A decision aid to support family carers of people living with dementia towards the end-of-life: Coproduction process, outcome and reflections

被引:22
作者
Davies, Nathan [1 ,2 ]
Sampson, Elizabeth L. [2 ,3 ]
West, Emily [2 ]
DeSouza, Tanisha [1 ]
Manthorpe, Jill [4 ,5 ]
Moore, Kirsten [2 ,6 ]
Walters, Kate [1 ]
Dening, Karen Harrison [7 ]
Ward, Jane [8 ]
Rait, Greta [1 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Dept Primary Care & Populat Hlth, Royal Free Campus, London NW3 2PF, England
[2] UCL, Marie Curie Palliat Care Res Dept, London, England
[3] North Middlesex Univ Hosp, Liaison Psychiat Team, Barnet Enfield & Haringey Mental Hlth Trust, London, England
[4] Kings Coll London, NIHR Policy Res Unit Hlth & Social Care Workforce, Policy Inst, London, England
[5] Kings Coll London, NIHR Appl Res Collaborat ARC South London, London, England
[6] Natl Ageing Res Inst, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[7] Dementia UK & Admiral Nursing, London, England
[8] Experts Experience Panel, Reading, Berks, England
关键词
carers; codesign; coproduction; decision-making; dementia; end-of-life care; INTERVENTION; FRAMEWORK; PATIENT; FACILITATORS; BARRIERS; DELPHI; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1111/hex.13307
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Family carers of people living with dementia often need support with making decisions about care. Many find end-of-life care decisions particularly difficult. The aim of this article is to present an evidence- and theoretical-based process for developing a decision aid to support family carers of people with dementia towards the end-of-life. Methods Following a systematic process, we developed a decision aid using coproduction methods and matrices to synthesize data from a systematic review and qualitative interviews with people living with dementia and family carers. Data were presented to coproduction workshops of people living with dementia, family carers, practitioners and professionals. Development was guided by the Ottawa Decision Support Framework and a modified Interprofessional Shared Decision-Making model. Results The decision aid covers four decision areas: (1) changes in care; (2) eating and drinking difficulties; (3) everyday well-being; and (4) healthcare, tests and medication. We present an interactive decision aid, using a variety of approaches including written text, Frequently Asked Questions, top tips and illustrative quotes from people living with dementia and family carers. Conclusion This is the first decision aid that focusses on multiple decisions towards the end-of-life in dementia care. The process offers a template for others to develop decision aids or similar interventions, and how to include people living with dementia in coproduction. Patient or Public Contribution Family carers provided feedback on data collection, data analysis and the decision aid, and one is a coauthor. People living with dementia and family carers were integral to the coproduction workshops.
引用
收藏
页码:1677 / 1691
页数:15
相关论文
共 55 条
  • [1] Balancing the presentation of information and options in patient decision aids: an updated review
    Abhyankar, Purva
    Volk, Robert J.
    Blumenthal-Barby, Jennifer
    Bravo, Paulina
    Buchholz, Angela
    Ozanne, Elissa
    Vidal, Dale Colins
    Col, Nananda
    Stalmeier, Peep
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2013, 13
  • [2] Patient engagement in research related to dementia: A scoping review
    Bethell, Jennifer
    Commisso, Elana
    Rostad, Hanne Marie
    Puts, Martine
    Babineau, Jessica
    Grinbergs-Saull, Anna
    Wighton, Mary Beth
    Hammel, John
    Doyle, Elizabeth
    Nadeau, Sacha
    McGilton, Katherine S.
    [J]. DEMENTIA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2018, 17 (08): : 944 - 975
  • [3] Effectiveness of advance care planning with family carers in dementia nursing homes: A paired cluster randomized controlled trial
    Brazil, Kevin
    Carter, Gillian
    Cardwell, Chris
    Clarke, Mike
    Hudson, Peter
    Froggatt, Katherine
    McLaughlin, Dorry
    Passmore, Peter
    Kernohan, W. George
    [J]. PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2018, 32 (03) : 603 - 612
  • [4] NHS England statistics and long-term plan
    Burki, Talha Khan
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2019, 20 (02) : 187 - 187
  • [5] The experiences and preparedness of family carers for best interest decision-making of a relative living with advanced dementia: A qualitative study
    Carter, Gillian
    McLaughlin, Dorry
    Kernohan, W. George
    Hudson, Peter
    Clarke, Mike
    Froggatt, Katherine
    Passmore, Peter
    Brazil, Kevin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2018, 74 (07) : 1595 - 1604
  • [6] A systematic development process for patient decision aids
    Coulter, Angela
    Stilwell, Diana
    Kryworuchko, Jennifer
    Mullen, Patricia Dolan
    Ng, Chirk Jenn
    van der Weijden, Trudy
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2013, 13
  • [7] Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance
    Craig, Peter
    Dieppe, Paul
    Macintyre, Sally
    Michie, Susan
    Nazareth, Irwin
    Petticrew, Mark
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2008, 337 (7676): : 979 - 983
  • [8] Shared decision-making for people living with dementia in extended care settings: a systematic review
    Daly, Rachel Louise
    Bunn, Frances
    Goodman, Claire
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2018, 8 (06):
  • [9] After the Liverpool Care Pathway-development of heuristics to guide end of life care for people with dementia: protocol of the ALCP study
    Davies, N.
    Manthorpe, J.
    Sampson, E. L.
    Iliffe, S.
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2015, 5 (09):
  • [10] Developing an applied model for making decisions towards the end of life about care for someone with dementia
    Davies, Nathan
    De Souza, Tanisha
    Rait, Greta
    Meehan, Jessica
    Sampson, Elizabeth L.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (05):