The Usefulness of Diffusion MRI in Detection of Lymph Node Metastases of Colorectal Cancer

被引:1
作者
Ogawa, Masaichi [1 ]
Ichiba, Noriatsu [2 ]
Watanabe, Michiaki [1 ]
Yanaga, Katsuhiko [1 ]
机构
[1] Jikei Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Tokyo 1058461, Japan
[2] Jikei Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Tokyo 1058461, Japan
关键词
Diffusion MRI; colorectal cancer; lymphnode metastasis; POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; PROSTATE-CANCER; CT; CARCINOMA; PET; DIAGNOSIS; ACCURACY; COLON;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to assess the sensitivity and specificity of preoperative diagnosis by diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (D-MRI) for lymph node metastasis of colorectal cancer. The b-value represents the diffusion factor (measured in s/mm(2)) and the strength of the diffusion gradients. The b-value used in this study was 1,000 s/mm(2). A total of 119 patients underwent D-MRI before resection of primary colorectal cancer (52 of the rectum, 67 of the colon) at our hospital between February 2005 and April 2006. Lymph node metastases judged by D-MRI were compared with postoperative pathological results. The form of lymph node metastasis was classified either as abundant or scarce type. The predictive values for lymph-node metastasis (sensitivity and specificity) by D-MRI were calculated from the result of this classification and lymph-node size. The study was divided into two periods: before the consensus meeting in January 2006, (n= 79) (P-I), and after the adjustment of the criteria to improve the sensitivity and specificity based on the results of P-I (n= 40) (P-II). Detection of lymph node metastasis using D-MRI in P-I had sensitivity of 61%, specificity of 73%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 55%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 77%, while in P-II, these values improved to 79%, 95%, 94%, and 83%, respectively. Specificity and PPV for P-II were significantly higher than those for P-I (p< 0.05). The diameter of lymph nodes judged to be metastatic on D-MRI (P-I vs. P-II: n= 32 vs. 16) was 10.3 +/- 5.4 (3-28) vs. 9.1 +/- 3.0 (4-14) mm; 11.5 +/- 6.2 (4-28) vs. 9.2 +/- 3.1 (4-14) mm for truly positive nodes (n= 18 vs. 15), and 6 +/- 3.8 (3-14) vs. 8 mm for false-positive nodes (n= 14 vs. 1). On the other hand, lymph nodes judged negative by D-MRI (n= 47 vs. 24) was 5.9 +/- 2.4 (3-16) vs. 5.7 +/- 2.8 (2-15) mm; 5.9 +/- 2.1 (3-16) vs. 5.3 +/- 2.1 (2-8) mm for truly negative (n= 36 vs. 20), and 5.7 +/- 2.7 3-12) vs. 7.8 +/- 4.9 (4-15) mm for false negative (n= 11 vs. 4). As to the form of metastasis, all truly positive nodes were of the abundant type, and 6/11 (55%) in P-I and 1/4 (25%) in PII false-negatives were of the scarce type. In conclusion, D-MRI seems useful for preoperative detection of metastatic lymph nodes in colorectal cancer, especially if the node is hyperintense and more than 9 mm in diameter.
引用
收藏
页码:815 / 819
页数:5
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Staging of primary colorectal carcinomas with fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose whole-body PET: Correlation with histopathologic and CT findings [J].
Abdel-Nabi, H ;
Doerr, RJ ;
Lamonica, DM ;
Cronin, VR ;
Galantowicz, P ;
Carbone, GM ;
Spaulding, MB .
RADIOLOGY, 1998, 206 (03) :755-760
[2]   Metastases from non-small cell lung cancer: Mediastinal staging in the 1990s - Meta-analytic comparison of PET and CT [J].
Dwamena, BA ;
Sonnad, SS ;
Angobaldo, JO ;
Wahl, RL .
RADIOLOGY, 1999, 213 (02) :530-536
[3]   Colorectal carcinoma: radiological diagnosis and staging [J].
Elmas, N ;
Killi, RM ;
Sever, A .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2002, 42 (03) :206-223
[4]   Preoperative T and N staging of colorectal cancer: Accuracy of contrast-enhanced multi-detector row CT colonography - Initial experience [J].
Filippone, A ;
Ambrosini, R ;
Fuschi, M ;
Marinelli, T ;
Genovesi, D ;
Bonomo, L .
RADIOLOGY, 2004, 231 (01) :83-90
[5]   Positron emission tomography scanning is not superior to whole body multidetector helical computed tomography in the preoperative staging of colorectal cancer [J].
Furukawa, H. ;
Ikuma, H. ;
Seki, A. ;
Yokoe, K. ;
Yuen, S. ;
T Aramaki ;
Yamaguchi, S. .
GUT, 2006, 55 (07) :1007-1011
[6]   STAGING OF COLON-CARCINOMA USING WATER ENEMA CT [J].
GAZELLE, GS ;
GAA, JC ;
SAINI, S ;
SHELLITO, P .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1995, 19 (01) :87-91
[7]  
Ho Mai-Lan, 2008, Clin Colon Rectal Surg, V21, P178, DOI 10.1055/s-2008-1080997
[8]   Evaluation of spiral CT in staging of colon and rectum carcinoma [J].
Hundt, W ;
Braunschweig, R ;
Reiser, M .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 1999, 9 (01) :78-84
[9]  
Ichikawa T, 2004, RADIAT MED, V22, P275
[10]  
Kantorová I, 2003, J NUCL MED, V44, P1784