Trends in live birth prevalence of Down syndrome in the Northern Netherlands 1987-96: the impact of screening and prenatal diagnosis

被引:0
作者
Wortelboer, MJM
de Wolf, BTHM
Verschuuren-Bemelmans, CC
Reefhuis, J
Mantingh, A
Beekhuis, JR
Cornel, MC
机构
[1] Univ Groningen Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Antenatal Diag Unit, NL-9700 RB Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Groningen, Dept Med Genet, NL-9700 AB Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
prenatal diagnosis; maternal serum screening; Down syndrome; live birth prevalence; cost-benefit;
D O I
10.1002/1097-0223(200009)20:9<709::AID-PD910>3.0.CO;2-J
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
In the Northern Netherlands, we examined the live birth prevalence of Down syndrome (DS) and the impact of maternal serum screening (MSS) and prenatal cytogenetic diagnosis (PCD) during the period 1987-96. In this period the live birth prevalence, based on the maternal age distribution and the age specific risk of delivering a child with DS was expected to increase from 1.26 in 1987 to 1.62 in 1996. The introduction of MSS in 1991 made PCD available to women of all ages. Nevertheless, the utilization of PCD remained very stable. In 1991, 4.7% of pregnant women underwent a diagnostic test. In 1996 this percentage was 6.4%. As a result of MSS and PCD, the live birth prevalence of DS was 19% lower than expected (p<0.01). Despite utilization of PCD based on opting-in and a discouraging government policy regarding the offer of MSS, the percentage of DS cases detected by PCD increased from of 17% during the period 1987-90 to 27% in the period 1991-96 when MSS was available. The percentages have been corrected for spontaneous pregnancy loss. From a medical and financial point of view, MSS was the most cost-effective indication for PCD. However, the potential of reducing the birth prevalence of DS is limited by the low utilization of MSS and PCD by pregnant women. Copyright (C) 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:709 / 713
页数:5
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] Beekhuis J R, 1993, Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd, V137, P1303
  • [2] BORST E, 1998, INT J RISK SAFETY ME, V11, P129
  • [3] Carothers AD, 1999, GENET EPIDEMIOL, V16, P179, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2272(1999)16:2<179::AID-GEPI5>3.3.CO
  • [4] 2-Z
  • [5] Cornel M C, 1990, Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd, V134, P1852
  • [6] DOWN-SYNDROME - EFFECTS OF DEMOGRAPHIC-FACTORS AND PRENATAL-DIAGNOSIS ON THE FUTURE LIVEBIRTH PREVALENCE
    CORNEL, MC
    BREED, ASPM
    BEEKHUIS, JR
    MEERMAN, GJT
    TENKATE, LP
    [J]. HUMAN GENETICS, 1993, 92 (02) : 163 - 168
  • [7] Crossley J A, 1994, J Med Screen, V1, P180
  • [8] ESTIMATING A WOMANS RISK OF HAVING A PREGNANCY ASSOCIATED WITH DOWNS-SYNDROME USING HER AGE AND SERUM ALPHA-FETOPROTEIN LEVEL
    CUCKLE, HS
    WALD, NJ
    THOMPSON, SG
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1987, 94 (05): : 387 - 402
  • [9] Dormandy E, 1999, BRIT MED J, V318, P805
  • [10] Hahn J A, 1993, Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol, V7, P450, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-3016.1993.tb00426.x