Teaching and practice patterns of lateral osteotomies for rhinoplasty

被引:3
作者
Chen, Jenny X. [1 ]
Kozin, Elliott D. [1 ]
Dedmon, Matthew M. [2 ]
Lee, Linda N. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Med Sch, Dept Otolaryngol, Boston, MA USA
[2] Vanderbilt Univ, 221 Kirkland Hall, Nashville, TN 37235 USA
[3] Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirm, Dept Otolaryngol, Div Facial Plast & Reconstruct Surg, 243 Charles St, Boston, MA 02114 USA
关键词
Surgical education; Facial plastic surgery; Intranasal osteotomies; Percutaneous osteotomies; Rhinoplasty;
D O I
10.1016/j.amjoto.2017.04.008
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Purpose: Lateral osteotomies are important during rhinoplasty and represent a challenging technique that otolaryngology and plastic surgery trainees must learn. The approaches for osteotomies are difficult to teach as they are accomplished through tactile feedback. Trends in teaching and practice patterns of lateral osteotomies are poorly described in the literature, and this study aims to fill this knowledge gap. Materials and methods: Members of the American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery were surveyed to characterize surgeon preferences for intranasal versus percutaneous lateral osteotomies and understand how techniques are taught. Results: Among surgeons who completed the survey (n = 172), 87% reported that they "always" or "mostly" use intranasal lateral osteotomies whereas only 8% "always" or "mostly" use percutaneous approaches. There is no significant trend towards changing osteotomy techniques when teaching trainees. Only 15% of respondents allow trainees to perform lateral osteotomies in more than half of operations. Conclusions: Most facial plastic surgeons prefer to use intranasal lateral osteotomies. However, many do not allow trainees to perform this critical step during rhinoplasty. This study has implications for both patient care and surgical education. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:498 / 500
页数:3
相关论文
共 7 条
  • [1] The lateral osteotomy in rhinoplasty: Clinical and radiographic rationale for osteotome selection
    Becker, DG
    McLaughlin, RB
    Loevner, LA
    Mang, A
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2000, 105 (05) : 1806 - 1816
  • [2] Development of a Temporal Bone Model for Transcanal Endoscopic Ear Surgery
    Dedmon, Matthew M.
    Kozin, Elliott D.
    Lee, Daniel J.
    [J]. OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2015, 153 (04) : 613 - 615
  • [3] Development and Validation of a High-Fidelity Porcine Laryngeal Surgical Simulator
    Dedmon, Matthew M.
    Paddle, Paul M.
    Phillips, Jeananne
    Kobayashi, Leo
    Franco, Ramon A.
    Song, Phillip C.
    [J]. OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2015, 153 (03) : 420 - 426
  • [4] Nasal osteotomies: A clinical comparison of the perforating methods versus the continuous technique
    Gryskiewicz, JM
    Gryskiewicz, KM
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2004, 113 (05) : 1445 - 1456
  • [5] An update on the lateral nasal osteotomy in rhinoplasty: An anatomic endoscopic comparison of the external versus the internal approach
    Rohrich, RJ
    Janis, JE
    Adams, WP
    Krueger, JK
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2003, 111 (07) : 2461 - 2462
  • [6] A randomised trial and economic evaluation of the effect of response mode on response rate, response bias, and item non-response in a survey of doctors
    Scott, Anthony
    Jeon, Sung-Hee
    Joyce, Catherine M.
    Humphreys, John S.
    Kalb, Guyonne
    Witt, Julia
    Leahy, Anne
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2011, 11
  • [7] Shedder CC, 2013, J SURG EDUC, V70, P466