Neuroscience and education: towards the construction of interactive bridges

被引:25
作者
Benaros, Sol [1 ]
Lipina, Sebastian J. [1 ]
Soledad Segretin, M. [1 ]
Julia Hermida, M. [1 ]
Colombo, Jorge A. [1 ]
机构
[1] CEMIC CONICET, UNA, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
关键词
Cognitive development; Cognitive psychology; Epistemology; Interdiscipline; Learning; Levels of analysis; COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE; RELEVANCE; PSYCHOLOGY;
D O I
10.33588/rn.5003.2009191
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction. The debates on the potential interdisciplinary association between neuroscience and education began approximately three decades ago. In order for the integration of neuroscientific and educational knowledge to impact on learning and teaching it would imply the consideration of the emergence of several cognitive and emotional processes during development, and the possibility to influence them through specific interventions. Aim. To examine epistemological and methodological implications and bridging requirements in the interaction between neuroscience, cognitive psychology and education. Development. A dynamic interdisciplinary bridging consists in the identification and reduction of different epistemological, methodological, technological and practical gaps between those disciplines. Furthermore, the consideration of complex phenomena, such as human development and learning processes in terms of multiple levels of analysis, may contribute to the enrichment of a critical dialogue, but also to generate genuine integrated interventions. Historical and current conceptual perspectives attempting to bridge neuroscience and education are described. Conclusions. At present, interdisciplinary efforts between neuroscience and education are at a preliminary stage. In this context, bridging requires conceptual and methodological approaches that consider the complexity of developmental and learning phenomena and the participation of actors from different fields, instead of unique bridges. This paper intends to consider several basic principles aimed at developing a dynamic integration that assesses the complexity of development, learning and teaching processes.
引用
收藏
页码:179 / 186
页数:8
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]   Don't forget about levels of explanation Discussion [J].
Anderson, Mike ;
Reid, Corinne .
CORTEX, 2009, 45 (04) :560-561
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2002, REV PSIQUIATRIA FACU
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1997, EDUC RES-UK, DOI DOI 10.3102/0013189X026008004
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2007, Educating the human brain
[5]  
[Anonymous], REPORT IMPLICATIONS
[6]   Bridges over troubled waters: Education and cognitive neuroscience [J].
Ansari, D ;
Coch, D .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2006, 10 (04) :146-151
[7]  
Atherton M., 2005, Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Montreal
[8]  
Battro A., 2008, The educated brain: Essays in neuroeducation
[9]   Making cognitive neuroscience educationally relevant: Creating bidirectional collaborations between educational psychology and cognitive neuroscience [J].
Berninger, VW ;
Corina, D .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 1998, 10 (03) :343-354
[10]   THE UNIT OF ANALYSIS AND THE CONSTRUCTIVE PROCESSES OF THE LEARNER - KEY CONCEPTS FOR EDUCATIONAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY [J].
BERNINGER, VW ;
ABBOTT, RD .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGIST, 1992, 27 (02) :223-242