Possible sources of the difference between a model prediction and observations of bow shock crossings

被引:2
作者
Dmitriev, AV [1 ]
Chao, JK
Yang, YH
Lin, CH
Wu, DJ
机构
[1] Natl Cent Univ, Inst Space Sci, Chungli 32054, Taiwan
[2] Acad Sinica, Purple Mt Observ, Naking, Peoples R China
[3] Nan Jeon Inst Technol, Dept Elect Engn, Yen Shui, Taiwan
来源
TERRESTRIAL ATMOSPHERIC AND OCEANIC SCIENCES | 2002年 / 13卷 / 04期
关键词
bow shock; solar wind plasma; interplanetary magnetic field; solar cycle;
D O I
10.3319/TAO.2002.13.4.499(A)
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
The new data set of 1901 bow shock crossings by Geotail and Wind satellites in period 1999-2000 is selected for a wide range of distances and solar wind conditions observed by Wind and ACE upstream monitors. The data set is applied for verification of the semi-empirical bow shock model developed in the last solar minimum (1995-1997), using Geotail crossings of the bow shock and Wind upstream solar wind data. In general, the model accuracy is reasonably good in the dayside and flank regions of the bow shock. But, the model extrapolation in the tail region has much less accuracy due to restriction of the bow' shock crossing distances used in the model development. Some difference between the data of ACE and Wind upstream solar wind monitors leads also to the model discrepancies. Analysis of long time variations of the bow shock parameters during last three solar cycles shows noticeable difference in the heliospheric conditions controlling the bow shock size and shape in the solar minimum and maximum. In the solar maximum, the variations of the interplanetary conditions are much higher than in the solar minimum. This difference produces additional disagreement in prediction of the bow shock crossings in the current solar maximum by the model developed using a data set obtained in the solar minimum.
引用
收藏
页码:499 / 521
页数:23
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]   MHD SIMULATIONS OF EARTHS BOW SHOCK AT LOW MACH NUMBERS - STANDOFF DISTANCES [J].
CAIRNS, IH ;
LYON, JG .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 1995, 100 (A9) :17173-17180
[2]  
CHAO JK, 2002, MODELS SIZE SHAPE EA
[3]  
CHAO JK, 1999, AGU 1999 FALL M, V80, pF897
[4]   Density extremes in the solar wind [J].
Crooker, NU ;
Shodhan, S ;
Gosling, JT ;
Simmerer, J ;
Lepping, RP ;
Steinberg, JT ;
Kahler, SW .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2000, 27 (23) :3769-3772
[5]   DETERMINING THE STANDOFF DISTANCE OF THE BOW SHOCK - MACH NUMBER DEPENDENCE AND USE OF MODELS [J].
FARRIS, MH ;
RUSSELL, CT .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 1994, 99 (A9) :17681-17689
[6]   Solar-cycle variation of low density solar wind during more than three solar cycles [J].
Richardson, IG ;
Berdichevsky, D ;
Desch, MD ;
Farrugia, CJ .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2000, 27 (23) :3761-3764
[7]   Toward predicting the position of the magnetopause within geosynchronous orbit [J].
Shue, JH ;
Song, P ;
Russell, CT ;
Chao, JK ;
Yang, YH .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2000, 105 (A2) :2641-2656
[8]  
Spreiter J. R., 1992, GEOPHYS MONOGR SER, V66, P345
[9]   HYDROMAGNETIC FLOW AROUND MAGNETOSPHERE [J].
SPREITER, JR ;
SUMMERS, AL ;
ALKSNE, AY .
PLANETARY AND SPACE SCIENCE, 1966, 14 (03) :223-&
[10]   Studies of the Martian bow shock response to the variation of the magnetosphere dimensions according to TAUS and MAGMA measurements aboard the Phobos 2 orbiter [J].
Verigin, MI ;
Kotova, GA ;
Remizov, AP ;
Shutte, NM ;
Schwingenschuh, K ;
Riedler, W ;
Zhang, TL ;
Rosenbauer, H ;
Szego, K ;
Tatrallyay, M ;
Styazhkin, V .
PLANETARY IONOSPHERES AND MAGNETOSPHERES, 1997, 20 (02) :155-158