Box-Particle Probability Hypothesis Density Filtering

被引:20
作者
Schikora, Marek [1 ]
Gning, Amadou [2 ]
Mihaylova, Lyudmila [3 ]
Cremers, Daniel [4 ]
Koch, Wolfgang [1 ]
机构
[1] Fraunhofer FKIE, Dept Sensor Data & Informat Fus, Wachtberg, Germany
[2] UCL, Dept Comp Sci, London WC1E 6BT, England
[3] Univ Sheffield, Dept Automat Control & Syst Engn, Sheffield S10 2TN, S Yorkshire, England
[4] Tech Univ Munich, Dept Comp Sci, D-80290 Munich, Germany
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
TRACKING; PHD; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1109/TAES.2014.120238
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
This paper develops a novel approach for multitarget tracking, called box-particle probability hypothesis density filter (box-PHD filter). The approach is able to track multiple targets and estimates the unknown number of targets. Furthermore, it is capable of dealing with three sources of uncertainty: stochastic, set-theoretic, and data association uncertainty. The box-PHD filter reduces the number of particles significantly, which improves the runtime considerably. The small number of box-particles makes this approach attractive for distributed inference, especially when particles have to be shared over networks. A box-particle is a random sample that occupies a small and controllable rectangular region of non-zero volume. Manipulation of boxes utilizes methods from the field of interval analysis. The theoretical derivation of the box-PHD filter is presented followed by a comparative analysis with a standard sequential Monte Carlo (SMC) version of the PHD filter. To measure the performance objectively three measures are used: inclusion, volume, and the optimum subpattern assignment (OSPA) metric. Our studies suggest that the box-PHD filter reaches similar accuracy results, like an SMC-PHD filter but with considerably less computational costs. Furthermore, we can show that in the presence of strongly biased measurement the box-PHD filter even outperforms the classical SMC-PHD filter.
引用
收藏
页码:1660 / 1672
页数:13
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Box particle filtering for nonlinear state estimation using interval analysis [J].
Abdallah, Fahed ;
Gning, Amadou ;
Bonnifait, Philippe .
AUTOMATICA, 2008, 44 (03) :807-815
[2]  
Anderson B.D.O., 1979, Optimal Filtering
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1997, Uncertainty Management in Information Systems, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4615-6245-0_8
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2001, APPL INTERVAL ANAL
[5]  
[Anonymous], C INF SCI SYST
[6]  
Bar-Shalom Y, 1988, Tracking and data association
[7]  
COMBETTES PL, 1993, P IEEE, V81, P182, DOI 10.1109/5.214546
[8]   A survey of convergence results on particle filtering methods for practitioners [J].
Crisan, D ;
Doucet, A .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2002, 50 (03) :736-746
[9]  
Erdinc O., 2005, P 8 INT C INF FUS FU
[10]   The Bin-Occupancy Filter and Its Connection to the PHD Filters [J].
Erdinc, Ozgur ;
Willett, Peter ;
Bar-Shalom, Yaakov .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2009, 57 (11) :4232-4246