Closure periods for access to public records and archives. Comparative-historical analysis

被引:4
作者
Ctvrtnik, Mikulas [1 ]
机构
[1] State Reg Arch Prague, Archivni 2257-4, Prague 14900, Czech Republic
关键词
Access to archives; Closure periods; Data protection; Freedom of information; Privacy protection; Records management;
D O I
10.1007/s10502-021-09361-4
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
The article examines the application of closure periods for access to public records and archives, their development in some illustrative countries and the impact it has on the public-state relationship and the possibilities of public inspection of records. One level of this study presents a comparative analysis of current legislation in selected countries (United Kingdom, United States of America, France, Germany, Sweden, Switzerland, Czech Republic) and in the European Union as a whole. On the second level, the text aims to capture some contours of the historical development of closure periods since the end of World War II, primarily using the United Kingdom as an example of development which has served as a model in many countries and foreshadowed this whole domain. The study demonstrates that, over time, a gradual release occurs in what was initially a very restrictive regime of access to public records and historical sources; and also shows how this is happening and how it can happen. In conclusion, the text specifically notices the relationship of closure periods and public records and archives, together with the right to access information.
引用
收藏
页码:317 / 351
页数:35
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Aldrich Richard J., 1998, Twentieth Century British History, V9, P111
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2014, SCHWEIZER APARTHEID
[3]  
Barendt E, 2009, INDIANA LAW J, V84, P851
[4]   Executive order no. 13,233: A threat to government accountability [J].
Barker, AN .
GOVERNMENT INFORMATION QUARTERLY, 2005, 22 (01) :4-19
[5]  
Bennett G., 2002, Intelligence and National Security, V17, P21, DOI DOI 10.1080/02684520412331306390
[6]  
Blanton Thomas S., 1995, White House E-Mail: The Top Secret Computer Messages the Reagan/Bush White House Tried to Destroy
[7]  
Bookbinder N, 2020, COMMUNICATION 1112
[8]  
Der Bundesrat, 2014, SUD BUND HEBT ZUG AR
[9]  
Elliott Mark, 2017, PUBLIC LAW, DOI [10.1093/he/9780198765899.001.0001, DOI 10.1093/HE/9780198765899.001.0001]
[10]  
Emerson T.I., 1976, Washington University Law Quarterly, V1, P1