Transcranial direct current stimulation for spinal cord injury-associated neuropathic pain

被引:12
作者
Li, Caixia [1 ]
Jirachaipitak, Sukunya [2 ]
Wrigley, Paul [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Xu, Hua [1 ]
Euasobhon, Pramote [2 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Univ Tradit Chinese Med, Yueyang Hosp Integrated Tradit Chinese & Western, Dept Anesthesiol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Mahidol Univ, Fac Med, Dept Anesthesiol, Siriraj Hosp, 2 Wanglang Rd, Bangkok 10700, Thailand
[3] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Northern Clin Sch, Pain Management Res Inst, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Kolling Inst, Northern Sydney Local Hlth Dist, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[5] Univ Sydney, Royal North Shore Hosp, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
Chronic Pain; Deep Brain Stimulation; Electric Stimulation Therapy; Electrodes; Implanted; Motor Cortex; Neuralgia; Spinal Cord Injuries; Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation; Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation; Treatment Outcome; NONINVASIVE BRAIN-STIMULATION; HUMAN MOTOR CORTEX; DC-STIMULATION; EXCITABILITY SHIFTS; CORTICAL PLASTICITY; NEUROPLASTICITY; TDCS; MODULATION; MECHANISMS; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.3344/kjp.2021.34.2.156
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Several types of pain occur following spinal cord injury (SCI); however, neuropathic pain (NP) is one of the most intractable. Invasive and non-invasive brain stimulation techniques have been studied in clinical trials to treat chronic NP following SCI. The evidence for invasive stimulation including motor cortex and deep brain stimulation via the use of implanted electrodes to reduce SCI-related NP remains limited, due to the small scale of existing studies. The lower risk of complications associated with non-invasive stimulation, including transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), provide potentially attractive alternative central neuromodulation techniques. Compared to rTMS, tDCS is technically easier to apply, more affordable, available, and potentially feasible for home use. Accordingly, several new studies have investigated the efficacy of tDCS to treat NP after SCI. In this review, articles relating to the mechanisms, clinical efficacy and safety of tDCS on SCI-related NP were searched from inception to December 2019. Six clinical trials, including five randomized placebo-controlled trials and one prospective controlled trial, were included for evidence specific to the efficacy of tDCS for treating SCI-related NP. The mechanisms of action of tDCS are complex and not fully understood. Several factors including stimulation parameters and individual patient characteristics may affect the efficacy of tDCS intervention. Current evidence to support the efficacy of utilizing tDCS for relieving chronic NP after SCI remains limited. Further strong evidence is needed to confirm the efficacy of tDCS intervention for treating SCI-related NP.
引用
收藏
页码:156 / 164
页数:9
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]   Ephaptic coupling of cortical neurons [J].
Anastassiou, Costas A. ;
Perin, Rodrigo ;
Markram, Henry ;
Koch, Christof .
NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 2011, 14 (02) :217-U304
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2001, PAIN CLIN UPDATES
[3]   Low intensity transcranial electric stimulation: Safety, ethical, legal regulatory and application guidelines [J].
Antal, A. ;
Alekseichuk, I. ;
Bikson, M. ;
Brockmoeller, J. ;
Brunoni, A. R. ;
Chen, R. ;
Cohen, L. G. ;
Dowthwaite, G. ;
Ellrich, J. ;
Floeel, A. ;
Fregni, F. ;
George, M. S. ;
Hamilton, R. ;
Haueisen, J. ;
Herrmann, C. S. ;
Hummel, F. C. ;
Lefaucheur, J. P. ;
Liebetanz, D. ;
Loo, C. K. ;
McCaig, C. D. ;
Miniussi, C. ;
Miranda, P. C. ;
Moliadze, V. ;
Nitsche, M. A. ;
Nowak, R. ;
Padberg, F. ;
Pascual-Leone, A. ;
Poppendieck, W. ;
Priori, A. ;
Rossi, S. ;
Rossini, P. M. ;
Rothwell, J. ;
Rueger, M. A. ;
Ruffini, G. ;
Schellhorn, K. ;
Siebner, H. R. ;
Ugawa, Y. ;
Wexler, A. ;
Ziemann, U. ;
Hallett, M. ;
Paulus, W. .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2017, 128 (09) :1774-1809
[4]   Towards unravelling task-related modulations of neuroplastic changes induced in the human motor cortex [J].
Antal, Andrea ;
Terney, Daniella ;
Poreisz, Csaba ;
Paulus, Walter .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2007, 26 (09) :2687-2691
[5]   Non-synaptic mechanisms underlie the after-effects of cathodal transcutaneous direct current stimulation of the human brain [J].
Ardolino, G ;
Bossi, B ;
Barbieri, S ;
Priori, A .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 2005, 568 (02) :653-663
[6]   A systematic review on reporting and assessment of adverse effects associated with transcranial direct current stimulation [J].
Brunoni, Andre Russowsky ;
Amadera, Joao ;
Berbel, Bruna ;
Volz, Magdalena Sarah ;
Rizzerio, Brenno Gomes ;
Fregni, Felipe .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2011, 14 (08) :1133-1145
[7]   Surgical Neurostimulation for Spinal Cord Injury [J].
Chari, Aswin ;
Hentall, Ian D. ;
Papadopoulos, Marios C. ;
Pereira, Erlick A. C. .
BRAIN SCIENCES, 2017, 7 (02)
[8]   A common polymorphism in the brain-derived neurotrophic factor gene (BDNF) modulates human cortical plasticity and the response to rTMS [J].
Cheeran, Binith ;
Talelli, Penelope ;
Mori, Francesco ;
Koch, Giacomo ;
Suppa, Antonio ;
Edwards, Mark ;
Houlden, Henry ;
Bhatia, Kailash ;
Greenwood, Richard ;
Rothwell, John C. .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 2008, 586 (23) :5717-5725
[9]   CONTROLLED TRIAL OF THERAPEUTIC EFFECTS OF POLARIZATION OF BRAIN DEPRESSIVE-ILLNESS [J].
COSTAIN, R ;
REDFEARN, JW ;
LIPPOLD, OCJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 1964, 110 (469) :786-&
[10]   Integrated regulation of signal coding and plasticity by NMDA receptors at a central synapse [J].
D'Angelo, E ;
Rossi, P .
NEURAL PLASTICITY, 1998, 6 (03) :8-16