Difficulty of the decision-making process in emergency departments for end-of-life patients

被引:20
作者
Douplat, Marion [1 ,2 ]
Berthiller, Julien [3 ]
Schott, Anne-Marie [3 ]
Potinet, Veronique [1 ]
Le Coz, Pierre [2 ]
Tazarourte, Karim [4 ]
Jacquin, Laurent [4 ]
机构
[1] Hop Lyon Sud, Hosp Civils Lyon, Serv Accueil Urgences, 165 Chemin Grand Revoyet, F-69495 Pierre Benite, France
[2] Aix Marseille Univ, EFS, CNRS, UMR 7268 ADeS,Fac Med, 27 Blvd Jean Moulin, F-13005 Marseille, France
[3] Hosp Civils Lyon, Pole Informat Med Evaluat Rech, Lyon, France
[4] Hosp Civiles Lyon, Serv Accueil Urgences, Hop Edouard Herriot, 5 Pl Arsonval, F-69003 Lyon, France
关键词
advance directives; death; decision making; emergency service; INTENSIVE-CARE UNITS; GENERAL-PRACTITIONER; PALLIATIVE CARE; FAMILY-MEMBERS; WITHDRAWAL; SUPPORT; DEATH; COMMUNICATION; RISK;
D O I
10.1111/jep.13229
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background In emergency departments, for some patients, death is preceded by a decision of withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining treatments. This concerns mainly patients over 80, with many comorbidities. The decision-making process of these decisions in emergency departments has not been extensively studied, especially for noncommunicating patients. Aim The purpose of this study is to describe the decision-making process of withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatments in emergency departments for noncommunicating patients and the outcome of said patients. Design We conducted a prospective multicenter study in three emergency departments of university hospitals from September 2015 to January 2017. Results We included 109 patients in the study. Fifty-eight (53.2%) patients were coming from nursing homes and 52 (47.7%) patients had dementia. Decisions of withholding life-sustaining treatment concerned 93 patients (85.3%) and were more frequent when a surrogate decision maker was present 61 (65.6%) versus seven (43.8%) patients. The most relevant factors that lead to these decisions were previous functional limitation (71.6%) and age (69.7%). Decision was taken by two physicians for 80 patients (73.4%). The nursing staff and general practitioner were, respectively, involved in 31 (28.4%) and two (1.8%) patients. A majority of the patients had no advance directives (89.9%), and the relatives were implicated in the decision-making process for 96 patients (88.1%). Death in emergency departments occurred for 47 patients (43.1%), and after 21 days, 84 patients (77.1 %) died. Conclusion There is little anticipation in end-of-life decisions. Discussion with patients concerning their end-of-life wishes and the writing of advance directives, especially for patients with chronic diseases, must be encouraged early.
引用
收藏
页码:1193 / 1199
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2017, EUR REC END OF LIF C
[2]   Risk of post-traumatic stress symptoms in family members of intensive care unit patients [J].
Azoulay, E ;
Pochard, F ;
Kentish-Barnes, N ;
Chevret, S ;
Aboab, J ;
Adrie, C ;
Annane, D ;
Bleichner, G ;
Bollaert, PE ;
Darmon, M ;
Fassier, T ;
Galliot, R ;
Garrouste-Orgeas, M ;
Goulenok, C ;
Goldgran-Toledano, D ;
Hayon, J ;
Jourdain, M ;
Kaidomar, M ;
Laplace, C ;
Larché, J ;
Liotier, J ;
Papazian, L ;
Poisson, C ;
Reignier, J ;
Saidi, F ;
Schlemmer, B .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2005, 171 (09) :987-994
[3]   End-of-life models and emergency department care [J].
Chan, GK .
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2004, 11 (01) :79-86
[4]   US Physicians' Opinions about Distinctions between Withdrawing and Withholding Life-Sustaining Treatment [J].
Chung, Grace S. ;
Yoon, John D. ;
Rasinski, Kenneth A. ;
Curlin, Farr A. .
JOURNAL OF RELIGION & HEALTH, 2016, 55 (05) :1596-1606
[5]  
Cook I, 2017, GERONTOL GERIATR MED, V3, DOI 10.1177/2333721417713422
[6]   Withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining therapy in a Moroccan Emergency Department: An observational study [J].
Damghi N. ;
Belayachi J. ;
Aggoug B. ;
Dendane T. ;
Abidi K. ;
Madani N. ;
Zekraoui A. ;
Benchekroun Belabes A. ;
Zeggwagh A.A. ;
Abouqal R. .
BMC Emergency Medicine, 11 (1)
[7]   Physicians' experience in decisions of withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatments: A multicenter survey into emergency departments [J].
Douplat, Marion ;
Jacquin, Laurent ;
Tazarourte, Karim ;
Michelet, Pierre ;
Le Coz, Pierre .
ANAESTHESIA CRITICAL CARE & PAIN MEDICINE, 2018, 37 (06) :633-634
[8]   Guidelines for the withdrawal of life-sustaining measures [J].
Downar, James ;
Delaney, Jesse W. ;
Hawryluck, Laura ;
Kenny, Lisa .
INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2016, 42 (06) :1003-1017
[9]   Withdrawing and withholding life support in the intensive care unit:: a Spanish prospective multi-centre observational study [J].
Esteban, A ;
Gordo, F ;
Solsona, JF ;
Alía, I ;
Caballero, J ;
Bouza, C ;
Alcalá-Zamora, J ;
Cook, DJ ;
Sanchez, JM ;
Abizanda, R ;
Miró, G ;
del Cabo, MJF ;
de Miguel, E ;
Santos, JA ;
Balerdi, B .
INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2001, 27 (11) :1744-1749
[10]   Withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining therapies from adult patients in emergency care [J].
Feral-Pierssens, A-L ;
Boulain, T. ;
Carpentier, F. ;
Le Borgne, P. ;
Del Nista, D. ;
Potel, G. ;
Dray, S. ;
Hugenschmitt, D. ;
Laurent, A. ;
Ricard-Hibon, A. ;
Vanderlinden, T. ;
Chouihed, T. ;
Reignier, J. .
ANNALES FRANCAISES DE MEDECINE D URGENCE, 2018, 8 (04) :246-251