Research Guidelines for Higher Education and Disability

被引:0
作者
Madaus, Joseph W. [1 ,2 ]
Dukes, Lyman L., III [3 ]
Lalor, Adam R. [4 ]
Aquino, Katherine [5 ]
Faggella-Luby, Michael [6 ,7 ]
Newmann, Lynn A. [8 ]
Papay, Clare [9 ]
Petcu, Stefania [10 ]
Scott, Sally [11 ]
Wessel, Roger D. [12 ]
机构
[1] Univ Connecticut, Collaborat Postsecondary Educ & Disabil, Storrs, CT 06269 USA
[2] Univ Connecticut, Dept Educ Psychol, Neag Sch Educ, Storrs, CT 06269 USA
[3] Univ S Florida, Special Educ, Coll Educ, Tampa, FL 33620 USA
[4] Landmark Coll, Inst Res & Training, Putney, VT USA
[5] St Johns Univ, Dept Adm & Instruct Leadership, Sch Educ, Jamaica, NY 11439 USA
[6] Texas Christian Univ, Special Educ, Ft Worth, TX 76129 USA
[7] Texas Christian Univ, Alice Nee Ley Special Educ Res & Serv Inst, Ft Worth, TX 76129 USA
[8] SRI Int, Ctr Learning & Dev, 333 Ravenswood Ave, Menlo Pk, CA 94025 USA
[9] Univ Massachusetts, Boston, MA 02125 USA
[10] Univ New Mexico, Ctr Collaborat Res & Community Engagement, Coll Educ & Human Sci, Albuquerque, NM 87131 USA
[11] Assoc Higher Educ & Disabil, Res, Washington, DC USA
[12] Ball State Univ, Higher Educ, Muncie, IN 47306 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF POSTSECONDARY EDUCATION AND DISABILITY | 2020年 / 33卷 / 04期
关键词
postsecondary education; students with disabilities; research guidelines; SINGLE-SUBJECT RESEARCH; RESEARCH DESIGNS; STUDENTS; QUALITY; CALL;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G76 [特殊教育];
学科分类号
040109 ;
摘要
The body of research in the field of postsecondary education and disability is wide ranging and continues to evolve. Specifically, the literature corpus includes contributions from a range of professions and a considerable number of journals. This breadth of diversity in perspective presents significant advantages; however, it also presents challenges such as how study data are collected and communicated. The article authors represent a range of study disciplines, possess an array of methodological experience, and are affiliated with numerous professional organizations. We present a series of research guidelines for studies focused on postsecondary education and disability, particularly related to describing the sample members and study locations in a clear, consistent manner. The most common currently employed research methodologies are summarized, and suggestions proffered with regard to key study elements to report. The guidelines are not intended to be proscriptive or restrictive, but instead highlight the importance of methodological consistency as the field collectively promotes improved adult outcomes for individuals with disabilities.
引用
收藏
页码:319 / 338
页数:20
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
American Psychological Association, 2015, Definitions related to sexual orientation and gender diversity in APA documents
[2]  
American Psychological Association, 2020, REHABIL NURS, V7th, DOI 10.1037/0000165-000
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2007, EDUC TRAIN AUTISM DE, V45, P187
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Scientific Research in Education, DOI DOI 10.17226/10236
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2015, INVESTIGATING SOCIAL
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2018, SAGE HDB QUALITATIVE
[7]  
Baryman A., 2006, Qualitative Research, V6, P97, DOI [DOI 10.1177/1468794106058877, 10.1177/1468794106058877]
[8]  
Blatter J.K., 2012, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods, P68
[9]  
Borg W.R., 1989, Educational Research: An Introduction
[10]   Qualitative studies in special education [J].
Brantlinger, E ;
Jimenez, R ;
Klingner, J ;
Pugach, M ;
Richardson, V .
EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN, 2005, 71 (02) :195-207