PERFORMANCE COMPARISON OF TWO MEDIA DURING STARCH-PROTEIN SEPARATION OF CHICKPEA FLOUR USING A HYDROCYCLONE

被引:7
作者
Emami, Shahram [1 ]
Tabil, Lope G. [2 ]
Tyler, Robert T. [3 ]
机构
[1] Agr & Agri Food Canada, Guelph Food Res Ctr, Guelph, ON N1G 5C9, Canada
[2] Univ Saskatchewan, Dept Agr & Bioresource Engn, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
[3] Univ Saskatchewan, Dept Food & Bioprod Sci, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1745-4530.2008.00300.x
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Chickpea flour was suspended in isopropyl alcohol or deionized water at three concentrations and fractionated to the underflow (starch fraction) and the overflow (protein fraction) using a hydrocyclone. The separation using deionized water resulted in higher starch content in the underflow and higher protein content in the overflow than using isopropyl alcohol. Deionized water resulted in a greater starch separation efficiency (96.3-97.8%) and slightly lower protein separation efficiency (70.4-73.3%) than did isopropyl alcohol. The geometric mean diameter (GMD) of the overflow and underflow increased with a decrease in inlet pressure. The GMD of the underflow fraction in deionized water (26.27-31.28 mu m) was greater than that in isopropyl alcohol (17.09-21.12 mu m). In both media, the estimated centrifugal and drag forces increased with a decrease of inlet pressure. The centrifugal force applied to the particles in deionized water (1.32 x 10-6 -1.67 x 10-6 N) was greater than that in isopropyl alcohol (0.54 x 10-6 -0.76 x 10-6 N). Therefore, deionized water resulted in markedly higher starch separation efficiency. However, in isopropyl alcohol, a higher drag force was applied to the particles, and the protein separation efficiency was slightly greater than in deionized water. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS The separation of starch and protein from chickpea flour in suspension of isopropyl alcohol or deionized water using a hydrocyclone was investigated. Fractionation from the deionized water suspension resulted in higher starch content in the underflow and higher protein content in the overflow than from isopropyl alcohol. The method using deionized water resulted in higher starch separation efficiency; the separation using isopropyl alcohol resulted in slightly higher protein separation efficiency. The differences in the separation efficiencies of the two media were related to the variations in forces applied to the particles in the hydrocyclone. The magnitude of forces applied to the starch granules and protein particles was estimated.
引用
收藏
页码:728 / 744
页数:17
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
*AACC, 2000, METH 08 16 ASH SOY F
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2007, 'ASABE Standards 2007', P646
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1980, FUNDAMENTAL U PHYS
[4]  
AOAC International, 2005, Official Method 925.10. Solid (Total) and Moisture in Flour, V18th
[5]  
Bradley D., 1965, The Hydrocyclone
[6]  
CHEREMISINOFF PN, 1995, PROCESSING ENG HDB S
[7]  
DAY RW, 1997, HDB SEPARATION TECHN
[8]  
Earle R.L., 1983, Unit Operations in Food Processing
[9]  
Egan H., 1981, Pearson's Chemical Analysis of Foods
[10]  
GRADY S, 2006, YEAR UNKNOWN SMALL D