Risk factors for bad splits during sagittal split ramus osteotomy: a retrospective study of 964 cases

被引:8
作者
Jiang, N. [1 ]
Wang, M. [1 ]
Bi, R. [1 ]
Wu, G. [2 ]
Zhu, S. [1 ]
Liu, Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp Stomatol, Natl Clin Res Ctr Oral Dis, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg,State Key Lab Oral, Chengdu 610041, Peoples R China
[2] Jilin Univ, Hosp Stomatol, Dept Plast & Aesthet Surg, Changchun 130000, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Bad split; Risk factor; Orthognathic surgery; Mandibular fracture; Intraoperative complications; MANDIBULAR ANATOMY; FRACTURE LINE; 3RD MOLARS; COMPLICATIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.08.107
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
To identify the potential risk factors for bad splits, we calculated the incidence of bad splits from 484 patients with 964 cases of sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) and investigated the association between the occurrence of bad splits and risk factors such as gender, patients' age, class of occlusion, unimaxillary or bimaxillary surgery, presence of the lower third molar, thickness of the ascending ramus, and the distance from the mandibular canal to the buccal cortical bone. The results showed that 40 sides (4.149%) with bad splits occurred in 36 patients (7.438%). The mean (SD) gap width from the canal to the buccal cortex for the bad split group, at 4.02 (1.20) mm, was narrower (p = 0.003; OR = 0.689; 95% CI = 0.538 to 0.882) than the normal split group 4.80 (1.72) mm. On the contrary, no statistical significance (p > 0.05) was detected between the patients with bad splits and those with normal splits for the other factors. In conclusion, SSRO patients with narrower distances from the mandibular canal to the buccal cortex were more prone to bad splits. More attention should be paid to patients with this risk factor during future surgeries. (c) 2020 The British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:678 / 682
页数:5
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Relationship Between Mandibular Anatomy and the Occurrence of a Bad Split Upon Sagittal Split Osteotomy [J].
Aarabi, Mohammadali ;
Tabrizi, Reza ;
Hekmat, Mina ;
Shahidi, Shoaleh ;
Puzesh, Ayatollah .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2014, 72 (12) :2508-2513
[2]   Location of the mandibular lingula: Comparison of skeletal Class I and Class III patients in relation to ramus osteotomy using cone-beam computed tomography [J].
Akcay, H. ;
Kalabalik, F. ;
Tatar, B. ;
Ulu, M. .
JOURNAL OF STOMATOLOGY ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2019, 120 (06) :504-508
[3]  
Balaji S M, 2019, Ann Maxillofac Surg, V9, P228, DOI 10.4103/ams.ams_235_19
[4]   The Modifications of the Sagittal Ramus Split Osteotomy: A Literature Review [J].
Bockmann, Roland ;
Meyns, Joeri ;
Dik, Eric ;
Kessler, Peter .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2014, 2 (12)
[5]  
Bonanthaya Krishnamurthy, 2013, Indian J Plast Surg, V46, P183, DOI 10.4103/0970-0358.118592
[6]   Stabilisation of sagittal split advancement osteotomies with miniplates: a prospective multicentre study with two-year follow-up - Part III - Condylar remodelling and resorption [J].
Borstlap, WA ;
Stoelinga, PJW ;
Hoppenreijs, TJM ;
van't Hof, MA .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2004, 33 (07) :649-655
[7]   Simultaneous Removal of Third Molars During a Sagittal Split Does Not Increase the Incidence of Bad Splits in Patients Aged 30 Years or Older [J].
Camargo, Igor Batista ;
Van Sickels, Joseph E. ;
Curtis, William J. .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2015, 73 (07) :1350-1359
[8]   Risk factors and prevention of bad splits during sagittal split osteotomy [J].
Chrcanovic B.R. ;
Freire-Maia B. .
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2012, 16 (1) :19-27
[9]   How does bone thickness affect the split pattern of sagittal ramus osteotomy? [J].
Cunha, G. ;
Oliveira, M. R. ;
Salmen, F. S. ;
Gabrielli, M. F. R. ;
Gabrielli, M. A. C. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2020, 49 (02) :218-223
[10]  
EPKER BN, 1977, J ORAL SURG, V35, P157