Porosity management and control in powder bed fusion process through process-quality interactions

被引:32
|
作者
Xiao, Xinyi [1 ]
Roh, Byeong-Min [2 ]
Hamilton, Carter [1 ]
机构
[1] Miami Univ, Mech & Mfg Engn Dept, Oxford, OH USA
[2] Penn State Univ, Dept Mech Engn, State Coll, PA USA
关键词
Quantitative Model; Multi-dimensional Modeling; Porosity; Printable Zone; INCONEL; 718; PARAMETERS; MODEL; PREDICTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.cirpj.2022.04.005
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Laser Powder bed fusion (L-PBF) has gained much attention for its ability to manufacture high-precision and high-complexity metal components for the aircraft and automobile industries. However, to a certain degree, the print quality (shape, GD&T, mechanical property) is difficult to predict and control due to the multivariant processability. Recent research predominantly focuses on building a semantic/qualitative process relationship from the single/a few process parameters on the ultimate print qualities, such as thermal distortion failure/defect probabilities. However, such semantic/qualitative process relationships cannot reflect specific governing effects from process variables and provide an optimal selection of the parameters to ensure the build quality. Therefore, there is a strong need to develop a quantitative model within a process network and achieve a constant quality level by controlling the process parameter set. To address the aforementioned challenges, this research focuses on developing a multi-dimensional process-quality interaction model to predict and control the porosity of Titanium 6Al-4V in L-PBF. The process network is first derived from existing literature composing the potential, influential process parameters that can deviate the porosity level, such as laser power and scanning speed. Then the quantitative model is built based on a multi-dimensional quantitative modeling technique from a collection of experimental data. The multi-dimensional modeling provides an architecture that replaces the artificial neural network (ANN) or regression model to depict the mathematical relationship. The established quantitative process models analyze the intercorrelated effects from process parameters to the porosity. The printable zone can also be derived from such a quantitative model and visualized through a multi-dimension variable-control response graph to optimize the selection of process parameters. This would result in a comprehensive understanding of selecting the process parameters according to the desired porosity level and pave the path to fully control the metal L-PBF print qualities by adjusting the process variables. The experimental data also validate the proposed quantitative model to demonstrate its effectiveness and correctness.
引用
收藏
页码:120 / 128
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Formation of keyhole and lack of fusion pores during the laser powder bed fusion process
    Shrestha, Subin
    Chou, Kevin
    MANUFACTURING LETTERS, 2022, 32 : 19 - 23
  • [32] Relationships between the characteristics of porosity, melt pool and process parameters in laser powder bed fusion Al-Zn alloy
    Wang, Tingting
    Wang, Yilong
    Chen, Changpeng
    Zhu, Haihong
    JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING PROCESSES, 2021, 68 : 1236 - 1244
  • [33] Advancing laser powder bed fusion with non-spherical powder: Powder-process-structure-property relationships through experimental and analytical studies of fatigue performance
    Asherloo, Mohammadreza
    Ramadurai, Madhavan Sampath
    Heim, Mike
    Nelson, Dave
    Paliwal, Muktesh
    Ghamarian, Iman
    Rollett, Anthony D.
    Mostafaei, Amir
    ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2024, 95
  • [34] Process Design of Laser Powder Bed Fusion of Stainless Steel Using a Gaussian Process-Based Machine Learning Model
    Meng, Lingbin
    Zhang, Jing
    JOM, 2020, 72 (01) : 420 - 428
  • [35] Multi-source information fusion for enhanced in-process quality monitoring of laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing
    Shen, Tao
    Li, Bo
    Zhang, Jianrui
    Xuan, Fuzhen
    ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2024, 96
  • [36] Fuzzy process optimization of laser powder bed fusion of 316L stainless steel
    Ponticelli, Gennaro Salvatore
    Venettacci, Simone
    Giannini, Oliviero
    Guarino, Stefano
    Horn, Matthias
    PROGRESS IN ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2023, 8 (03) : 437 - 458
  • [37] Numerical studies of melt pool and gas bubble dynamics in laser powder bed fusion process
    Li, Erlei
    Zhou, Zongyan
    Wang, Lin
    Zou, Ruiping
    Yu, Aibing
    ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2022, 56
  • [38] Laser powder bed fusion process optimization of CoCrMo alloy assisted by machine-learning
    Li, Haoqing
    Song, Bao
    Wang, Yizhen
    Zhang, Jingrui
    Zhao, Weihong
    Fang, Xiaoying
    JOURNAL OF MATERIALS RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY-JMR&T, 2024, 33 : 3901 - 3910
  • [39] Multi-layer thermo-fluid modeling of powder bed fusion (PBF) process
    Fotovvati, Behzad
    Chou, Kevin
    JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING PROCESSES, 2022, 83 : 203 - 211
  • [40] Analytical prediction of keyhole porosity in laser powder bed fusion
    Wang, Wenjia
    Ning, Jinqiang
    Liang, Steven Y.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 119 (11-12): : 6995 - 7002