Visual and Refractive Outcomes in Manual versus Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Analysis of 1838 Eyes

Purpose: Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) has emerged as an alternative to manual cataract surgery (MCS) for corneal incision and capsulorhexis creation, as well as nuclear fragmentation. This study compares postoperative refractive and visual outcomes in eyes receiving MCS or FLACS. Design: Single-center, comparative, retrospective cohort analysis. Participants: Consecutive eyes receiving FLACS and MCS from July 1, 2012, to July 31, 2015, at a single tertiary care center. Methods: Demographic data, ocular history, preoperative measurements and biometry, and postoperative surgical results were retrospectively obtained and statistically analyzed using a generalized linear mixed model adjusting for differences in baseline characteristics and within-patient correlation. A 2-tailed P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant throughout the study. Main Outcome Measures: Percentage of eyes achieving absolute error (AE) <= 0.5 diopters (D). Secondary outcomes included percentage of eyes with AE <= 0.25 D and <= 1.0 D, and percentage of distance-targeted eyes achieving uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) of 20/20 or better, 20/25 or better, and 20/30 or better. Results: A total of 883 eyes received MCS and 955 received FLACS among 1089 patients. Some 82.6% of FLACS eyes and 78.8% of MCS eyes had <= 0.5 D of AE at 3 weeks, representing an adjusted odds ratio (OR) of 1.28 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.98-1.66) of FLACS relative to MCS being within target. Some 97.1% of FLACS and 97.2% of MCS eyes had <= 1.0 D of AE (OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.57-1.60) and 49.3% of FLACS and 46.3% of MCS eyes, <= 0.25 D of AE (OR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.91-1.39). Factors predictive of a favorable refractive outcome included axial length between 22 and 24.8 mm, receiving a toric intraocular lens, less preoperative cylinder, and greater preoperative average keratometry. There was no significant difference in the percentage of patients targeted for distance who achieved UDVA of 20/20 or better (P = 0.30), 20/25 or better (P = 0.06), or 20/30 or better (P = 0.66) vision. Conclusions: Postoperatively, there was no statistically significant difference found between eyes undergoing FLACS and eyes undergoing MCS with respect to refractive and visual outcomes. (C) 2018 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology