Predictive power of the ESUR scoring system for prostate cancer diagnosis verified with targeted MR-guided in-bore biopsy

被引:35
|
作者
Schimmoeller, L. [1 ]
Quentin, M. [1 ]
Arsov, C. [2 ]
Hiester, A. [2 ]
Kroepil, P. [1 ]
Rabenalt, R. [2 ]
Albers, P. [2 ]
Antoch, G. [1 ]
Blondin, D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Dusseldorf, Fac Med, Dept Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
[2] Univ Dusseldorf, Fac Med, Dept Urol, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
关键词
Prostate cancer; Prostate MRI; PI-RADS; ESUR scoring system; MRI-guided biopsy; MULTIPARAMETRIC MRI; LOCALIZATION; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.08.006
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: This study evaluates the diagnostic value of the ESUR scoring system (PI-RADS) regarding prostate cancer detection using MR-guided in-bore biopsies (IB-GB) as the reference standard. Methods: 566 lesions in 235 consecutive patients (65.7 +/- 7.9 years, PSA 9.9 +/- 8.5 ng/m1) with a multiparametric (mp)-MRI (T2WI, DWI, DCE) of the prostate at 3 T were scored using the PI-RADS scoring system. PI-RADS single (PSsingle), summed (PSsum), and overall (PSoverall) scores were determined. All lesions were histologically verified by IB-GB. Results: Lesions with a PSsum below 9 contained no prostate cancer (PCa) with Gleason score (GS) > 4 + 3 = 7. A PS. of 13-15 (PSoverall V) resulted in 87.8% (n=108) in PCa and in 42.3% (n=52) in GS > 4 + 3 = 7. Transition zone (TZ) lesions with a PS. of 13-15 (PSoveraii V) resulted in 76.3% (n=36) in PCa and in 26.3% (n=10) in GS >= 4 + 3 = 7, whereas for peripheral zone (PZ) lesions cancer detection rate at this score was 92.9% (n=79) and 49.4% (n=42) for GS >= 4 + 3 = 7. Using a threshold of PSsum >= 10, sensitivity was 86.0%, and negative predictive value (NPV) was 86.2%. For higher grade PCa sensitivity was 98.6%, and NPV was 99.5%. Conclusion: A PSsum below 9 excluded a higher grade PCa, whereas lesions with a PSsum >= 13 (PSoverall V) represented in 88% PCa, and in 42% higher grade PCa. The PSsum or PSoverall demonstrated a better diagnostic value for PZ lesions with higher detection rates for higher grade PCa compared to TZ lesions. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2103 / 2108
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Areas Suspicious for Prostate Cancer: MR-guided Biopsy in Patients with at Least One Transrectal US-guided Biopsy with a Negative Finding-Multiparametric MR Imaging for Detection and Biopsy Planning
    Franiel, Tobias
    Stephan, Carsten
    Erbersdobler, Andreas
    Dietz, Ekkehart
    Maxeiner, Andreas
    Hell, Nina
    Huppertz, Alexander
    Miller, Kurt
    Strecker, Ralph
    Hamm, Bernd
    RADIOLOGY, 2011, 259 (01) : 162 - 172
  • [42] The role of the size and number of index lesion in the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer in patients with PI-RADS 4 lesions who underwent in-bore MRI-guided prostate biopsy
    Mert Kilic
    Serdar Madendere
    Metin Vural
    Ersin Koseoglu
    Mevlana Derya Balbay
    Tarik Esen
    World Journal of Urology, 2023, 41 : 449 - 454
  • [43] The role of the size and number of index lesion in the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer in patients with PI-RADS 4 lesions who underwent in-bore MRI-guided prostate biopsy
    Kilic, Mert
    Madendere, Serdar
    Vural, Metin
    Koseoglu, Ersin
    Balbay, Mevlana Derya
    Esen, Tarik
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, 41 (02) : 449 - 454
  • [44] 3.0-T MR-guided transgluteal in-bore-targeted prostate biopsy under local anesthesia in patients without rectal access: a single-institute experience and review of literature
    Kaustav Bera
    Nikhil Ramaiya
    Raj Mohan Paspulati
    Dean Nakamoto
    Sree Harsha Tirumani
    Abdominal Radiology, 2024, 49 : 1223 - 1230
  • [45] 3.0-T MR-guided transgluteal in-bore-targeted prostate biopsy under local anesthesia in patients without rectal access: a single-institute experience and review of literature
    Bera, Kaustav
    Ramaiya, Nikhil
    Paspulati, Raj Mohan
    Nakamoto, Dean
    Tirumani, Sree Harsha
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2024, 49 (04) : 1223 - 1230
  • [46] Prospective Study of Diagnostic Accuracy Comparing Prostate Cancer Detection by Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Biopsy Versus Magnetic Resonance (MR) Imaging with Subsequent MR-guided Biopsy in Men Without Previous Prostate Biopsies
    Pokorny, Morgan R.
    De Rooij, Maarten
    Duncan, Earl
    Schroeder, Fritz H.
    Parkinson, Robert
    Barentsz, Jelle O.
    Thompson, Leslie C.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2014, 66 (01) : 22 - 29
  • [47] Retrospective comparison of direct in-bore magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided biopsy and fusion-guided biopsy in patients with MRI lesions which are likely or highly likely to be clinically significant prostate cancer
    Venderink, Wulphert
    van der Leest, Marloes
    van Luijtelaar, Annemarijke
    van de Ven, Wendy J. M.
    Futterer, Jurgen J.
    Sedelaar, J. P. Michiel
    Huisman, Henkjan J.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 35 (12) : 1849 - 1855
  • [48] Retrospective comparison of direct in-bore magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided biopsy and fusion-guided biopsy in patients with MRI lesions which are likely or highly likely to be clinically significant prostate cancer
    Wulphert Venderink
    Marloes van der Leest
    Annemarijke van Luijtelaar
    Wendy J. M. van de Ven
    Jurgen J. Fütterer
    J. P. Michiel Sedelaar
    Henkjan J. Huisman
    World Journal of Urology, 2017, 35 : 1849 - 1855
  • [49] A Nomogram Based on a TRUS Five-Grade Scoring System for the Prediction of Prostate Cancer and High Grade Prostate Cancer at Initial TRUS-Guided Biopsy
    Xie, Shao Wei
    Wang, Yan Qing
    Dong, Bai Jun
    Xia, Jian Guo
    Li, Hong Li
    Zhang, Shi Jun
    Li, Feng Hua
    Xue, Wei
    JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2018, 9 (23): : 4382 - 4390
  • [50] A Prospective Comparison of MRI-Guided Targeted Biopsy with 12-Core Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Systematic Biopsy in the Diagnosis of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: An Indian Experience
    Netaji, Arjunlokesh
    Kubihal, Vijay
    Sharma, Raju
    Seth, Amlesh
    Kaushal, Seema
    Das, Chandan J.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND IMAGING, 2024,