Exploring the views of people with mental health problems' on the concept of coercion: Towards a broader socio-ethical perspective

被引:54
作者
Norvoll, Reidun [1 ]
Pedersen, Reidar [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oslo, Inst Hlth & Soc, Ctr Med Eth, Postbox 1130 Blindern, N-0318 Oslo, Norway
关键词
Coercion; Power; Mental health services; Patient acceptance of health care; Norway; PSYCHIATRIC-PATIENTS; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; CARE; POWER; PERCEPTIONS; CONTEXT; INSIGHT;
D O I
10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.03.033
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
In mental health care, coercion is a controversial issue that has led to much debate and research on its nature and use. Yet, few previous studies have explicitly explored the views on the concept of coercion among people with first-hand experiences of being coerced. This study includes semi-structured focus groups and individual interviews with 24 participants who had various mental health problems and experiences with coercion. Data were collected in 2012-2013 in three regions of Norway and analysed by a thematic content analysis. Findings show that participants had wide-ranging accounts of coercion, including formal and informal coercion across health- and welfare services. They emphasised that using coercion reflects the mental health system's tendency to rely on coercion and the lack of voluntary services and treatment methods that are more helpful. Other core characteristics of coercion were deprivation of freedom, power relations, in terms of powerlessness and 'counter-power,' and coercion as existential and social life events. Participants' views are consistent with prevailing theories of coercion and research on perceived coercion. However, this study demonstrates a need for broader existential and socio-ethical perspectives on coercion that are intertwined with treatment and care systems in research and practice. Implications for mental health policy and services are discussed. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:204 / 211
页数:8
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   FOCUS GROUPS AND ETHNOGRAPHY [J].
AGAR, M ;
MACDONALD, J .
HUMAN ORGANIZATION, 1995, 54 (01) :78-86
[2]  
Anderson Scott., 2014, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
[3]  
[Anonymous], ESSENTIAL WORKS M FO
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1993, Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action
[5]   Negative and Positive Freedom: Lessons from, and to, Sociology [J].
Bowring, Finn .
SOCIOLOGY-THE JOURNAL OF THE BRITISH SOCIOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION, 2015, 49 (01) :156-171
[6]  
Bremnes R, 2014, BRUK TVANG PSYKISK H
[7]   Pressures to adhere to treatment ('leverage') in English mental healthcare [J].
Burns, Tom ;
Yeeles, Ksenija ;
Molodynski, Andrew ;
Nightingale, Helen ;
Vazquez-Montes, Maria ;
Sheehan, Kathleen ;
Linsell, Louise .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2011, 199 (02) :145-150
[8]   THE CONCEPT OF POWER [J].
DAHL, RA .
BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE, 1957, 2 (03) :201-215
[9]   Interpretive flexibility:: Why doesn't insight incite controversy in mental health law? [J].
Diesfeld, Kate ;
Doctorate, Juris ;
Sjostrom, Stefan .
BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES & THE LAW, 2007, 25 (01) :85-101
[10]  
Feinberg J., 1986, MORAL LIMITS CRIMINA, V3