Escitalopram dose-response revisited: an alternative psychometric approach to evaluate clinical effects of escitalopram compared to citalopram and placebo in patients with major depression

被引:66
作者
Bech, P [1 ]
Tanghoj, P
Cialdella, P
Andersen, HF
Pedersen, AG
机构
[1] Frederiksborg Cent Cty Hosp, Psychiat Res Unit, DK-3400 Hillerod, Denmark
[2] H Lundbeck, Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
diagnostic instruments; dose responsiveness; major depression; unidimensionality;
D O I
10.1017/s1461145704004365
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
In continuation of a previous psychometric analysis of dose-response data for citalopram in depression, the corresponding stud), data for escitalopram is of interest since escitalopram is the active enantiomer of citalopram and because citalopram was used as the active control. Revisiting those corresponding data, the psychometric properties of the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Scale (MADRS) and the Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD) were investigated by focusing on the unidimensional HAMD(6), and MADRS(6). Effect sizes were calculated and compared for two dosages of escitalopram (10 mg and 20 mg daily) and between each of these two dosages and 40 mg citalopram daily. The results showed that the three depression scales MADRS(6), MADRS(10) and HAMD(6) were psychometrically acceptable (coefficient of homogeneity of 0.40 or higher). In the severely depressed patients (MADRS(10) greater than or equal to 30) a rather clear dose-response relationship for escitalopram was seen on all three scales after 6 and 8 wk of therapy. Thus, the effect size for 10 mg escitalopram ranged from 0.28 to 0.38 while the effect sizes for 20 mg escitalopram raged from 0.57 to 0.77. This difference was statistically significant (p < 0.01). The effect size for 40 mg citalopram ranged from 0.36 to 0.47, which is within the range found for 40 mg citalopram in our previous dose-response analysis of citalopram after 6 wk of therapy. The numerically largest difference between 20 mg escitalopram and 40 mg citalopram was seen after 8 wk of therapy for MADRS(10) (effect size 0.71 vs. 0.37). An item analysis identified 'suicidal thoughts' to be the most discriminating item in this respect. These results for the severely depressed patients were confirmed by the patients' self-reported quality of life evaluation. When all included patients were analysed, however, no clear dose-response relationship was seen. In conclusion, a dose-response relationship for escitalopram was seen in the severely depressed patients on all outcome scales after 6 and 8 wk of treatment. After 8 wk of treatment 20 mg escitalopram was superior to 40 mg citalopram, but not after 2 wk of treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:283 / 290
页数:8
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
American Psychological Association, 2013, DIAGN STAT MAN MENT, DOI [10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596.744053, DOI 10.1176/APPI.BOOKS.9780890425596.744053, 10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596]
[2]  
ANGST J, 1993, CLIN NEUROPHARMACOL, V16, pS55
[3]  
[Anonymous], EUR NEUROPSYCHOPHARM, DOI DOI 10.1016/0924-977X(94)90093-0
[4]  
Bech P, 2001, INT J NEUROPSYCHOPH, V4, P337, DOI 10.1017/S1461145701002565
[5]   Citalopram dose-response revisited using an alternative psychometric approach to evaluate clinical effects of four fixed citalopram doses compared to placebo in patients with major depression [J].
Bech, P ;
Tanghoj, P ;
Andersen, HF ;
Overo, K .
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2002, 163 (01) :20-25
[6]   Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of fluoxetine v. placebo and tricyclic antidepressants in the short-term treatment of major depression [J].
Bech, P ;
Cialdella, P ;
Haugh, MC ;
Birkett, MA ;
Hours, A ;
Boissel, JP ;
Tollefson, GD .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2000, 176 :421-428
[7]   THE HAMILTON DEPRESSION SCALE - EVALUATION OF OBJECTIVITY USING LOGISTIC-MODELS [J].
BECH, P ;
ALLERUP, P ;
GRAM, LF ;
REISBY, N ;
ROSENBERG, R ;
JACOBSEN, O ;
NAGY, A .
ACTA PSYCHIATRICA SCANDINAVICA, 1981, 63 (03) :290-299
[8]  
BECH P, IN PRESS CNS DRUGS
[9]  
BECH P, 2002, BIOL PSYCHIAT, V2, P25
[10]   Fixed-dose trial of the single isomer SSRI escitalopram in depressed outpatients [J].
Burke, WJ ;
Gergel, I ;
Bose, A .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2002, 63 (04) :331-336