Assessment of mood: Guides for clinicians

被引:139
作者
Furukawa, Toshi A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Nagoya City Univ, Dept Psychiat & Cognit Behav Med, Grad Sch Med Sci, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
关键词
Depression; Mania; Mood; Scales; DEPRESSION RATING-SCALE; STRUCTURED INTERVIEW GUIDE; PATIENT HEALTH QUESTIONNAIRE; REPORT QIDS-SR; BECK-DEPRESSION; QUICK INVENTORY; MENTAL-HEALTH; PRIMARY-CARE; PSYCHOMETRIC EVALUATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL DISTRESS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpsychores.2009.05.003
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Objective: This article is one of the series of review articles aiming to present a convenient guideline for practicing clinicians in their selection of scales for clinical and research purposes. This article focuses on assessment scales for mood (depression, mania). Methods: After reviewing the basic principles of clinical psychometrics, we present a selective review of representative scales measuring depressed or manic mood. Results: We reviewed and reported on reliability, validity, interpretability, and feasibility of the following rating scales: Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), K6, Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II), and Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report (QIDS-SR) as self-report scales for depressed mood; Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) and Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) as clinician-administered measure for depression; and Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) as a clinician-administered instrument for mania. Conclusion: Although the rating scales for mood represent a well-trodden terrain, this brief review of the most frequently used scales in the literature revealed there is still some room for improvement and for further research, especially with regard to their clinical interpretability. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:581 / 589
页数:9
相关论文
共 60 条
  • [11] Derogatis L.R., 1992, Administration, Scoring and Procedures Manual II
  • [12] FAGAN TJ, 1975, NEW ENGL J MED, V293, P257
  • [13] Favre S, 2003, ENCEPHALE, V29, P499
  • [14] First M.B., 2001, Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders
  • [15] Fischer J., 2007, Measures for clinical practice and research, V4th
  • [16] The performance of the K6 and K10 screening scales for psychological distress in the Australian National Survey of Mental Health and Well-Being
    Furukawa, TA
    Kessler, RC
    Slade, T
    Andrews, G
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 2003, 33 (02) : 357 - 362
  • [17] The performance of the Japanese version of the K6 and K10 in the World Mental Health Survey Japan
    Furukawa, Toshi A.
    Kawakami, Norito
    Saitoh, Mari
    Ono, Yutaka
    Nakane, Yoshibumi
    Nakamura, Yosikazu
    Tachimori, Hisateru
    Iwata, Noboru
    Uda, Hidenori
    Nakane, Hideyuki
    Watanabe, Makoto
    Naganuma, Yoichi
    Hata, Yukihiro
    Kobayashi, Masayo
    Miyake, Yuko
    Takeshima, Tadashi
    Kikkawa, Takehiko
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF METHODS IN PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 2008, 17 (03) : 152 - 158
  • [18] Evidence-based guidelines for interpretation of the Hamilton rating scale for depression
    Furukawa, Toshi A.
    Akechi, Tatsuo
    Azuma, Hideki
    Okuyama, Toru
    Higuchi, Teruhiko
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2007, 27 (05) : 531 - 534
  • [19] Furukawa TS, 2008, USERS GUIDES MED LIT, P419
  • [20] Screening for depression in medical settings with the patient health questionnaire (PHQ): A diagnostic meta-analysis
    Gilbody, Simon
    Richards, David
    Brealey, Stephen
    Hewitt, Catherine
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2007, 22 (11) : 1596 - 1602