A one-off wealth tax for Belgium: Revenue potential, distributional impact, and environmental effects

被引:10
作者
Apostel, Arthur [1 ]
O'Neill, Daniel W. [2 ]
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, HIVA Res Inst Work & Soc, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
[2] Univ Leeds, Sch Earth & Environm, Sustainabil Res Inst, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
关键词
Wealth tax; Wealth distribution; Belgium; Environmental effect; Revenue potential; Distributional impact; CARBON EMISSIONS; TOP TAIL; INEQUALITY; RICH; RESPONSES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107385
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Policymakers and economists are becoming increasingly concerned about wealth inequality. Here we estimate Belgium's wealth distribution - and based on this distribution - the revenue potential, distributional impact, and environmental effect of three proposals for a one-off Belgian wealth tax. Our method consists of (1) esti-mating the Belgian wealth distribution by extending survey data with a top-tail Pareto distribution based on a novel national rich list, and (2) combining the estimated wealth distribution with proposed tax configurations and published elasticities. There are four main results. First, the wealthiest 1% of households possess similar to 24% of total net wealth, substantially more than previous estimates suggest. Second, the revenue potential of a one-off tax is considerably higher than estimated by wealth tax advocates. Third, the distributional impact would be limited as the richest 1% of households would still possess at least 23% of total net wealth. Fourth, a one-off tax would likely reduce CO2 emissions by only 0.1-0.6%. Overall, our findings suggest a one-off wealth tax could finance over half of Belgium's COVID-19 costs, but would lead to only small reductions in wealth inequality and environmental impact. Ecological economists may therefore wish to pursue other policy proposals to achieve fair distribution and sustainable scale.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Who owns the wealth in tax havens? Macro evidence and implications for global inequality [J].
Alstadsaeter, Annette ;
Johannesen, Niels ;
Zucman, Gabriel .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2018, 162 :89-100
[2]   Looking for the missing rich: tracing the top tail of the wealth distribution [J].
Bach, Stefan ;
Thiemann, Andreas ;
Zucco, Aline .
INTERNATIONAL TAX AND PUBLIC FINANCE, 2019, 26 (06) :1234-1258
[3]   A Wealth Tax on the Rich to Bring Down Public Debt? Revenue and Distributional Effects of a Capital Levy in Germany [J].
Bach, Stefan ;
Beznoska, Martin ;
Steiner, Viktor .
FISCAL STUDIES, 2014, 35 (01) :67-89
[4]  
Boyce JK, 2007, RES SOC PROBL PUBLIC, V15, P267, DOI 10.1016/S0196-1152(07)15008-0
[5]   Wealth inequality in Central and Eastern Europe: Evidence from household survey and rich lists' data combined* [J].
Brzezinski, Michal ;
Salach, Katarzyna ;
Wronski, Marcin .
ECONOMICS OF TRANSITION AND INSTITUTIONAL CHANGE, 2020, 28 (04) :637-660
[6]   Do wealth distributions follow power laws? Evidence from 'rich lists' [J].
Brzezinski, Michal .
PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2014, 406 :155-162
[7]   Reducing Inequalities within Countries: Assessing the Potential of the Sustainable Development Goals [J].
Chancel, Lucas ;
Hough, Alex ;
Voituriez, Tancrede .
GLOBAL POLICY, 2018, 9 (01) :5-16
[8]   Power-Law Distributions in Empirical Data [J].
Clauset, Aaron ;
Shalizi, Cosma Rohilla ;
Newman, M. E. J. .
SIAM REVIEW, 2009, 51 (04) :661-703
[9]   Assessing the degrowth discourse: A review and analysis of academic degrowth policy proposals [J].
Cosme, Ines ;
Santos, Rui ;
O'Neill, Daniel W. .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 149 :321-334
[10]  
Costanza Robert., 1989, ECOL ECON, V1, P1