Tolerability and blood pressure-lowering efficacy of the combination of amlodipine plus valsartan compared with lisinopril plus hydrochlorothiazide in adult patients with stage 2 hypertension

被引:93
作者
Poldermans, Don
Glazer, Robert
Karagiannis, Stefanos
Wernsing, Margaret
Kaczor, Jeanne
Chiang, YannTong
Yen, Joseph
Gamboa, Raul
Fomina, Irina
机构
[1] Erasmus MC, NL-3015 GD Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Novartis Pharmaceut, E Hanover, NJ USA
[3] Clin San Felipe, Lima, Peru
[4] City Clin Hosp 61, Moscow, Russia
关键词
amlodipine; calcium channel blockers; angiotensin II-receptor blockers; clinical trial; combination therapy; hypertension; valsartan;
D O I
10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.02.003
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background: Most patients with hypertension in the United States and Europe fall to achieve the recommended target blood pressure (BP) of < 140/90 mm Hg. Combination therapy is required in approximately two thirds of all patients whose BP is > 20/10 mm Hg above the goal. Combination therapy with agents having complementary mechanisms of action, such as a calcium channel blocker and an angiotensin II-receptor blocker, would be a potentially useful therapeutic option. Objectives: This study evaluated the overall safety profile of combination therapy with amlodipine plus valsartan compared with a combination of lisinopril plus hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) in patients with stage 2 hypertension (mean sitting diastolic BP [MSDBP] >= 110 and < 120 mm Hg) over the short term (6 weeks). A secondary objective was to evaluate the efficacy of the 2 regimens in achieving BP reduction. Methods: This was an international, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, parallel-group study. Patients were randomized to receive once-daily treatment with amlodipine 5 to 10 mg + valsartan 160 mg or lisinopril 10 to 20 mg + HCTZ 12.5 mg for 6 weeks. Safety assessments included monitoring of all adverse events, vital signs, and hematology and biochemistry variables. Efficacy variables included the changes from baseline in MSDBP and mean sitting systolic BP (MSSBP), the response rate (MSDBP < 90 mm Hg, or a >= 10-mm Hg reduction from baseline), and the rate of DBP control (< 90 mm Hg). The overall rate of BP control (proportion of patients with MSSBP/MSDBP < 140/90 min Hg) was evaluated in a post hoc analysis. Efficacy variables were summarized at each visit and at the end of the study (week 6, applying last-observation-carried-forward methodology) using descriptive statistics for the intent-to-treat population (all randomized patients with a baseline BP measurement and at least 1 postbaseline BP measurement). Subgroup analyses of BP changes were performed in prespecified age groups (< 65 and >= 65 years) and post hoc in patients with a baseline systolic BP < 180 and >= 180 mm Hg. Results: Of 130 patients who were randomized to treatment, 128 completed the study: 63 in the amlodipine + valsartan group and 65 in the lisinopril + HCTZ group. The majority of patients in both groups were white (amlodipine + valsartan: 59.4%; lisinopril + HCTZ: 60.6%) and female (57.8% and 54.5%, respectively). The mean age was similar in the 2 groups (56.5 and 57.6 years), as was the mean weight (85.1 and 82.0 kg). Both regimens were generally well tolerated. Adverse events were mild to moderate in severity, and most were not considered related to study drug. At the 6-week end point, both the amlodipine + valsartan and lisinopril + HCTZ groups had achieved significant reductions from baseline in MSSBP (-35.8 [11.8] and -31.8 [14.7] min Hg, respectively; both, P < 0.001) and MSDBP (-28.6 [7.7] and -27.6 [8.6] mm Hg; both, P < 0.001). Response rates were similar for the 2 treat-ment groups (100% and 95.5%), as were rates of DBP control (79.7% and 77.3%). Conclusions: The combinations of amlodipine 5 to 10 mg + valsartan 160 mg and lisinopril 10 to 20 mg + HCTZ 12.5 mg were well tolerated and efficacious, and both treatments were associated with achievement of BP goals in the majority of these adult patients with stage 2 hypertension.
引用
收藏
页码:279 / 289
页数:11
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   2003 World Health Organization (WHO)/International Society of Hypertension (ISH) statement on management of hypertension [J].
Afridi, I ;
Canny, J ;
Yao, CH ;
Christensen, B ;
Cooper, RS ;
Kadiri, S ;
Hill, S ;
Kaplan, N ;
Kuschnir, E ;
Lexchin, J ;
Mendis, S ;
Poulter, N ;
Psaty, BM ;
Rahn, KH ;
Sheps, SG ;
Whitworth, J ;
Yach, D ;
Bengoa, R ;
Ramsay, L ;
Kaplan, N ;
Mendis, S ;
Poulter, N ;
Whitworth, J .
JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2003, 21 (11) :1983-1992
[2]  
*AM HEART ASS, 2006, HEART DIS STROK STAT
[3]   EFFECTS OF TREATMENT ON MORBIDITY IN HYPERTENSION - RESULTS IN PATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURES AVERAGING 115 THROUGH 129 MM HG [J].
不详 .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1967, 202 (11) :1028-&
[4]   A diuretic is more effective than a beta-blocker in hypertensive patients not controlled on amlodipine and lisinopril [J].
Antonios, TFT ;
Cappuccio, FP ;
Markandu, ND ;
Sagnella, GA ;
MacGregor, GA .
HYPERTENSION, 1996, 27 (06) :1325-1328
[5]  
Arauz-Pacheco Carlos, 2004, Diabetes Care, V27 Suppl 1, pS65
[6]   Preserving renal function in adults with hypertension and diabetes: A consensus approach [J].
Bakris, GL ;
Williams, M ;
Dworkin, L ;
Elliott, WJ ;
Epstein, M ;
Toto, R ;
Tuttle, K ;
Douglas, J ;
Hsueh, W ;
Sowers, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2000, 36 (03) :646-661
[7]  
Basile Jan, 2004, J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich), V6, P621, DOI 10.1111/j.1524-6175.2004.03683.x
[8]   Angiotensin II receptor antagonists [J].
Burnier, M ;
Brunner, HR .
LANCET, 2000, 355 (9204) :637-645
[9]  
Cheung Bernard M Y, 2006, J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich), V8, P93, DOI 10.1111/j.1524-6175.2006.04895.x
[10]   Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure [J].
Chobanian, AV ;
Bakris, GL ;
Black, HR ;
Cushman, WC ;
Green, LA ;
Izzo, JL ;
Jones, DW ;
Materson, BJ ;
Oparil, S ;
Wright, JT ;
Roccella, EJ .
HYPERTENSION, 2003, 42 (06) :1206-1252