Comparison of 1-Level Versus 2-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: Clinical and Radiographic Follow-Up at 60 Months

被引:44
|
作者
Zigler, Jack E. [1 ]
Rogers, Roger Warren [2 ]
Ohnmeiss, Donna D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Texas Back Inst, 6020W Parker Rd 200, Plano, TX 75093 USA
[2] Texas Back Inst Res Fdn, Plano, TX USA
关键词
anterior cervical fusion; anterior plate; cervical spine; clinical outcome; INVESTIGATIONAL-DEVICE-EXEMPTION; DEGENERATIVE DISC DISEASE; INTERBODY FUSION; PRODISC-C; ARTHROPLASTY; MULTICENTER; REPLACEMENT; ADJACENT; ALLOGRAFT; SPINE;
D O I
10.1097/BRS.0000000000001263
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design.This study represents a posthoc analysis of data collected from 2 control arms of a prospective, randomized study.Objective.The purpose of this study was to compare results of patients undergoing 1- versus 2-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).Summary of Background Data.For single-level ACDF, reported outcomes have generally been good; however, results for 2 levels have been less consistent.Methods.This 60-month follow-up study was based on data from the prospective Food and Drug Administration regulated Mobi-C artificial disc trial. Serving as the control, ACDF was performed at 1 level in 81 patients and 2 levels in 105 patients. Study selection criteria, fusion technique, and outcome measures were identical, with the only exception being the number of levels that were pathological and operated.Results.Neck Disability Index (NDI) scores, visual analog scales assessing neck and arm pain, and SF-12 scores improved significantly in both groups. Significant differences were observed between groups on NDI and SF-12 PCS scores through 60 months. Fusion rates were 93.3% in the 1-level group and 86.1% in the 2-level (60 months, not significantly different). Adjacent segment degeneration occurred in 54.7% of patients at the superior level and 44.7% at the inferior segment in the 1-level group and 70.8%, and 55.0% respectively in 2-level patients (trend at superior level; 0.05<P<0.10). Subsequent index level surgery was performed in 11.1% of single-level patients versus 16.2% of the 2-level group (not significantly different).Conclusion.One- and 2-level ACDF groups improved significantly and maintained improvement throughout 60 month follow-up. When comparing groups, outcomes were often similar, though the 1-level group demonstrated higher fusion rates at 6 and 12 months, greater improvement in NDI scores from 18 to 60-month follow-up, and greater improvement in SF-12 PCS from 12 to 60 months.Level of Evidence: 2
引用
收藏
页码:463 / 469
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Stand-Alone Cage Versus Anterior Plating for 1-Level and 2-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Zavras, Athan G.
    Nolte, Michael T.
    Sayari, Arash J.
    Singh, Kern
    Colman, Matthew W.
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2022, 35 (04): : 155 - 165
  • [2] Prospective, Randomized Comparison of Cervical Total Disk Replacement Versus Anterior Cervical Fusion Results at 48 Months Follow-up
    Hisey, Michael S.
    Bae, Hyun W.
    Davis, Reginald J.
    Gaede, Steven
    Hoffman, Greg
    Kim, Kee D.
    Nunley, Pierce D.
    Peterson, Daniel
    Rashbaum, Ralph F.
    Stokes, John
    Ohnmeiss, Donna D.
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2015, 28 (04): : E237 - E243
  • [3] Cervical radiographic parameters in 1-and 2-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion
    Gillis, Christopher C.
    Kaszuba, Megan C.
    Traynelis, Vincent C.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2016, 25 (04) : 421 - 429
  • [4] The Effect of Dynamic Versus Static Plating Systems on Fusion Rates and Complications in 1-Level and/or 2-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion A Systematic Review
    Schroeder, Gregory D.
    Kepler, Christopher K.
    Hollern, Douglas A.
    Rodrigues-Pinto, Ricardo
    Kurd, Mark F.
    Wilson, Jefferson R.
    Maltenfort, Mitchell G.
    Paul, Jonathan T.
    Fleischman, Andrew N.
    Dwight, Kathryn
    Millhouse, Paul W.
    Vaccaro, Alexander R.
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2017, 30 (01): : 20 - 26
  • [5] Artificial Disk Replacement Combined With Fusion Versus 2-Level Fusion in Cervical 2-Level Disk Disease With a 5-Year Follow-up
    Ji, Gyu Yeul
    Oh, Chang Hyun
    Shin, Dong Ah
    Ha, Yoon
    Yi, Seong
    Kim, Keung Nyun
    Shin, Hyun Cheol
    Yoon, Do Heum
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2017, 30 (05): : E620 - E627
  • [6] Comparison of dynamic cervical implant versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the treatment of single-level cervical degenerative disc disease: A five-year follow-up
    Zhu, Ce
    Yang, Xi
    Wang, Lei
    Hu, Bo-wen
    Liu, Li-min
    Wang, Lin-nan
    Liu, Hao
    Song, Yue-ming
    CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 164 : 103 - 107
  • [7] Biomechanical Comparison of 1-Level Corpectomy and 2-Level Discectomy for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Finite Element Analysis
    Ouyang, Pengrong
    Li, Jialiang
    He, Xijing
    Dong, Hui
    Zang, Quanjin
    Li, Haopeng
    Jin, Zhongmin
    MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR, 2020, 26
  • [8] Comparison of Hybrid Constructs with 2-Level Artificial Disc Replacement and 2-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Surgical Reconstruction of the Cervical Spine: A Kinematic Study in Whole Cadavers
    Liu, Baoge
    Zeng, Zheng
    Van Hoof, Tom
    Kalala, Jean Pierre
    Liu, Zhenyu
    Wu, Bingxuan
    MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR, 2015, 21 : 1031 - 1037
  • [9] A Comparison of Patients Who Have Undergone 1-Level Versus 2-Level Prodisc Arthroplasty A Prospective Study With Minimum of 5-Year Follow-up
    Yue, James
    Zhang, Kai
    Bai, Harrison X.
    Du, Jerry
    Cammisa, Frank
    Abjornson, Celeste
    Mo, Fred
    SPINE, 2013, 38 (14) : 1194 - 1198
  • [10] Clinical Outcomes After Four-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
    Kreitz, Tyler M.
    Hollern, Douglas A.
    Padegimas, Eric M.
    Schroeder, Gregory D.
    Kepler, Christopher K.
    Vaccaro, Alexander R.
    Hilibrand, Alan S.
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2018, 8 (08) : 776 - 783