Novel predator-prey interactions: is resistance futile?

被引:0
|
作者
Smith, Jennifer E.
Whelan, Christopher J. [1 ]
Taylor, Steven J.
Denight, Michael L.
Stake, Mike M.
机构
[1] Illinois Nat Hist Survey, Wilmington, IL 60481 USA
[2] Michigan State Univ, Dept Zool, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[3] Illinois Nat Hist Survey, Champaign, IL 61820 USA
[4] USA Res & Dev Ctr, Champaign, IL 61822 USA
[5] Hawks Aloft Inc, Albuquerque, NM 87183 USA
关键词
behavioural strategies; invasive species; life histories; predator-prey; Solenopsis invicta; Vireo atricapilla;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Premise: Prey species may possess inappropriate behavioural, morphological, and/or physiological responses to introduced, novel predators. Thus, introduced predators may exert strong selection on prey species. Organisms: Black-capped vireo, Vireo atricapilla, and the fire ant, Solenopsis invicta. Data: Behavioural response of and time-energy budget for parental vireo defence against nest predation by fire ants. Field site: Fort Hood, Texas, an 88,500-hectare US military installation. Results: Fire ants usually attacked vireo nests near midnight as parents slept. All attacked nests - whether with eggs or nestlings - failed. However, adults defended their nests vigorously. Nest defence was prolonged, with a mean duration of 7.7 +/- 1.5 hours (25 times longer than that against native snake predators). Compared with brooding or incubation, nest defence is energetically expensive, depleting an estimated 59% of fat stores. Conclusions: Fire ants are effective nest predators on this low-nesting bird species. The behavioural response of vireos to this novel predator is wholly inappropriate, with no benefits and considerable costs. Besides the energetic costs, defence results in numerous bites and venomous stings. Vireos ought to abandon their nests when first attacked by fire ants.
引用
收藏
页码:433 / 446
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] PREDATOR-PREY INTERACTIONS BETWEEN MALTHUSIAN POPULATIONS
    FREDRICKSON, AG
    JOST, JL
    TSUCHIYA, HM
    HSU, P
    JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, 1973, 38 (03) : 487 - 526
  • [32] Climate change effects on predator-prey interactions
    Laws, Angela N.
    CURRENT OPINION IN INSECT SCIENCE, 2017, 23 : 28 - 34
  • [33] Predicting Indirect Effects of Predator-Prey Interactions
    Gilman, Sarah E.
    INTEGRATIVE AND COMPARATIVE BIOLOGY, 2017, 57 (01) : 148 - 158
  • [34] Predator-prey interactions: Experimental and field approaches
    Kowalewski, Michal
    Leighton, Lindsey R.
    JOURNAL OF SHELLFISH RESEARCH, 2007, 26 (01): : 217 - 220
  • [35] Modulation of predator-prey interactions by the Allee effect
    Verdy, Ariane
    ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2010, 221 (08) : 1098 - 1107
  • [36] Effects of estuarine acidification on predator-prey interactions
    Amaral, Valter
    Cabral, Henrique N.
    Bishop, Melanie J.
    MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES, 2012, 445 : 117 - 127
  • [37] PREDATOR-PREY INTERACTIONS BETWEEN PROTOZOA AND BACTERIA
    BAZIN, MJ
    ANNALS OF APPLIED BIOLOGY, 1978, 89 (01) : 159 - 162
  • [38] Modelling the prudent predation in predator-prey interactions
    Li, Jiang
    Liu, Xianning
    Wei, Yangjiang
    MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTERS IN SIMULATION, 2025, 229 : 129 - 150
  • [39] Environmental variation as a driver of predator-prey interactions
    Tablado, Zulima
    Fauchald, Per
    Mabille, Geraldine
    Stien, Audun
    Tveraa, Torkild
    ECOSPHERE, 2014, 5 (12): : 1 - 13
  • [40] STOCHASTICITY AND COOPERATIVE HUNTING IN PREDATOR-PREY INTERACTIONS
    Hu, Xiaochuan
    Jang, Sophia R-J
    JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL SYSTEMS, 2021, 29 (02) : 525 - 541