Natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) surgery with rectal eversion and total extra-abdominal resection

被引:34
作者
Efetov, S. K. [1 ]
Tulina, I. A. [1 ]
Kim, V. D. [1 ]
Kitsenko, Y. [1 ]
Picciariello, A. [1 ,2 ]
Tsarkov, P. V. [1 ]
机构
[1] Sechenov Univ, IM Sechenov First Moscow State Med Univ, Clin Colorectal & Minimally Invas Surg, 2-4 Bolshaya Pirogovskaya St, Moscow 119991, Russia
[2] Univ Aldo Moro Bari, Dept Emergency & Organ Transplantat, Bari, Italy
关键词
Natural orifice surgery; Rectal neoplasms; Robotic surgical procedures; Laparoscopic surgical procedures; ANTERIOR RESECTION; TERM;
D O I
10.1007/s10151-019-02058-y
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE)surgery is gaining popularity among colorectal surgeons. The technical aspects of this new procedure are still debated and many variations have been presented in the last decade. Methods We propose a new variation of transanal NOSE after robotic and laparoscopic LAR consisting of rectal eversion by using a special rod after laparoscopic TME. Eversion makes it possible to perform resection and placement of the anvil extracorporeally. We included a video demonstration of the technique. Clinical Patient Grading Assessment Scale was calculated 1 month after stoma closure and the Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS )score was calculated preoperatively and 1 month after stoma closure. Results Seven female patients with rectal cancer, all with normal BMI, underwent laparoscopic (n = 5) or robotic (n = 2) TME with rectal eversion. No intraoperative and postoperative complications were reported. One month after stoma closure, the median Clinical Patient Grading Assessment Scale was 5 (range 3-7), which means "a good deal better". The median LARS score was 14 (IQR 14-19,5) preoperatively and 19 (IQR 19-21,5) 1 month after stoma closure. Conclusions This variation of NOSE surgery was safe and effective in our patient population.
引用
收藏
页码:899 / 902
页数:4
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]   Low Anterior Resection Syndrome Score Development and Validation of a Symptom-Based Scoring System for Bowel Dysfunction After Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer [J].
Emmertsen, Katrine J. ;
Laurberg, Soren .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2012, 255 (05) :922-928
[2]   International consensus on natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) for colorectal cancer [J].
Guan, Xu ;
Liu, Zheng ;
Longo, Antonio ;
Cai, Jian-Chun ;
Tzu-Liang, William ;
Chen, Lu-Chuan ;
Chen, Ho-Kyung ;
da Costa Pereira, Joaquim Manuel ;
Efetov, Sergey ;
Escalante, Ricardo ;
He, Qing-Si ;
Hu, Jun-Hong ;
Kayaalp, Cuneyt ;
Kim, Seon-Hahn ;
Khan, Jim S. ;
Kuo, Li-Jen ;
Nishimura, Atsushi ;
Nogueira, Fernanda ;
Okuda, Junji ;
Saklani, Avanish ;
Shafik, Ali A. ;
Shen, Ming-Yin ;
Son, Jung-Tack ;
Song, Jun-Min ;
Sun, Dong-Hui ;
Uehara, Keisuke ;
Wang, Gui-Yu ;
Wei, Ye ;
Xiong, Zhi-Guo ;
Yao, Hong-Liang ;
Yu, Gang ;
Yu, Shao-Jun ;
Zhou, Hai-Tao ;
Lee, Suk-Hwan ;
Tsarkov, Petr, V ;
Fu, Chuan-Gang ;
Wang, Xi-Shan .
GASTROENTEROLOGY REPORT, 2019, 7 (01) :24-31
[3]   Transanal natural orifice specimen extraction for laparoscopic anterior resection in rectal cancer [J].
Han, Fang-Hai ;
Hua, Li-Xin ;
Zhao, Zhi ;
Wu, Jian-Hai ;
Zhan, Wen-Hua .
WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2013, 19 (43) :7751-7757
[4]  
HEALD RJ, 1986, LANCET, V1, P1479
[5]   Gastric Electric Stimulation for Refractory Gastroparesis: A Prospective Analysis of 151 Patients at a Single Center [J].
Heckert, Jason ;
Sankineni, Abhinav ;
Hughes, William B. ;
Harbison, Sean ;
Parkman, Henry .
DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2016, 61 (01) :168-175
[6]   Laparoscopic colorectal resection does not reduce incisional hernia rates when compared with open colorectal resection [J].
Ihedioha, Ugo ;
Mackay, Graham ;
Leung, Edward ;
Molloy, Richard G. ;
O'Dwyer, Patrick J. .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2008, 22 (03) :689-692
[7]   Success rate of natural orifice specimen extraction after laparoscopic colorectal resections [J].
Karagul, S. ;
Kayaalp, C. ;
Sumer, F. ;
Ertugrul, I. ;
Kirmizi, S. ;
Tardu, A. ;
Yagci, M. A. .
TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2017, 21 (04) :295-300
[8]   Comparison of short-term and oncologic outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic resection for mid- and distal rectal cancer [J].
Law, Wai Lun ;
Foo, Dominic C. C. .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2017, 31 (07) :2798-2807
[9]   There is no difference in outcome between laparoscopic and open surgery for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis on short- and long-term oncologic outcomes [J].
Pedziwiatr, M. ;
Malczak, P. ;
Mizera, M. ;
Witowski, J. ;
Torbicz, G. ;
Major, P. ;
Pisarska, M. ;
Wysocki, M. ;
Budzynski, A. .
TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2017, 21 (08) :595-604
[10]   Wound complications of laparoscopic vs open colectomy [J].
Winslow, ER ;
Fleshman, JW ;
Birnbaum, EH ;
Brunt, LM .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2002, 16 (10) :1420-1425