Radiation Awareness for Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair in the Hybrid Operating Room. An Instant Patient Risk Chart for Daily Practice

被引:23
作者
de Ruiter, Quirina M. [1 ]
Gijsberts, Crystel M. [2 ,3 ]
Hazenberg, Constantijn E. [1 ]
Moll, Frans L. [1 ]
van Herwaarden, Joost A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Vasc Surg, Heidelberglaan 100,Postbus 85500, NL-3508 GA Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] ICIN Netherlands Heart Inst, Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Lab Expt Cardiol, Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
abdominal aortic aneurysm; air kerma; C-arm image intensifier; digital subtraction angiography; dose area product; dose reduction; endovascular aneurysm repair; fluoroscopy; imaging technology; radiation dose; risk assessment; X-ray; IMAGING TECHNOLOGY; DOSE-REDUCTION; EXPOSURE; FUSION; FLUOROSCOPY; ANGIOGRAPHY; ANGULATION; GUIDANCE; STAFF;
D O I
10.1177/1526602817697188
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: To determine which patient and C-arm characteristics are the strongest predictors of intraoperative patient radiation dose rates (DRs) during endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) procedures and create a patient risk chart. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed of 74 EVAR procedures, including 16,889 X-ray runs using fixed C-arm imaging equipment. Four multivariate log-linear mixed models (with patient as a random effect) were constructed. Mean air kerma DR (DRAK, mGy/s) and the mean dose area product DR (DRDAP, mGycm(2)/s) were the outcome variables utilized for fluoroscopy as differentiated from digital subtraction angiography (DSA). These models were used to predict the maximum radiation duration allowed before a 2-Gy skin threshold (for DRAK) or a 500-Gycm(2) threshold (for DRDAP) was reached. Results: The strongest predictor of DRAK and DRDAP for fluoroscopy imaging was the radiation protocol, with an increase of 200% when changing from low to medium and 410% from low to normal. The strongest predictors of DRAK and DRDAP for DSA were C-arm angulation, with an increase of 47% per 30 degrees of angulation, and body mass index (BMI), with an increase of 58% for every 5-point increase in BMI. Based on these models, a patient with a BMI of 30 kg/m(2), combined with 45 degrees of rotation and a field size of 800 cm(2) in the medium fluoroscopy protocol has a predicted DRAK of 0.39 mGy/s (or 85.5 minutes until the 2-Gy skin threshold is reached). While using comparable settings but switching the acquisition to a DSA with a 2 frames per second protocol, the predicted DRAK will be 6.6 mGy/s (or 5.0 minutes until the 2-Gy threshold is reached). Conclusion: X-ray radiation DRs are constantly fluctuating during and between patients based on BMI, the protocols, C-arm position, and the image acquisitions that are used. An instant patient risk chart visualizes these radiation dose fluctuations and provides an overview of the expected duration of X-ray radiation, which can be used to predict when follow-up dose thresholds are reached during abdominal endovascular procedures.
引用
收藏
页码:425 / 434
页数:10
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Relationship of Beam Angulation and Radiation Exposure in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory [J].
Agarwal, Shikhar ;
Parashar, Akhil ;
Bajaj, Navkaranbir Singh ;
Khan, Imran ;
Ahmad, Imran ;
Heupler, Fredrick A., Jr. ;
Bunte, Matthew ;
Modi, Dhruv K. ;
Tuzcu, E. Murat ;
Kapadia, Samir R. .
JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2014, 7 (05) :558-566
[2]   Using 7.5 frames per second reduces radiation exposure in lower extremity peripheral vascular interventions [J].
Akkus, Nuri I. ;
Mina, George S. ;
Abdulbaki, Abdulrahman ;
Shafiei, Fereidoon ;
Tandon, Neeraj .
VASCULAR, 2015, 23 (03) :240-244
[3]   Editor's Choice - Angulation of the C-Arm During Complex Endovascular Aortic Procedures Increases Radiation Exposure to the Head [J].
Albayati, M. A. ;
Kelly, S. ;
Gallagher, D. ;
Dourado, R. ;
Patel, A. S. ;
Saha, P. ;
Bajwa, A. ;
El-Sayed, T. ;
Salter, R. ;
Gkoutzious, P. ;
Carrell, T. ;
Abisi, S. ;
Modarai, B. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2015, 49 (04) :396-402
[4]   Radiation exposure to eye lens and operator hands during endovascular procedures in hybrid operating rooms [J].
Attigah, Nicolas ;
Oikonomou, Kyriakos ;
Hinz, Ulf ;
Knoch, Thomas ;
Demirel, Serdar ;
Verhoeven, Eric ;
Boeckler, Dittmar .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2016, 63 (01) :198-203
[5]   Fluoroscopic Frame Rates: Not Only Dose [J].
Baiter, Stephen .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2014, 203 (03) :W234-W236
[6]   Management of Patient and Staff Radiation Dose in Interventional Radiology: Current Concepts [J].
Bartal, Gabriel ;
Vano, Eliseo ;
Paulo, Graciano ;
Miller, Donald L. .
CARDIOVASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2014, 37 (02) :289-298
[7]   The Effect of Realtime Monitoring on Dose Exposure to Staff Within an Interventional Radiology Setting [J].
Baumann, Frederic ;
Katzen, Barry T. ;
Carelsen, Bart ;
Diehm, Nicolas ;
Benenati, James F. ;
Pena, Constantino S. .
CARDIOVASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2015, 38 (05) :1105-1111
[8]   AlluraClarity Radiation Dose-Reduction Technology in the Hybrid Operating Room During Endovascular Aneurysm Repair [J].
de Ruiter, Quirina M. B. ;
Moll, Frans L. ;
Gijsberts, Crystel M. ;
van Herwaarden, Joost A. .
JOURNAL OF ENDOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2016, 23 (01) :130-138
[9]   The effects of combining fusion imaging, low-frequency pulsed fluoroscopy, and low-concentration contrast agent during endovascular aneurysm repair [J].
Dias, Nuno V. ;
Billberg, Helen ;
Sonesson, Bjorn ;
Tornqvist, Per ;
Resch, Tim ;
Kristmundsson, Thorarinn .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2016, 63 (05) :1147-1155
[10]   Defining the radiation "scatter cloud" in the interventional suite [J].
Haqqani, Omar P. ;
Agarwal, Prakhar K. ;
Halin, Neil M. ;
Iafrati, Mark D. .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2013, 58 (05) :1339-1345