NCLB and English Language Learners: Challenges and Consequences

被引:71
作者
Menken, Kate [1 ]
机构
[1] CUNY, Dept Linguist, Queens Coll, Flushing, NY 11367 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1080/00405841003626619
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This article highlights key issues surrounding the assessment and accountability mandates of No Child Left Behind (NCLB) for English language learners (ELLs). The policy requires high-stakes testing of ELLs in English-a language that these students, by definition, have not yet mastered. After offering background on current federal education legislation, this article shares findings from a word frequency analysis of actual statewide exams. This analysis reveals that even academic content tests are linguistically complex, using words likely unknown by an ELL, which clarifies why testing poses unique challenges for this student population. Analyses of recent ELL performance data on high-stakes tests are also provided, which document why these students and the schools serving them are disproportionately likely to be penalized in accordance with the law's requirements. The article concludes by challenging two of the more problematic assumptions at the core of NCLB mandates for ELLs.
引用
收藏
页码:121 / 128
页数:8
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] Abedi J., 2007, LINGUISTIC MODIFICAT
  • [2] [Anonymous], 200912 I RES ED POL
  • [3] The Decline of Bilingual Education: How to Reverse a Troubling Trend?
    Crawford, James
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL MULTILINGUAL RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2007, 1 (01) : 33 - 37
  • [4] Dee T., 2006, W12199 NBER
  • [5] Fry R., 2008, The role of schools in the English language learner achievement gap
  • [6] Gandara P., 2008, Language Policy, V7, P201, DOI [DOI 10.1007/S10993-008-9097-4, 10.1007/s10993-008-9097-4]
  • [7] *GOV ACC OFF, 2006, NO CHILD LEFT BEH AC
  • [8] Menken K, 2008, BILING EDUC BILING, V65, P1
  • [9] Menken K., 2009, CRITICAL PEDAGOGY TE, V6, P49
  • [10] How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening?
    Nation, I. S. P.
    [J]. CANADIAN MODERN LANGUAGE REVIEW-REVUE CANADIENNE DES LANGUES VIVANTES, 2006, 63 (01): : 59 - 82