inst Youth Dev, Sriperumbudur, TN, India
关键词
Attitude-based entropy; Group decision-making; Muirhead mean; Regret theory; WASPAS approach; WASPAS METHOD; BEHAVIOR; REGRET; SETS; PROJECT;
D O I
10.1016/j.eswa.2022.117082
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
A hesitant fuzzy set is a flexible generalization of a fuzzy set that permits agents to furnish multiple views and the occurrence probability of each element is either the same or unknown. However, in our day-to-day problems, such an assumption is always narrow. The researchers state a concept of probabilistic hesitant fuzzy set (PHFS) to handle this. Based on the previous studies on PHFS, specific gaps can be identified, such as (i) agents' weights are not methodically determined, (ii) approaches for criteria weights do not consider criteria interrelationship and the importance of agents, (iii) preferences are aggregated without considering the agents' discrimination factors, risk appetite, and interdependencies, (iv) Broad/moderate rank values with reduced rank reversal phenomenon during prioritization is not taken. To overcome these drawbacks, in this article, we presented a new decision- making approach in which an attitude-based Shannon entropy and regret/rejoice approach is utilized to calculate the criteria and agents' weights, respectively. Further, a variance-based Muirhead mean operator is proposed by considering the interdependencies and variations to aggregate the different preferences represented in PHFS. Finally, an approach based on the WASPAS ("Weighted Arithmetic Sum Product Assessment") method is presented to rank the different objects. The proposed framework is demonstrated with a numerical example and compares their results with the several existing studies' results to reveal the framework's superiority.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 55 条
[41]   Hesitant Fuzzy Sets: State of the Art and Future Directions [J].
Rodriguez, R. M. ;
Martinez, L. ;
Torra, V. ;
Xu, Z. S. ;
Herrera, F. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2014, 29 (06) :495-524
[42]   Regret and behavior: Comment on Zeelenberg and Pieters [J].
Roese, Neal J. ;
Summerville, Amy ;
Fessel, Florian .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 17 (01) :25-28
[43]  
Sirbiladze G., 2021, J COMPUTATIONAL COGN, DOI [10.47852/bonviewJCCE2022010103, DOI 10.47852/B0NVIEWJCCE2022010103]
[44]   New Correlation Coefficients Between Probabilistic Hesitant Fuzzy Sets and Their Applications in Cluster Analysis [J].
Song, Chenyang ;
Xu, Zeshui ;
Zhao, Hua .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2019, 21 (02) :355-368
[45]   A Novel Comparison of Probabilistic Hesitant Fuzzy Elements in Multi-Criteria Decision Making [J].
Song, Chenyang ;
Xu, Zeshui ;
Zhao, Hua .
SYMMETRY-BASEL, 2018, 10 (05)
[46]   The proof and measurement of association between two things [J].
Spearman, C .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1904, 15 :72-101
[47]  
Spence K.W., 1960, Behavior Theory and Learning: Selected Papers, DOI DOI 10.1037/11444-000
[48]  
Spence KW, 1956, Behavior theory and conditioning
[49]   Sequential funding the venture project or not? A prospect consensus process with probabilistic hesitant fuzzy preference information [J].
Tian, Xiaoli ;
Xu, Zeshui ;
Fujita, Hamido .
KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2018, 161 :172-184
[50]   Hesitant Fuzzy Sets [J].
Torra, Vicenc .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2010, 25 (06) :529-539