Predictive power of the ESUR scoring system for prostate cancer diagnosis verified with targeted MR-guided in-bore biopsy

被引:35
|
作者
Schimmoeller, L. [1 ]
Quentin, M. [1 ]
Arsov, C. [2 ]
Hiester, A. [2 ]
Kroepil, P. [1 ]
Rabenalt, R. [2 ]
Albers, P. [2 ]
Antoch, G. [1 ]
Blondin, D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Dusseldorf, Fac Med, Dept Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
[2] Univ Dusseldorf, Fac Med, Dept Urol, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
关键词
Prostate cancer; Prostate MRI; PI-RADS; ESUR scoring system; MRI-guided biopsy; MULTIPARAMETRIC MRI; LOCALIZATION; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.08.006
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: This study evaluates the diagnostic value of the ESUR scoring system (PI-RADS) regarding prostate cancer detection using MR-guided in-bore biopsies (IB-GB) as the reference standard. Methods: 566 lesions in 235 consecutive patients (65.7 +/- 7.9 years, PSA 9.9 +/- 8.5 ng/m1) with a multiparametric (mp)-MRI (T2WI, DWI, DCE) of the prostate at 3 T were scored using the PI-RADS scoring system. PI-RADS single (PSsingle), summed (PSsum), and overall (PSoverall) scores were determined. All lesions were histologically verified by IB-GB. Results: Lesions with a PSsum below 9 contained no prostate cancer (PCa) with Gleason score (GS) > 4 + 3 = 7. A PS. of 13-15 (PSoverall V) resulted in 87.8% (n=108) in PCa and in 42.3% (n=52) in GS > 4 + 3 = 7. Transition zone (TZ) lesions with a PS. of 13-15 (PSoveraii V) resulted in 76.3% (n=36) in PCa and in 26.3% (n=10) in GS >= 4 + 3 = 7, whereas for peripheral zone (PZ) lesions cancer detection rate at this score was 92.9% (n=79) and 49.4% (n=42) for GS >= 4 + 3 = 7. Using a threshold of PSsum >= 10, sensitivity was 86.0%, and negative predictive value (NPV) was 86.2%. For higher grade PCa sensitivity was 98.6%, and NPV was 99.5%. Conclusion: A PSsum below 9 excluded a higher grade PCa, whereas lesions with a PSsum >= 13 (PSoverall V) represented in 88% PCa, and in 42% higher grade PCa. The PSsum or PSoverall demonstrated a better diagnostic value for PZ lesions with higher detection rates for higher grade PCa compared to TZ lesions. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2103 / 2108
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The use of targeted MR-guided prostate biopsy reduces the risk of Gleason upgrading on radical prostatectomy
    Christian Arsov
    Nikolaus Becker
    Robert Rabenalt
    Andreas Hiester
    Michael Quentin
    Frederic Dietzel
    Gerald Antoch
    Helmut E. Gabbert
    Peter Albers
    Lars Schimmöller
    Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, 2015, 141 : 2061 - 2068
  • [32] The use of targeted MR-guided prostate biopsy reduces the risk of Gleason upgrading on radical prostatectomy
    Arsov, Christian
    Becker, Nikolaus
    Rabenalt, Robert
    Hiester, Andreas
    Quentin, Michael
    Dietzel, Frederic
    Antoch, Gerald
    Gabbert, Helmut E.
    Albers, Peter
    Schimmoeller, Lars
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 141 (11) : 2061 - 2068
  • [33] Interreader Agreement of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 Using an In-Bore MRI-Guided Prostate Biopsy Cohort: A Single Institution's Initial Experience
    Glazer, Daniel I.
    Mayo-Smith, William W.
    Sainani, Nisha I.
    Sadow, Cheryl A.
    Vangel, Mark G.
    Tempany, Clare M.
    Dunne, Ruth M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2017, 209 (03) : W145 - W151
  • [34] Cost-effectiveness of Magnetic Resonance (MR) Imaging and MR-guided Targeted Biopsy Versus Systematic Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Biopsy in Diagnosing Prostate Cancer: A Modelling Study from a Health Care Perspective
    de Rooij, Maarten
    Crienen, Simone
    Witjes, J. Alfred
    Barentsz, Jelle O.
    Rovers, Maroeska M.
    Grutters, Janneke P. C.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2014, 66 (03) : 430 - 436
  • [35] Prostate Cancer Detection Rate of Manually Operated and Robot-assisted In-bore Magnetic Resonance Imaging Targeted Biopsy
    Sandahl, Mads
    Sandahl, Kristian Juul
    Marinovskij, Edvard
    Nielsen, Tomas Frahm
    Sorensen, Karina Dalsgaard
    Borre, Michael
    Ulhoi, Benedicte Parm
    Pedersen, Bodil Ginnerup
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY OPEN SCIENCE, 2022, 41 : 88 - 94
  • [36] Comparison of MR/Ultrasound Fusion-Guided Biopsy With Ultrasound-Guided Biopsy for the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer
    Siddiqui, M. Minhaj
    Rais-Bahrami, Soroush
    Turkbey, Baris
    George, Arvin K.
    Rothwax, Jason
    Shakir, Nabeel
    Okoro, Chinonyerem
    Raskolnikov, Dima
    Parnes, Howard L.
    Linehan, W. Marston
    Merino, Maria J.
    Simon, Richard M.
    Choyke, Peter L.
    Wood, Bradford J.
    Pinto, Peter A.
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2015, 313 (04): : 390 - 397
  • [37] Differentiation of Prostatitis and Prostate Cancer by Using Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging and MR-guided Biopsy at 3 T
    Nagel, Klaas N. A.
    Schouten, Martijn G.
    Hambrock, Thomas
    Litjens, Geert J. S.
    Hoeks, Caroline M. A.
    ten Haken, Bennie
    Barentsz, Jelle O.
    Futterer, Jurgen J.
    RADIOLOGY, 2013, 267 (01) : 164 - 172
  • [38] Prostate cancer gene 3 (PCA3) is of additional predictive value in patients with PI-RADS grade III (intermediate) lesions in the MR-guided re-biopsy setting for prostate cancer
    S. Kaufmann
    J. Bedke
    S. Gatidis
    J. Hennenlotter
    U. Kramer
    M. Notohamiprodjo
    K. Nikolaou
    A. Stenzl
    S. Kruck
    World Journal of Urology, 2016, 34 : 509 - 515
  • [39] Prostate cancer gene 3 (PCA3) is of additional predictive value in patients with PI-RADS grade III (intermediate) lesions in the MR-guided re-biopsy setting for prostate cancer
    Kaufmann, S.
    Bedke, J.
    Gatidis, S.
    Hennenlotter, J.
    Kramer, U.
    Notohamiprodjo, M.
    Nikolaou, K.
    Stenzl, A.
    Kruck, S.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 34 (04) : 509 - 515
  • [40] Impact of the Number of Cores on the Prostate Cancer Detection Rate in Men Undergoing in-Bore Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Targeted Biopsies
    Subramanian, Naveen
    Recchimuzzi, Debora Z.
    Xi, Yin
    Diaz de Leon, Alberto
    Chen, Heng
    Xie, Donglu
    Goldberg, Kenneth
    Rofsky, Neil M.
    Pedrosa, Ivan
    Costa, Daniel N.
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2021, 45 (02) : 203 - 209