Life Cycle Assessment of Reprocessed Cross Laminated Timber in Latvia

被引:12
|
作者
Vamza, Ilze [1 ]
Diaz, Fabian [1 ]
Resnais, Peteris [2 ]
Radzina, Antra [1 ]
Blumberga, Dagnija [1 ]
机构
[1] Riga Tech Univ, Inst Energy Syst & Environm, 12-k1 Azenes St, LV-1048 Riga, Latvia
[2] SIA FUNDUSS, LV-4139 Drabesu Parish, Amatas Reg, Latvia
关键词
Avoided burden; construction; green buildings; eco-efficiency; engineered wood products; ENVIRONMENTAL-IMPACT; LCA; CONCRETE;
D O I
10.2478/rtuect-2021-0005
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
It is expected that Cross-laminated timber (CLT) and other engineered wood products will experience rapid growth in the coming years. Global population growth is requiring more housing units, at the same time the negative impact of construction industry cannot stay in the same level as today. Alternatives for concrete and steel reinforced structures are being explored. CLT has proven to be an excellent substitution for concrete regarding construction of buildings up to eight storeys high. In addition to much lower environmental impact, construction process using CLT takes significantly less time due to pre-cut shapes required for specific project. Despite mentioned benefits, there are considerable amount of CLT cuttings generated in this process. Due to irregular shape and small dimensions of these cuttings they are useless for further use in construction. By applying re-processing technology described in this paper, around 70 % of generated cuttings can be re-processed into new CLT panels. In this paper we are evaluating the environmental benefits of re-processing these cuttings into new CLT panels versus business-as-usual scenario with waste disposal. Life cycle assessment results showed significant reduction of environmental impact for the scenario of CLT cutting re-processing.
引用
收藏
页码:58 / 70
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cross-laminated timber for building construction: A life-cycle-assessment overview
    Younis, Adel
    Dodoo, Ambrose
    JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2022, 52
  • [2] Life cycle assessment of a residential building with cross-laminated timber structure in Granada-Spain
    Vidal, R.
    Sanchez-Pantoja, N.
    Martinez, G.
    INFORMES DE LA CONSTRUCCION, 2019, 71 (554)
  • [3] Comparative life cycle assessment of cross laminated timber building and concrete building with special focus on biogenic carbon
    Andersen, Julie Hansted
    Rasmussen, Nana Lin
    Ryberg, Morten Walbech
    ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2022, 254
  • [4] Life Cycle Assessment of Cross-Laminated Timber Transportation from Three Origin Points
    Hemmati, Mahboobeh
    Messadi, Tahar
    Gu, Hongmei
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (01)
  • [5] Comparative life cycle assessment of a reinforced concrete residential building with equivalent cross laminated timber alternatives in China
    Duan, Zhuocheng
    Huang, Qiong
    Sun, Qiming
    Zhang, Qi
    JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2022, 62
  • [6] Life cycle impacts of structural deterioration and seismic events on cross-laminated timber buildings
    Junda, Eknara
    Malaga-Chuquitaype, Christian
    JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2025, 104
  • [7] Life cycle performance of Cross Laminated Timber mid-rise residential buildings in Australia
    Jayalath, Amitha
    Navaratnam, Satheeskumar
    Ngo, Tuan
    Mendis, Priyan
    Hewson, Nick
    Aye, Lu
    ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2020, 223
  • [8] Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Cross-Laminated Timber (CLT) Produced in Western Washington: The Role of Logistics and Wood Species Mix
    Chen, Cindy X.
    Pierobon, Francesca
    Ganguly, Indroneil
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (05)
  • [9] Assessing Cross Laminated Timber (CLT) as an Alternative Material for Mid-Rise Residential Buildings in Cold Regions in China-A Life-Cycle Assessment Approach
    Liu, Ying
    Guo, Haibo
    Sun, Cheng
    Chang, Wen-Shao
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2016, 8 (10)
  • [10] Life Cycle Assessment on modern timber bridges
    Niu, Yishu
    Fink, Gerhard
    WOOD MATERIAL SCIENCE & ENGINEERING, 2019, 14 (04) : 212 - 225