Evaluation of the Antarctic Boundary Layer Thermodynamic Structure in MERRA2 Using Dropsonde Observations from the Concordiasi Campaign

被引:8
作者
Ganeshan, Manisha [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Yuekui [2 ]
机构
[1] USRA, Goddard Earth Sci Technol & Res, Greenbelt, MD 20771 USA
[2] NASA, Goddard Space Flight Ctr, Greenbelt, MD 20771 USA
关键词
Antarctic boundary layer; MERRA2; thermodynamic structure; reanalyses; planetary boundary layer; dropsondes; DOME-C; PART I; SURFACE; MODEL; CLIMATE; TURBULENCE; TEMPERATURE; RADIATION; PLATEAU; WEATHER;
D O I
10.1029/2019EA000890
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
Recent high-resolution dropsonde observations from the 2010 Concordiasi field campaign in austral spring season show that surface-based inversions (SBIs) over Antarctica are frequently eroded, with well-mixed boundary layers occurring 33% and 18% of the time in West and East Antarctica, respectively. In this study, using the dropsonde observations, we evaluate the performance of the Modern-Era Retrospective analysis for Research and Applications, version 2 (MERRA2) in representing the Antarctic boundary layer thermodynamic structure. Results show that MERRA2 has a good overall representation of the Antarctic surface stability and correctly predicts 82% of the SBIs. However, an underprediction of less stable boundary layer occurrence, especially over the elevated East Antarctic plateau, is favored during conditions of increased lower tropospheric stability associated with model dynamics, indicating difficulty in parameterizing turbulence in very stable boundary layers. In addition, a lower tropospheric cool bias (first model level and above) is observed in the MERRA2 reanalysis, especially over West Antarctica, which amplifies in the boundary layer during mixed conditions. The near-surface cold bias is most pronounced when the model fails to predict mixed layers over West Antarctica and is expected to negatively impact the representation of surface energy budget and melt processes.
引用
收藏
页码:2397 / 2409
页数:13
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] Abdi H., 2007, Signal Detection Theory (SDT)
  • [2] Summer boundary-layer height at the plateau site of Dome C, Antarctica
    Argentini, S
    Viola, A
    Sempreviva, A
    Petenko, I
    [J]. BOUNDARY-LAYER METEOROLOGY, 2005, 115 (03) : 409 - 422
  • [3] An intercomparison of large-eddy simulations of the stable boundary layer
    Beare, RJ
    MacVean, MK
    Holtslag, AAM
    Cuxart, J
    Esau, I
    Golaz, JC
    Jimenez, MA
    Khairoutdinov, M
    Kosovic, B
    Lewellen, D
    Lund, TS
    Lundquist, JK
    McCabe, A
    Moene, AF
    Noh, Y
    Raasch, S
    Sullivan, P
    [J]. BOUNDARY-LAYER METEOROLOGY, 2006, 118 (02) : 247 - 272
  • [4] Beljaars A. C. M., 1998, ROLE BOUNDARY LAYER, P287
  • [5] Bosveld F., 1999, ECMWF RE ANAL PROJEC, V8
  • [6] Bosveld F. C., 2008, 18 S BOUND LAYERS TU, p8A
  • [7] Identification and intercomparison of surface-based inversions over Antarctica from IASI, ERA-Interim, and Concordiasi dropsonde data
    Boylan, Patrick
    Wang, Junhong
    Cohn, Stephen A.
    Hultberg, Tim
    August, Thomas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2016, 121 (15) : 9089 - 9104
  • [8] TROPOSPHERIC CLOUDS IN ANTARCTICA
    Bromwich, David H.
    Nicolas, Julien P.
    Hines, Keith M.
    Kay, Jennifer E.
    Key, Erica L.
    Lazzara, Matthew A.
    Lubin, Dan
    McFarquhar, Greg M.
    Gorodetskaya, Irina V.
    Grosvenor, Daniel P.
    Lachlan-Cope, Thomas
    van Lipzig, Nicole P. M.
    [J]. REVIEWS OF GEOPHYSICS, 2012, 50
  • [9] Upgrades to the boundary-layer scheme in the met office numerical weather prediction model
    Brown, A. R.
    Beare, R. J.
    Edwards, J. M.
    Lock, A. P.
    Keogh, S. J.
    Milton, S. F.
    Walters, D. N.
    [J]. BOUNDARY-LAYER METEOROLOGY, 2008, 128 (01) : 117 - 132
  • [10] Wind turning across the marine atmospheric boundary layer
    Brown, AR
    Beljaars, ACM
    Hersbach, H
    Hollingsworth, A
    Miller, M
    Vasiljevic, D
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2005, 131 (607) : 1233 - 1250