Social-Ecological Predictors of Homophobic Name-Calling Perpetration and Victimization Among Early Adolescents

被引:15
|
作者
Valido, Alberto [1 ]
Merrin, Gabriel J. [2 ]
Espelage, Dorothy L. [3 ]
Robinson, Luz E. [1 ]
Nickodem, Kyle [4 ]
Ingram, Katherine M. [1 ]
El Sheikh, America J. [5 ]
Torgal, Cagil [6 ]
Fairclough, Javari [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
[2] Texas Tech Univ, Dept Human Dev & Family Studies HDFS, Lubbock, TX 79409 USA
[3] Univ N Carolina, Educ, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
[4] Univ N Carolina, Peabody Sch Educ, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
[5] Univ Florida, Gainesville, FL USA
[6] Univ Florida, Counseling Psychol, Gainesville, FL USA
[7] Texas Tech Univ, Human Dev & Family Studies Program, Lubbock, TX 79409 USA
关键词
homophobic name-calling; early adolescence; social ecological; longitudinal analysis; PEER VICTIMIZATION; PROTECTIVE FACTORS; PSYCHOLOGICAL DISTRESS; BULLYING PERPETRATION; EMOTIONAL DISTRESS; SEXUAL ORIENTATION; COGNITIVE EMPATHY; BETWEEN-PERSON; WITHIN-PERSON; SUBSTANCE USE;
D O I
10.1177/02724316211002271
中图分类号
D669 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
Bias-based aggression at school in the form of homophobic name-calling is quite prevalent among early adolescents. Homophobic name-calling is associated with low academic performance, higher risky sexual behaviors, and substance abuse, among other adverse outcomes. This longitudinal study examined risk and protective factors across multiple domains of the social ecology (individual, peer, family, school and community) and levels of analysis (within- and between-person) associated with homophobic name-calling perpetration and victimization. Students from four middle schools in the U.S. Midwest (N = 1,655; (X) over bar age = 12.75; range = 10-16 years) were surveyed four times (Spring/Fall 2008, Spring/Fall 2009). For homophobic name-calling perpetration, significant risk factors included impulsivity, social dominance, traditional masculinity, family violence, and neighborhood violence; while empathy, peer support, school belonging, and adult support were significant protective factors. For homophobic name-calling victimization, significant risk factors included empathy (between-person), impulsivity, traditional masculinity, family violence, and neighborhood violence, while empathy (within-person), parental monitoring, peer support, school belonging, and adult support were significant protective factors.
引用
收藏
页码:1115 / 1151
页数:37
相关论文
共 33 条