Porosity management and control in powder bed fusion process through process-quality interactions

被引:32
|
作者
Xiao, Xinyi [1 ]
Roh, Byeong-Min [2 ]
Hamilton, Carter [1 ]
机构
[1] Miami Univ, Mech & Mfg Engn Dept, Oxford, OH USA
[2] Penn State Univ, Dept Mech Engn, State Coll, PA USA
关键词
Quantitative Model; Multi-dimensional Modeling; Porosity; Printable Zone; INCONEL; 718; PARAMETERS; MODEL; PREDICTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.cirpj.2022.04.005
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Laser Powder bed fusion (L-PBF) has gained much attention for its ability to manufacture high-precision and high-complexity metal components for the aircraft and automobile industries. However, to a certain degree, the print quality (shape, GD&T, mechanical property) is difficult to predict and control due to the multivariant processability. Recent research predominantly focuses on building a semantic/qualitative process relationship from the single/a few process parameters on the ultimate print qualities, such as thermal distortion failure/defect probabilities. However, such semantic/qualitative process relationships cannot reflect specific governing effects from process variables and provide an optimal selection of the parameters to ensure the build quality. Therefore, there is a strong need to develop a quantitative model within a process network and achieve a constant quality level by controlling the process parameter set. To address the aforementioned challenges, this research focuses on developing a multi-dimensional process-quality interaction model to predict and control the porosity of Titanium 6Al-4V in L-PBF. The process network is first derived from existing literature composing the potential, influential process parameters that can deviate the porosity level, such as laser power and scanning speed. Then the quantitative model is built based on a multi-dimensional quantitative modeling technique from a collection of experimental data. The multi-dimensional modeling provides an architecture that replaces the artificial neural network (ANN) or regression model to depict the mathematical relationship. The established quantitative process models analyze the intercorrelated effects from process parameters to the porosity. The printable zone can also be derived from such a quantitative model and visualized through a multi-dimension variable-control response graph to optimize the selection of process parameters. This would result in a comprehensive understanding of selecting the process parameters according to the desired porosity level and pave the path to fully control the metal L-PBF print qualities by adjusting the process variables. The experimental data also validate the proposed quantitative model to demonstrate its effectiveness and correctness.
引用
收藏
页码:120 / 128
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Investigating the effect of temperature on powder spreading behaviour in powder bed fusion additive manufacturing process by Discrete Element Method
    Ajabshir, Sina Zinatlou
    Hare, Colin
    Sofia, Daniele
    Barletta, Diego
    Poletto, Massimo
    POWDER TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 436
  • [42] Evaluation of Inconel 718 Metallic Powder to Optimize the Reuse of Powder and to Improve the Performance and Sustainability of the Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF) Process
    Gruber, Konrad
    Smolina, Irina
    Kasprowicz, Marcin
    Kurzynowski, Tomasz
    MATERIALS, 2021, 14 (06)
  • [43] Manufacturability study in laser powder bed fusion of biomedical Ti alloys for orthopedic implants: an investigation of mechanical properties, process-induced porosity and surface roughness
    Rehman, Mudassar
    Wang, Yanen
    Ishfaq, Kashif
    Yang, Haiou
    Mushtaq, Ray Tahir
    Kumar, M. Saravana
    Ahmed, Ammar
    RAPID PROTOTYPING JOURNAL, 2023, 29 (06) : 1299 - 1323
  • [44] Process Optimization of Inconel 718 Alloy Produced by Laser Powder Bed Fusion
    Hwang, Jiun-Ren
    Zheng, Jing-Yuan
    Kuo, Po-Chen
    Huang, Chou-Dian
    Fung, Chin-Ping
    METALS, 2022, 12 (09)
  • [45] Prediction of microstructure, residual stress, and deformation in laser powder bed fusion process
    Yang, Y. P.
    Jamshidinia, M.
    Boulware, P.
    Kelly, S. M.
    COMPUTATIONAL MECHANICS, 2018, 61 (05) : 599 - 615
  • [46] A Test Part for Evaluating the Accuracy and Resolution of a Polymer Powder Bed Fusion Process
    Allison, Jared
    Sharpe, Conner
    Seepersad, Carolyn Conner
    JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN, 2017, 139 (10)
  • [47] A new method for assessing the recyclability of powders within Powder Bed Fusion process
    Gorji, Nima E.
    Saxena, Prateek
    Corfield, Martin
    Clare, Adam
    Rueff, Jean-Pascal
    Bogan, Justin
    Gonzalez, Pierre G. M.
    Snelgrove, Matthew
    Hughes, Greg
    O'Connor, Robert
    Raghavendra, Ramesh
    Brabazon, Dermot
    MATERIALS CHARACTERIZATION, 2020, 161
  • [48] Dimensionless process development for lattice structure design in laser powder bed fusion
    Grossmann, Alexander
    Moelleney, Jan
    Froelich, Tilman
    Merschroth, Holger
    Felger, Julian
    Weigold, Matthias
    Sielaff, Axel
    Mittelstedt, Christian
    MATERIALS & DESIGN, 2020, 194
  • [49] Understanding and control of gas porosity in metal laser powder-bed fusion additive manufacturing
    Laskowski, Robert
    Mikula, Jakub
    Vastola, Guglielmo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER INTEGRATED MANUFACTURING, 2025,
  • [50] Optimal Process Conditions for Powder Bed Fusion and Analysis of Properties of Maraging Steel
    Jo, A. Ra
    An, Ji Seob
    Kim, Sun Hyung
    Park, Dong Yong
    Moon, Young Hoon
    Hwang, Sun Kwang
    METALS AND MATERIALS INTERNATIONAL, 2023, 29 (10) : 2865 - 2877