Assessing cognitive abilities in children with autism: practitioner evaluation of treatment validity

被引:0
作者
Aljunied, Mariam [1 ]
Frederickson, Norah L. [2 ]
机构
[1] Minist Educ, Psychol Serv Branch, Singapore, Singapore
[2] UCL, Dept Psychol, London WC1E 6BT, England
关键词
Autism; treatment validity; cognitive assessment; IQ; dynamic assessment; executive dysfunction; theory of mind; SPECTRUM DISORDERS; TASK-PERFORMANCE; FALSE BELIEF; MIND; INDIVIDUALS; DEFICITS;
D O I
10.1179/2047387714Y.0000000057
中图分类号
G76 [特殊教育];
学科分类号
040109 ;
摘要
This study investigated practitioners' perception of the treatment validity in autism of two assessments of general cognitive abilities: intellectual quotient (IQ) and dynamic assessment, and two assessments related to causal cognitive theories in autism: theory of mind and executive function. The views of 14 educational and clinical psychologists were sought through focus group methodology in relation to three aspects of treatment validity: treatment utility, cost-benefit analysis, and incremental validity. Practitioners evaluated the treatment validity of the assessment measures related to causal theories of autism more favourably than the measures of general cognitive abilities. The theory of mind battery was most positively evaluated in terms of its incremental validity, i.e. it was seen to provide 'unique' information about children with autism not readily offered by other methods.
引用
收藏
页码:231 / 241
页数:11
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]   Does central coherence relate to the cognitive performance of children with autism in dynamic assessments? [J].
Aljunied, Mariam ;
Frederickson, Norah .
AUTISM, 2013, 17 (02) :172-183
[2]   Cognitive indicators of different levels of special educational support needs in autism [J].
Aljunied, Mariam ;
Frederickson, Norah .
RESEARCH IN AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDERS, 2011, 5 (01) :368-376
[3]  
American Educational Research Association American Psychological Association & National Council on Measurement in Education, 2014, The standards for educational and psychological testing
[4]  
APA, 2013, DIAGN STAT MAN MENT
[5]   What is "theory of mind"? Concepts, cognitive processes and individual differences [J].
Apperly, Ian A. .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 65 (05) :825-839
[6]  
Baron-Cohen S., 2005, UNDERSTANDING OTHER, Vxix, P3
[7]   OUT OF SIGHT OR OUT OF MIND - ANOTHER LOOK AT DECEPTION IN AUTISM [J].
BARONCOHEN, S .
JOURNAL OF CHILD PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY, 1992, 33 (07) :1141-1155
[8]   DOES THE AUTISTIC-CHILD HAVE A THEORY OF MIND [J].
BARONCOHEN, S ;
LESLIE, AM ;
FRITH, U .
COGNITION, 1985, 21 (01) :37-46
[9]   THE AUTISTIC CHILDS THEORY OF MIND - A CASE OF SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENTAL DELAY [J].
BARONCOHEN, S .
JOURNAL OF CHILD PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY AND ALLIED DISCIPLINES, 1989, 30 (02) :285-297
[10]   Theory of Mind Training in Children with Autism: A Randomized Controlled Trial [J].
Begeer, Sander ;
Gevers, Carolien ;
Clifford, Pamela ;
Verhoeve, Manja ;
Kat, Kirstin ;
Hoddenbach, Elske ;
Boer, Frits .
JOURNAL OF AUTISM AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS, 2011, 41 (08) :997-1006