Joint establishment of the geomagnetic model for mainland China based on CHAMP satellite and surface vector data

被引:6
作者
Feng Yan [1 ,2 ]
Sun Han [3 ]
Jiang Yong [1 ]
An Zhen-Chang [4 ]
Jiang Yi [1 ]
Liu Bao-Jia [1 ]
Huang Ya [2 ]
Zhang Hua [1 ]
Wu Ye-Wen [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Inst Space Weather, Nanjing 210044, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, State Key Lab Space Weather, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China
[3] Xintianyuan Inst Disaster Prevent & Reduct, Inner Mongolia 010051, Hohhot, Peoples R China
[4] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geol & Geophys, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China
来源
CHINESE JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICS-CHINESE EDITION | 2017年 / 60卷 / 07期
关键词
Geomagnetic field; Joint modeling; Spherical Cap Harmonic model; Chinese Meridian project; CHAMP satellite; CM4; IGRF12; CAP HARMONIC-ANALYSIS; LITHOSPHERIC MAGNETIC-FIELD; SECULAR VARIATION;
D O I
10.6038/cjg20170702
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
We firstly made a pre-processing to vector data of magnetism from surface observational stations and CHAMP satellite, along with newest 12 Chinese Meridian Project observations; then put all data into a specific time point by the 12th generation International Reference Field (IGRF12) model. Moreover, the external fields that include the main field, ionospheric field, magnetospheric field, their induced field, and the weak toroidal magnetic field were respectively removed by IGRF12 and the 4th generation Comprehensive Model (CM4) models. Finally, the China lithospheric field (elements X, Y, Z and F) model (SCH2000) was created by the spherical cap harmonic model, and the China geomagnetic field (CGRF2000) was created by IGRF12. During the modeling process, the effects from the altitude term, the selection of truncation level and the control of boundary were seriously considered. In terms of comparison of the Root-Mean-Square (RMS) error and so on, the SCH2000 with degree 8 was thought to be an ideal joint model to describe the lithospheric field over China, which were also compared with models like SCH1936, CM4 and Taylor polynomial. We found that their results, to some degrees, are consistent.. In view of location and intensity, SCH2000 reflects the lithospheric field more precisely compared to other regional models. Some differences between SCH2000 and CM4 mainly result from the measuring data and truncation level. Comparison shows the variations with altitudes are close between SCH2000 and CM4. As for the distributions of magnetic fields, there is also a good consistence between CGRF2000 and IGRF12 models.
引用
收藏
页码:2522 / 2533
页数:12
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] RECTANGULAR HARMONIC-ANALYSIS APPLIED TO THE GEOMAGNETIC-FIELD
    ALLDREDGE, LR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, 1981, 86 (NB4): : 3021 - 3026
  • [2] An ZC, 2000, CHINESE J GEOPHYS-CH, V43, P339
  • [3] An ZC, 2003, CHINESE J GEOPHYS-CH, V46, P624
  • [4] An ZC., 1981, CHIN J SPACE SCI, V1, P68, DOI DOI 10.11728/CJSS1981.01.068
  • [5] [Anonymous], 1998, ACTA GEOPHYSICAL SIN
  • [6] Analyses of geomagnetic field and its secular variation over China for 2005. 0 epoch using Spherical Cap Harmonic method
    Chen Bin
    Gu Zuo-Wen
    Gao Jin-Tian
    Yuan Jie-Hao
    Di Chuan-Zhi
    [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICS-CHINESE EDITION, 2011, 54 (03): : 771 - 779
  • [7] [冯彦 Feng Yan], 2010, [地球物理学进展, Progress in Geophysiscs], V25, P1947
  • [8] DTU candidate field models for IGRF-12 and the CHAOS-5 geomagnetic field model
    Finlay, Christopher C.
    Olsen, Nils
    Toffner-Clausen, Lars
    [J]. EARTH PLANETS AND SPACE, 2015, 67
  • [9] Flechtner F, 2010, ADV TECHNOL EARTH SC, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-10228-8
  • [10] HAINES GV, 1985, J GEOPHYS RES, V90, P2583, DOI 10.1029/JB090iB03p02583