The scaling relationships of leaf biomass vs. leaf surface area of 12 bamboo species

被引:31
作者
Huang, Weiwei [1 ,2 ]
Su, Xiaofei [1 ]
Ratkowsky, David A. [3 ]
Niklas, Karl J. [4 ]
Gielis, Johan [5 ]
Shi, Peijian [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Forestry Univ, Coinnovat Ctr Sustainable Forestry Southern China, Bamboo Res Inst, Nanjing 210037, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Geosci & Nat Resource Management, Rolighedsvej 23, DK-1958 Frederiksberg, Denmark
[3] Univ Tasmania, Tasmanian Inst Agr, Private Bag 98, Hobart, Tas 7001, Australia
[4] Cornell Univ, Sch Integrat Plant Sci, Plant Biol Sect, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
[5] Univ Antwerp, Dept Biosci Engn, B-2020 Antwerp, Belgium
[6] Univ Goettingen, Trop Silviculture & Forest Ecol, D-37077 Gottingen, Germany
关键词
Allometry; dry weight; Foliar water content; Fresh weight; Power law; Reduced major axis; DIMINISHING RETURNS; LIGHT INTERCEPTION; ALLOMETRY; BOOTSTRAP; INCREASES; GROWTH; MASS;
D O I
10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00793
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
There is convincing evidence for a scaling relationship between leaf dry weight (DW) and leaf surface area (A) for broad-leaved plants, and most estimates of the scaling exponent of DW vs. A are greater than unity. However, the scaling relationship of leaf fresh weight (FW) vs. A has been largely neglected. In the present study, we examined whether there is a statistically strong scaling relationship between FW and A and compared the goodness of fit to that of DW vs. A. Between 250 and 520 leaves from each of 12 bamboo species within 2 genera (Phyllostachys and Pleioblastus) were investigated. The reduced major axis regression protocols were used to determine scaling relationships. The fit for the linearized scaling relationship of FW vs. A was compared with that of DW vs. A using the coefficient of determination (i.e., r(2)). A stronger scaling relationship between FW and A than that between DW and A was observed for each of the 12 bamboo species investigated. Among the 12 species examined, five had significantly smaller scaling exponents of FW vs. A compared to those of DW vs. A; only one species had a scaling exponent of FW vs. A greater than that of DW vs. A. No significant difference between the two scaling exponents was observed for the remaining 6 species. Researchers conducting future studies might be well advised to consider the influence of leaf fresh weight when exploring the scaling relationships of foliar biomass allocation patterns. (c) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], ANN FOREST SCI
[2]  
[Anonymous], PLANT PHYSL
[3]  
DiCiccio TJ, 1996, STAT SCI, V11, P189
[4]  
Efron BTR, 1993, INTRO BOOTSTRAP BOCA
[5]   Photosynthetic acclimation of plants to growth irradiance: the relative importance of specific leaf area and nitrogen partitioning in maximizing carbon gain [J].
Evans, JR ;
Poorter, H .
PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT, 2001, 24 (08) :755-767
[6]   CROP PRODUCTIVITY AND PHOTOASSIMILATE PARTITIONING [J].
GIFFORD, RM ;
THORNE, JH ;
HITZ, WD ;
GIAQUINTA, RT .
SCIENCE, 1984, 225 (4664) :801-808
[7]  
Hsu J.C., 1996, MULTIPLE COMP THEORY, DOI DOI 10.1201/B15074
[8]   Leaf Fresh Weight Versus Dry Weight: Which is Better for Describing the Scaling Relationship between Leaf Biomass and Leaf Area for Broad-Leaved Plants? [J].
Huang, Weiwei ;
Ratkowsky, David A. ;
Hui, Cang ;
Wang, Ping ;
Su, Jialu ;
Shi, Peijian .
FORESTS, 2019, 10 (03)
[9]   Variations in leaf mass per area according to N nutrition, plant age, and leaf position reflect ontogenetic plasticity in winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) [J].
Jullien, Alexandra ;
Allirand, Jean-Michel ;
Mathieu, Amelie ;
Andrieu, Bruno ;
Ney, Bertrand .
FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2009, 114 (02) :188-197
[10]   Historical gains in soybean (Glycine max Merr.) seed yield are driven by linear increases in light interception, energy conversion, and partitioning efficiencies [J].
Koester, Robert P. ;
Skoneczka, Jeffrey A. ;
Cary, Troy R. ;
Diers, Brian W. ;
Ainsworth, Elizabeth A. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 2014, 65 (12) :3311-3321