Patients' satisfaction with facial prostheses

被引:29
|
作者
Wondergem, Marloes [1 ,2 ]
Lieben, George [1 ]
Bouman, Shirley [1 ]
van den Brekel, Michiel W. M. [1 ,3 ]
Lohuis, Peter J. F. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Head & Neck Surg, POB 90203, NL-1006 BE Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, POB 30001, NL-9700 RB Groningen, Netherlands
[3] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, POB 22660, NL-1100 DD Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
facial prosthesis; patients' satisfaction; osseointegrated implants; adhesive; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; SOFT-TISSUE EVALUATION; SURVIVAL RATES; EXTRAORAL IMPLANTS; NASAL PROSTHESIS; RECONSTRUCTION; REHABILITATION; OSSEOINTEGRATION; DEFECTS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.bjoms.2015.09.011
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
We assessed the "impact on wellbeing" and "satisfaction" of patients who had a facial prosthesis (of the ear, nose, or orbit) fitted in The Netherlands Cancer Institute. Patients had either an adhesive-retained or an implant-retained facial prosthesis between 1951 and 2011. We did a cross-sectional survey of 104 patients, then gave a questionnaire to the final study group of 71 (68%), a year or more later. All were satisfied with their prostheses (visual analogue scale (VAS): mean (SD) 8.1(1.5). The implant-retained group were the most satisfied (p = 0.022), and the adhesive-retained group felt more self-conscious (p = 0.013). Three-quarters of all patients said that the prosthesis was not painful and there were no problems with the way it functioned. A well-designed facial prosthesis has obvious benefits, but there were no appreciable differences between the two groups. Each patient must make a careful decision about which type of prosthesis to choose, taking into account the quality of their remaining tissue, the site of the defect, and their general health. (C) 2015 The British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:394 / 399
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Quality of life assessment of patients utilizing orbital implant-supported prostheses
    de Oliveira, Fernando Moreno
    Salazar-Gamarra, Rodrigo
    Ohman, David
    Nannmark, Ulf
    Pecorari, Vanessa
    Dib, Luciano Lauria
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2018, 20 (04) : 438 - 443
  • [2] Extraoral Implants for Anchoring Facial Prostheses: Evaluation of Success and Survival Rates in Three Anatomical Regions
    dos Reis, Heitor Batista
    Piras de Oliveira, Joaquim Augusto
    Pecorari, Vanessa Arias
    Raoufi, Shiva
    Abrahao, Marcio
    Dib, Luciano Lauria
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2017, 32 (02) : 385 - 391
  • [3] Assessment of health-related quality of life in Turkish patients with facial prostheses
    Atay, Arzu
    Peker, Kadriye
    Gunay, Yumushan
    Ebrinc, Servet
    Karayazgan, Banu
    Uysal, Omer
    HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2013, 11
  • [4] Assessment of treatment outcomes for facial prostheses in patients with craniofacial defects: A pilot retrospective study
    Brandao, Thais Bianca
    Vechiato Filho, Aljomar Jose
    de Souza Batista, Victor Eduardo
    Prado Ribeiro, Ana Carolina
    Nary Filho, Hugo
    Chilvarquer, Israel
    Nunn, Martha E.
    Santos-Silva, Alan Roger
    Ricardo Barao, Valentim Adelino
    Wee, Alvin G.
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2017, 118 (02) : 235 - 241
  • [5] A Contemporary Review of the Role of Facial Prostheses in Complex Facial Reconstruction
    Slijepcevic, Allison A.
    Afshari, Azadeh
    Vitale, Ann E.
    Couch, Steven M.
    Jeanpierre, Latoya M.
    Chi, John J.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2023, 151 (02) : 288E - 298E
  • [6] Osseointegrated Implants for Orbito-Facial Prostheses: Common Complications and Solutions
    Sendul, Selam Yekta
    Yildiz, Aysegul Mavi
    Yildiz, Ali Atakhan
    Akbas, Emine
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2021, 32 (05) : 1770 - 1774
  • [7] Craniofacial prostheses for facial defects
    Federspil, P. A.
    HNO, 2010, 58 (06) : 621 - 631
  • [8] Recommendations for implant-retained nasal prostheses after ablative tumor surgery: Minimal surgical aftercare, high implant survival, and satisfied patients
    Korfage, Anke
    Raghoebar, Gerry M.
    Noorda, Willem D.
    Plaat, Boudewijn E.
    Vissink, Arjan
    Visser, Anita
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2016, 38 : E619 - E624
  • [9] Assessment of health-related quality of life in Turkish patients with facial prostheses
    Arzu Atay
    Kadriye Peker
    Yumushan Günay
    Servet Ebrinç
    Banu Karayazgan
    Ömer Uysal
    Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 11
  • [10] Assessment of Satisfaction Level of Edentulous Patients Rehabilitated with Implant-Supported Prostheses
    de Souza, Fernando Isquierdo
    Costa, Alessandro de Souza
    Pereira, Rodrigo dos Santos
    dos Santos, Paulo Henrique
    de Brito, Rui Barbosa, Jr.
    Rocha, Eduardo Passos
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2016, 31 (04) : 884 - 890