Difficulty of the decision-making process in emergency departments for end-of-life patients

被引:20
作者
Douplat, Marion [1 ,2 ]
Berthiller, Julien [3 ]
Schott, Anne-Marie [3 ]
Potinet, Veronique [1 ]
Le Coz, Pierre [2 ]
Tazarourte, Karim [4 ]
Jacquin, Laurent [4 ]
机构
[1] Hop Lyon Sud, Hosp Civils Lyon, Serv Accueil Urgences, 165 Chemin Grand Revoyet, F-69495 Pierre Benite, France
[2] Aix Marseille Univ, EFS, CNRS, UMR 7268 ADeS,Fac Med, 27 Blvd Jean Moulin, F-13005 Marseille, France
[3] Hosp Civils Lyon, Pole Informat Med Evaluat Rech, Lyon, France
[4] Hosp Civiles Lyon, Serv Accueil Urgences, Hop Edouard Herriot, 5 Pl Arsonval, F-69003 Lyon, France
关键词
advance directives; death; decision making; emergency service; INTENSIVE-CARE UNITS; GENERAL-PRACTITIONER; PALLIATIVE CARE; FAMILY-MEMBERS; WITHDRAWAL; SUPPORT; DEATH; COMMUNICATION; RISK;
D O I
10.1111/jep.13229
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background In emergency departments, for some patients, death is preceded by a decision of withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining treatments. This concerns mainly patients over 80, with many comorbidities. The decision-making process of these decisions in emergency departments has not been extensively studied, especially for noncommunicating patients. Aim The purpose of this study is to describe the decision-making process of withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatments in emergency departments for noncommunicating patients and the outcome of said patients. Design We conducted a prospective multicenter study in three emergency departments of university hospitals from September 2015 to January 2017. Results We included 109 patients in the study. Fifty-eight (53.2%) patients were coming from nursing homes and 52 (47.7%) patients had dementia. Decisions of withholding life-sustaining treatment concerned 93 patients (85.3%) and were more frequent when a surrogate decision maker was present 61 (65.6%) versus seven (43.8%) patients. The most relevant factors that lead to these decisions were previous functional limitation (71.6%) and age (69.7%). Decision was taken by two physicians for 80 patients (73.4%). The nursing staff and general practitioner were, respectively, involved in 31 (28.4%) and two (1.8%) patients. A majority of the patients had no advance directives (89.9%), and the relatives were implicated in the decision-making process for 96 patients (88.1%). Death in emergency departments occurred for 47 patients (43.1%), and after 21 days, 84 patients (77.1 %) died. Conclusion There is little anticipation in end-of-life decisions. Discussion with patients concerning their end-of-life wishes and the writing of advance directives, especially for patients with chronic diseases, must be encouraged early.
引用
收藏
页码:1193 / 1199
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
[11]   Participation of French general practitioners in end-of-life decisions for their hospitalised patients [J].
Ferrand, E. ;
Jabre, P. ;
Fernandez-Curiel, S. ;
Morin, F. ;
Vincent-Genod, C. ;
Duvaldestin, P. ;
Lemaire, F. ;
Herve, C. ;
Marty, J. .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2006, 32 (12) :683-687
[12]   Withholding and withdrawal of life support in intensive-care units in France: a prospective survey [J].
Ferrand, E ;
Robert, R ;
Ingrand, P ;
Lemaire, F .
LANCET, 2001, 357 (9249) :9-14
[13]  
Hall S., 2011, Palliative care for older people: Better practices
[14]   A retrospective review of a large cohort of patients undergoing the process of withholding or withdrawal of life support [J].
Keenan, SP ;
Busche, KD ;
Chen, LM ;
McCarthy, L ;
Inman, KJ ;
Sibbald, WJ .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1997, 25 (08) :1324-1331
[15]   A qualitative study exploring the difficulties influencing decision making at the end of life for people with dementia [J].
Lamahewa, Kethakie ;
Mathew, Rammya ;
Iliffe, Steve ;
Wilcock, Jane ;
Manthorpe, Jill ;
Sampson, Elizabeth L. ;
Davies, Nathan .
HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2018, 21 (01) :118-127
[16]   From emergency department to general practitioner: Evaluating emergency department communication and service to. general practitioners [J].
Lane, Nigel ;
Bragg, Matthew J. .
EMERGENCY MEDICINE AUSTRALASIA, 2007, 19 (04) :346-352
[17]   Withholding and withdrawing life-support therapy in an Emergency Department:: prospective survey [J].
Le Conte, P ;
Baron, D ;
Trewick, D ;
Touzé, MD ;
Longo, C ;
Vial, I ;
Yatim, D ;
Potel, G .
INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2004, 30 (12) :2216-2221
[18]   Death in emergency departments: a multicenter cross-sectional survey with analysis of withholding and withdrawing life support [J].
Le Conte, Philippe ;
Riochet, David ;
Batard, Eric ;
Volteau, Christelle ;
Giraudeau, Bruno ;
Arnaudet, Idriss ;
Labastire, Laetitia ;
Levraut, Jacques ;
Thys, Frederic ;
Lauque, Dominique ;
Piva, Claude ;
Schmidt, Jeannot ;
Trewick, David ;
Potel, Gilles .
INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2010, 36 (05) :765-772
[19]   Symptom experiences of family members of intensive care unit patients at high risk for dying [J].
McAdam, Jennifer L. ;
Dracup, Kathleen A. ;
White, Douglas B. ;
Fontaine, Dorothy K. ;
Puntillo, Kathleen A. .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2010, 38 (04) :1078-1085
[20]   Death in two Canadian intensive care units: Institutional difference and changes over time [J].
McLean, RF ;
Tarshis, J ;
Mazer, CD ;
Szalai, JP .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2000, 28 (01) :100-103