Optimization on fracturing fluid flowback model after hydraulic fracturing in oil well

被引:24
|
作者
Qu, Zhanqing [1 ]
Wang, Jiwei [1 ]
Guo, Tiankui [1 ]
Shen, Lin [2 ]
Liao, Hualin [1 ]
Liu, Xiaoqiang [1 ]
Fan, Jiacheng [1 ]
Hao, Tong [1 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Petr East China, Sch Petr Engn, Qingdao 266580, Peoples R China
[2] PetroChina Southwest Oil & Gas Field Co, Nat Gas Res Inst, Chengdu 610213, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Fracturing fluid flowback; Proppant regurgitation; Proppant settlement; Flowback simulation; Optimization model; SHALE; CONDUCTIVITY; SIMULATION; FAILURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.petrol.2021.108703
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
As an important part in the process of hydraulic fracturing, fracturing fluid flowback after fracturing will directly affect the productivity of the fractured wells. It is of great significance to carry out optimization research on the flowback working system of fracturing fluid (the time of flowback beginning and the size of flowback nozzles) to enhance the efficiency of fracturing. At present, researches on optimization model of fracturing fluid flowback have taken into account the effects of fracturing fluid loss and proppant reflux, while ignoring the effects of proppant sedimentation. A new calculation model of proppant regurgitation velocity has been established in recent years, but it is rarely used in the research of flowback working system. This study innovatively integrated the calculation model of modified proppant sedimentation velocity obtained through experiments, the new calculation model of critical proppant regurgitation velocity, and the wellhead pressure calculation model to form a comprehensive flowback model of fracturing fluid. Then coupled with the flowback criteria of quickly flowback, reducing proppant reflux, and maintaining proppant settlement degree (ratio of proppant settlement distance to crack height) less than 60%, an optimization model of fracturing fluid flowback is constructed and realized by MATLAB software programs. The optimization model were verified by four fractured wells in DaQing Oilfield. The effects of reservoir permeability, reservoir porosity, fracturing fluid density, and proppant particle size on wellhead pressure drop, fracturing fluid flowback rate, and proppant settlement degree were calculated and analyzed by using the above flowback model. The verification results show that the simulated wellhead pressure and flowback flowrate are in good agreement with the actual dataset, with the average errors of 11.9% and 11.6% respectively, which proves the accuracy of the flowback optimization model. Parametric analysis shows that, with the increase of reservoir permeability and reservoir porosity, the wellhead pressure drop velocity increases. When the permeability increases from 1mD to 5mD, the flowback rate of fracturing fluid and proppant settlement degree are reduced by 12.3% and 69.8% respectively. When the porosity increases from 9% to 36%, the proppant settlement degree fall by 25.2%. Moreover, the flowback rate of fracturing fluid decreases linearly and the proppant settlement degree increases linearly with the increase of fracturing fluid density; and the proppant settlement degree increases by 3.5 times when the proppant particle size increases from 0.25 mm to 1.65 mm. Therefore, choosing smaller fracturing fluid density and smaller proppant particle size can ensure higher fluid flowback efficiency and lower proppant settlement degree.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Perforation optimization of hydraulic fracturing of oil and gas well
    Zhu, Hai Yan
    Deng, Jin Gen
    Chen, Zi Jian
    An, Feng Chen
    Liu, Shu Jie
    Peng, Cheng Yong
    Wen, Min
    Dong, Guang
    GEOMECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2013, 5 (05) : 463 - 483
  • [2] An Artificial Intelligence Method for Flowback Control of Hydraulic Fracturing Fluid in Oil and Gas Wells
    Li, Ruixuan
    Wei, Hangxin
    Wang, Jingyuan
    Li, Bo
    Zheng, Xue
    Bai, Wei
    PROCESSES, 2023, 11 (06)
  • [3] Temporal variations in geochemistry of hydraulic fracturing fluid and flowback water in a tight oil reservoir
    Tian, Jie
    Wang, Liang
    Ni, Li-Pin
    Mou, Li-Wei
    Su, Shu-Te
    Ostadhassan, Mehdi
    PETROLEUM SCIENCE, 2023, 20 (05) : 3013 - 3021
  • [4] Temporal variations in geochemistry of hydraulic fracturing fluid and flowback water in a tight oil reservoir
    Jie Tian
    Liang Wang
    LiPin Ni
    LiWei Mou
    ShuTe Su
    Mehdi Ostadhassan
    Petroleum Science, 2023, 20 (05) : 3013 - 3021
  • [5] Characterization of flowback of fracturing fluids with upgraded visualization of hydraulic fracturing treatment & its implications on overall well performance
    Desai, Khush
    Aminzadeh, Fred
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2016, 251
  • [6] Research on Hydraulic Fracturing Flowback Optimized Design
    Qu, Zhanqing
    Zhou, Liping
    Li, Jianxiong
    Xu, Huaru
    4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MATERIALS ENGINEERING FOR ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES (ICMEAT 2015), 2015, : 251 - 255
  • [7] A model describing flowback chemistry changes with time after Marcellus Shale hydraulic fracturing
    Balashov, Victor N.
    Engelder, Terry
    Gu, Xin
    Fantle, Matthew S.
    Brantley, Susan L.
    AAPG BULLETIN, 2015, 99 (01) : 143 - 154
  • [8] New insights of further enhanced tight oil recovery after hydraulic fracturing by VES fracturing fluid
    Sun, Xin
    Hou, Shugang
    Dai, Caili
    Sun, Yongpeng
    Du, Huanfu
    Wang, Chunwei
    GEOENERGY SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2023, 227
  • [9] Isotopic characteristics of the excess hydraulic fracturing flowback fluid in tight oil reservoir: Implication for source, composition, and flowback stage division
    Liang, Wang
    Jun, Jia
    Haitao, Fan
    Juan, Shi
    Shute, Su
    Yu, Liu
    JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2022, 214
  • [10] A Review of Fracturing Fluid Systems Used For Hydraulic Fracturing of Oil and Gas Wells
    Barati, Reza
    Liang, Jenn-Tai
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE, 2014, 131 (16)