RETRACTED: Comparison of a Small Dose of Oxycodone and Sufentanil for the Prevention of Sufentanil-Induced Cough during General Anesthesia Induction: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial (Retracted Article)

被引:2
作者
Shi, Lingli [1 ]
Liu, Lu [1 ]
He, Yong [2 ]
Yang, Yuling [2 ]
Ni, Huanhuan [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Med Univ, Childrens Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Nanjing 210017, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 2, Dept Anesthesiol, Nanjing 210003, Peoples R China
关键词
FENTANYL; PRETREATMENT; PROPOFOL;
D O I
10.1155/2022/7924643
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background. Sufentanil is widely used during anesthesia induction. However, it can cause coughing via different mechanisms. This study is aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of a small dose of oxycodone and sufentanil in suppressing sufentanil-induced cough (SIC) during general anesthesia induction. Methods. Of the 174 patients scheduled for elective surgery, 144 were eligible and randomly divided into 3 groups (n=48). Five minutes before sufentanil bolus (0.4 mu g/kg), patients in group O received 0.02 mg/kg oxycodone intravenously within 5 s, those in group S received 0.02 mu g/kg sufentanil within 5 s, and those in group N received an equal volume of 0.9% normal saline within 5 s. Sufentanil was diluted to 5 mu g/ml and administered within 5 s after pretreatment. The incidence and severity of cough in the three groups were evaluated within 1 minute after sufentanil injection during the anesthesia induction. Their mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) were recorded at T0 (after entering the operation), T1 (3 minutes after pretreatment), T2 (before intubation), and T3 (1 minute after intubation). Results. The incidences of cough in group N, group O, and group S were 20 (41.6%), 7 (14.5%), and 6 (12.5%), respectively. Compared with group N, patients from group O and group S exhibited significantly reduced incidence and severity of cough, and the severity of cough in group O and group S was significantly reduced compared with group N (P < 0.05). No significant differences in the rangeability of MAP and HR were noted at the four time points in the three groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion. Preconditioning using intravenous oxycodone (0.02 mg/kg) or sufentanil (0.02 mu g/kg) could represent an effective approach to reducing SIC in anesthesia induction and was associated with relatively stable hemodynamic state during general anesthesia. This trial is registered at Chinese Clinical Trial Registry with registration number .
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Comparison of the incidence and severity of cough induced by sufentanil and fentanyl: a prospective, randomised, double-blind study [J].
Agarwal, A. ;
Gautam, S. ;
Nath, S. S. ;
Gupta, D. ;
Singh, U. .
ANAESTHESIA, 2007, 62 (12) :1230-1232
[2]  
Agarwal A, 2003, CAN J ANAESTH, V50, P297, DOI 10.1007/BF03017801
[3]  
An LJ, 2015, INT J CLIN EXP MED, V8, P13864
[4]   Difficult or impossible ventilation after sufentanil-induced anesthesia is caused primarily by vocal cord closure [J].
Bennett, JA ;
Abrams, JT ;
VanRiper, DF ;
Horrow, JC .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1997, 87 (05) :1070-1074
[5]  
[卞清明 Bian Qingming], 2018, [中华麻醉学杂志, Chinese Journal of Anesthesiology], V38, P800
[6]   Comparing the different oxycodone doses of prevent oxycodone for prevention of preventing fentanyl-induced cough during induction of general anaesthesia [J].
Dai, Bizhao ;
Cao, Xiaofei .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2020, 74 (12)
[7]  
Du BX, 2014, INT J CLIN EXP MED, V7, P826
[8]  
El Baissari Mabelle C. Tannous, 2014, Middle East Journal of Anesthesiology, V22, P449
[9]   Dose selection of central or peripheral administration of sufentanil affect opioid induced cough?: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial [J].
He, Jiabei ;
Zhu, Ling ;
Zhu, Huichen ;
Gu, Xinyu ;
Li, Peiying ;
Yang, Yuting ;
Yang, Liqun .
BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2018, 18
[10]   The effect of pre-emptive use of minimal dose fentanyl on fentanyl-induced coughing [J].
Hung, K. -C. ;
Chen, C. -W. ;
Lin, V. C. -H. ;
Weng, H. -C. ;
Hsieh, S. -W. .
ANAESTHESIA, 2010, 65 (01) :4-7