Trap Array Configuration Influences Estimates and Precision of Black Bear Density and Abundance

被引:53
作者
Wilton, Clay M. [1 ]
Puckett, Emily E. [2 ]
Beringer, Jeff [3 ]
Gardner, Beth [4 ]
Eggert, Lori S. [2 ]
Belant, Jerrold L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mississippi State Univ, Forest & Wildlife Res Ctr, Carnivore Ecol Lab, Mississippi State, MS 39762 USA
[2] Univ Missouri, Div Biol Sci, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
[3] Missouri Dept Conservat, Columbia, MO USA
[4] N Carolina State Univ, Dept Forestry & Environm Resources, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
来源
PLOS ONE | 2014年 / 9卷 / 10期
关键词
ESTIMATING POPULATION-SIZE; MARK-RECAPTURE; GENETIC-STRUCTURE; URSUS-AMERICANUS; NATIONAL-PARK; CAMERA-TRAPS; DNA DATA; CAPTURE; MODELS; HABITAT;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0111257
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Spatial capture-recapture (SCR) models have advanced our ability to estimate population density for wide ranging animals by explicitly incorporating individual movement. Though these models are more robust to various spatial sampling designs, few studies have empirically tested different large-scale trap configurations using SCR models. We investigated how extent of trap coverage and trap spacing affects precision and accuracy of SCR parameters, implementing models using the R package secr. We tested two trapping scenarios, one spatially extensive and one intensive, using black bear (Ursus americanus) DNA data from hair snare arrays in south-central Missouri, USA. We also examined the influence that adding a second, lower barbed-wire strand to snares had on quantity and spatial distribution of detections. We simulated trapping data to test bias in density estimates of each configuration under a range of density and detection parameter values. Field data showed that using multiple arrays with intensive snare coverage produced more detections of more individuals than extensive coverage. Consequently, density and detection parameters were more precise for the intensive design. Density was estimated as 1.7 bears per 100 km(2) and was 5.5 times greater than that under extensive sampling. Abundance was 279 (95% CI = 193-406) bears in the 16,812 km(2) study area. Excluding detections from the lower strand resulted in the loss of 35 detections, 14 unique bears, and the largest recorded movement between snares. All simulations showed low bias for density under both configurations. Results demonstrated that in low density populations with non-uniform distribution of population density, optimizing the tradeoff among snare spacing, coverage, and sample size is of critical importance to estimating parameters with high precision and accuracy. With limited resources, allocating available traps to multiple arrays with intensive trap spacing increased the amount of information needed to inform parameters with high precision.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 86 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2002, ANAL MANAGEMENT ANIM
  • [2] Apps CD, 2004, J WILDLIFE MANAGE, V68, P138, DOI 10.2193/0022-541X(2004)068[0138:EGBDAA]2.0.CO
  • [3] 2
  • [4] Estimating population size and density of a low-density population of black bears in Rocky Mountain National Park, Colorado
    Baldwin, Roger A.
    Bender, Louis C.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE RESEARCH, 2012, 58 (03) : 557 - 566
  • [5] Bales SL, 2005, WILDLIFE SOC B, V33, P1342, DOI 10.2193/0091-7648(2005)33[1342:DOARPO]2.0.CO
  • [6] 2
  • [7] Belant JL, 2005, URSUS, V16, P85, DOI 10.2192/1537-6176(2005)016[0085:ABBPSA]2.0.CO
  • [8] 2
  • [9] DENSITY-ESTIMATION AS A FUNCTION OF LIVE-TRAPPING GRID AND HOME RANGE SIZE
    BONDRUPNIELSEN, S
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE ZOOLOGIE, 1983, 61 (10): : 2361 - 2365
  • [10] Spatially explicit maximum likelihood methods for capture-recapture studies
    Borchers, D. L.
    Efford, M. G.
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 2008, 64 (02) : 377 - 385