Grey-scale reversed radiographic display in the detection of approximal caries

被引:19
作者
Haak, R [1 ]
Wicht, MJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cologne, Dept Operat Dent & Periodontol, Ctr Dent Med, D-50931 Cologne, Germany
关键词
digital radiography; dental; image processing; dental caries; diagnostic systems; ROC curve;
D O I
10.1016/j.jdent.2004.08.003
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives. Purpose of this study was to determine the influence of greyscale reversal of digital radiographic images on the detection of proximal caries. Methods. Five observers assessed digital bitewing radiographs (Sidexis((R)), Sirona) of 320 unrestored surfaces of extracted posterior teeth embedded in 20 models, simulating pairing of maxillary and mandibular arches, using a six-category caries rating scale. Images were displayed in normal [N] and inverse [IN] mode at different image sizes (display ratio: 1:1, 1:2, 1:7) on a cathode-ray tube monitor (Nokia 446 XS) and a TFT display (Panasonic LC 50 S). Validation standard was defined as histological lesion depth. Validity was expressed as areas under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) calculated for two levels of histological caries penetration: presence of caries and presence of a dentine lesion. The factors 'inverse display', 'image size on-screen' 'display type' and 'disease cut-off' were analysed by repeated measures ANOVA. Results. Inverse image display significantly influenced the diagnostic validity (P=0.014), but a reduced accuracy was only seen at the lowest image size (AUC (SE): [N] 0.64 (0.02); [IN] 0.62 (0.02)). At the validation threshold 'dentine caries' approximal caries detection deteriorated when using grey-scale reversal (AUC (SE): [N] 0.71 (0.02); [IN] 0.69 (0.02)). Conclusions. In conclusion, grey-scale reversal of digital radiographs, did not optimise approximal caries detection and aggravated the detectability of dentinal lesions. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:65 / 71
页数:7
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1986, SMPTE J, V95, P693
[2]   Detectability of artificial periapical lesions using direct digital and conventional radiography [J].
Barbat, J ;
Messer, HH .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 1998, 24 (12) :837-842
[3]  
BARTEN PGJ, 1992, P SOC PHOTO-OPT INS, V1666, P57, DOI 10.1117/12.135956
[4]   CONTRAST THRESHOLDS OF THE HUMAN EYE [J].
BLACKWELL, HR .
JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1946, 36 (11) :624-643
[5]   DETECTION OF BULLOUS LUNG-DISEASE - CONVENTIONAL RADIOGRAPHY VS DIGITAL STORAGE PHOSPHOR RADIOGRAPHY [J].
BUCKLEY, KM ;
SCHAEFER, CM ;
GREENE, R ;
AGATSTON, S ;
FAY, J ;
LLEWELLYN, HJ ;
MROSE, HE ;
RUBENS, JR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1991, 156 (03) :467-470
[6]  
Dove S B, 1992, Dentomaxillofac Radiol, V21, P127
[7]   PERFORMANCE-CHARACTERISTICS AND IMAGE FIDELITY OF GRAY-SCALE MONITORS [J].
DWYER, SJ ;
STEWART, BK ;
SAYRE, JW ;
ABERLE, DR ;
BOECHAT, MI ;
HONEYMAN, JC ;
BOEHME, JM ;
ROEHRIG, H ;
JI, TL ;
BLAINE, GJ .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 1992, 12 (04) :765-772
[8]  
FRASER RG, 1983, RADIOLOGY, V148, P1
[9]   Influence of displayed image size on radiographic detection of approximal caries [J].
Haak, R ;
Wicht, MJ ;
Nowak, G ;
Hellmich, M .
DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2003, 32 (04) :242-246
[10]   Influence of room lighting on grey-scale perception with a CRT- and a TFT monitor display [J].
Haak, R ;
Wicht, MJ ;
Hellmich, M ;
Nowak, G ;
Noack, MJ .
DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2002, 31 (03) :193-197