Porosity management and control in powder bed fusion process through process-quality interactions

被引:32
|
作者
Xiao, Xinyi [1 ]
Roh, Byeong-Min [2 ]
Hamilton, Carter [1 ]
机构
[1] Miami Univ, Mech & Mfg Engn Dept, Oxford, OH USA
[2] Penn State Univ, Dept Mech Engn, State Coll, PA USA
关键词
Quantitative Model; Multi-dimensional Modeling; Porosity; Printable Zone; INCONEL; 718; PARAMETERS; MODEL; PREDICTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.cirpj.2022.04.005
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Laser Powder bed fusion (L-PBF) has gained much attention for its ability to manufacture high-precision and high-complexity metal components for the aircraft and automobile industries. However, to a certain degree, the print quality (shape, GD&T, mechanical property) is difficult to predict and control due to the multivariant processability. Recent research predominantly focuses on building a semantic/qualitative process relationship from the single/a few process parameters on the ultimate print qualities, such as thermal distortion failure/defect probabilities. However, such semantic/qualitative process relationships cannot reflect specific governing effects from process variables and provide an optimal selection of the parameters to ensure the build quality. Therefore, there is a strong need to develop a quantitative model within a process network and achieve a constant quality level by controlling the process parameter set. To address the aforementioned challenges, this research focuses on developing a multi-dimensional process-quality interaction model to predict and control the porosity of Titanium 6Al-4V in L-PBF. The process network is first derived from existing literature composing the potential, influential process parameters that can deviate the porosity level, such as laser power and scanning speed. Then the quantitative model is built based on a multi-dimensional quantitative modeling technique from a collection of experimental data. The multi-dimensional modeling provides an architecture that replaces the artificial neural network (ANN) or regression model to depict the mathematical relationship. The established quantitative process models analyze the intercorrelated effects from process parameters to the porosity. The printable zone can also be derived from such a quantitative model and visualized through a multi-dimension variable-control response graph to optimize the selection of process parameters. This would result in a comprehensive understanding of selecting the process parameters according to the desired porosity level and pave the path to fully control the metal L-PBF print qualities by adjusting the process variables. The experimental data also validate the proposed quantitative model to demonstrate its effectiveness and correctness.
引用
收藏
页码:120 / 128
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Predictive simulation of process windows for powder bed fusion additive manufacturing: Influence of the powder size distribution
    Rausch, Alexander M.
    Markl, Matthias
    Korner, Carolin
    COMPUTERS & MATHEMATICS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2019, 78 (07) : 2351 - 2359
  • [22] Linear Active Disturbance Rejection Control for a Laser Powder Bed Fusion Additive Manufacturing Process
    Hussain, S. Zahid
    Kausar, Zareena
    Koreshi, Zafar Ullah
    Shah, Muhammad Faizan
    Abdullah, Ahmd
    Farooq, Muhammad Umer
    ELECTRONICS, 2023, 12 (02)
  • [23] Development of an empirical process model for adjusted porosity in laser-based powder bed fusion of Ti-6Al-4V
    Emminghaus, Nicole
    Paul, Johanna
    Hoff, Christian
    Hermsdorf, Jorg
    Kaierle, Stefan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 118 (3-4): : 1239 - 1254
  • [24] Gaussian process classification of melt pool motion for laser powder bed fusion process monitoring
    Wang, Qisheng
    Lin, Xin
    Duan, Xianyin
    Yan, Ruqiang
    Fuh, Jerry Ying Hsi
    Zhu, Kunpeng
    MECHANICAL SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2023, 198
  • [25] Gaussian-process based modeling and optimal control of melt-pool geometry in laser powder bed fusion
    Ren, Yong
    Wang, Qian
    JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT MANUFACTURING, 2022, 33 (08) : 2239 - 2256
  • [26] A universal predictor-based machine learning model for optimal process maps in laser powder bed fusion process
    Gu, Zhaochen
    Sharma, Shashank
    Riley, Daniel A.
    Pantawane, Mangesh, V
    Joshi, Sameehan S.
    Fu, Song
    Dahotre, Narendra B.
    JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT MANUFACTURING, 2023, 34 (08) : 3341 - 3363
  • [27] Novel diagonal scanning strategy for the laser powder bed fusion process
    Ruei-Yu Huang
    Meng-Hao Lin
    Ruei-Shian Lai
    Chung-Wei Cheng
    Mi-Ching Tsai
    An-Chen Lee
    The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2022, 121 : 7949 - 7961
  • [28] Single track scanning experiment in laser powder bed fusion process
    Shrestha, Subin
    Chou, Kevin
    46TH SME NORTH AMERICAN MANUFACTURING RESEARCH CONFERENCE, NAMRC 46, 2018, 26 : 857 - 864
  • [29] An Empirical Approach for the Development of Process Parameters for Laser Powder Bed Fusion
    Pfaff, Aron
    Jacklein, Martin
    Schlager, Max
    Harwick, Wilfried
    Hoschke, Klaus
    Balle, Frank
    MATERIALS, 2020, 13 (23) : 1 - 20
  • [30] Effect of powder bed preheating on the crack formation and microstructure in ceramic matrix composites fabricated by laser powder-bed fusion process
    Maurya, H. S.
    Kosiba, K.
    Juhani, K.
    Sergejev, F.
    Prashanth, K. G.
    ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2022, 58