Life Cycle Assessment of Reprocessed Cross Laminated Timber in Latvia

被引:12
|
作者
Vamza, Ilze [1 ]
Diaz, Fabian [1 ]
Resnais, Peteris [2 ]
Radzina, Antra [1 ]
Blumberga, Dagnija [1 ]
机构
[1] Riga Tech Univ, Inst Energy Syst & Environm, 12-k1 Azenes St, LV-1048 Riga, Latvia
[2] SIA FUNDUSS, LV-4139 Drabesu Parish, Amatas Reg, Latvia
关键词
Avoided burden; construction; green buildings; eco-efficiency; engineered wood products; ENVIRONMENTAL-IMPACT; LCA; CONCRETE;
D O I
10.2478/rtuect-2021-0005
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
It is expected that Cross-laminated timber (CLT) and other engineered wood products will experience rapid growth in the coming years. Global population growth is requiring more housing units, at the same time the negative impact of construction industry cannot stay in the same level as today. Alternatives for concrete and steel reinforced structures are being explored. CLT has proven to be an excellent substitution for concrete regarding construction of buildings up to eight storeys high. In addition to much lower environmental impact, construction process using CLT takes significantly less time due to pre-cut shapes required for specific project. Despite mentioned benefits, there are considerable amount of CLT cuttings generated in this process. Due to irregular shape and small dimensions of these cuttings they are useless for further use in construction. By applying re-processing technology described in this paper, around 70 % of generated cuttings can be re-processed into new CLT panels. In this paper we are evaluating the environmental benefits of re-processing these cuttings into new CLT panels versus business-as-usual scenario with waste disposal. Life cycle assessment results showed significant reduction of environmental impact for the scenario of CLT cutting re-processing.
引用
收藏
页码:58 / 70
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Cross-Laminated Timber in the USA: Opportunity for Hardwoods?
    Omar Espinoza
    Urs Buehlmann
    Current Forestry Reports, 2018, 4 : 1 - 12
  • [22] Acoustic Characteristics of Cross-Laminated Timber Systems
    Di Bella, Antonino
    Mitrovic, Milica
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (14)
  • [23] Cross-Laminated Timber in the USA: Opportunity for Hardwoods?
    Espinoza, Omar
    Buehlmann, Urs
    CURRENT FORESTRY REPORTS, 2018, 4 (01): : 1 - 12
  • [24] Exploring the synergy between structural engineering design solutions and life cycle carbon footprint of cross-laminated timber in multi-storey buildings
    Dodoo, Ambrose
    Truong Nguyen
    Dorn, Michael
    Olsson, Anders
    Bader, Thomas K.
    WOOD MATERIAL SCIENCE & ENGINEERING, 2022, 17 (01) : 30 - 42
  • [25] COMPARATIVE LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT OF A MASS TIMBER BUILDING AND CONCRETE ALTERNATIVE
    Liang, Shaobo
    Gu, Hongmei
    Bergman, Richard
    Kelley, Stephen S.
    WOOD AND FIBER SCIENCE, 2020, 52 (02): : 217 - 229
  • [26] LCA of the timber sector in Ghana: preliminary life cycle impact assessment (LCIA)
    Eshun, John Frank
    Potting, Jose
    Leemans, Rik
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2011, 16 (07) : 625 - 638
  • [27] Life cycle assessment of Norwegian road tunnel
    Huang, Lizhen
    Bohne, Rolf Andre
    Bruland, Amund
    Jakobsen, Pal Drevland
    Lohne, Jardar
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2015, 20 (02) : 174 - 184
  • [28] Life cycle assessment and life cycle costing of sanitary ware manufacturing: A case study in China
    Lv, Jingxiang
    Gu, Fu
    Zhang, Wujie
    Guo, Jianfeng
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 238
  • [29] Comparative assessment of shape related cross-laminated timber building typologies focusing on environmental performance
    Leskovar, Vesna Zegarac
    Zigart, Maja
    Premrov, Miroslav
    Lukman, Rebeka Kovacic
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 216 : 482 - 494
  • [30] Mapping the scientific research of the life cycle assessment in the construction industry: A scientometric analysis
    Yilmaz, Yildiray
    Seyis, Senem
    BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 204